One thing I cannot understand is why the doctrinal laws for fornication and adultery are the same, with no way to change them. It just does not make any sense. Yes I know this is the medieval period but if you're given the chance to change, or adopt, a religion that doesn't even care about either than why can't you separate them?
Fornication is sex out of wedlock.
Adultery is sex in violation of wedlock. They are similar but different.
One is breaking a contract that is used to determined legitimacy, and inheritance. Far more serious then a tumble between the sheets. I can understand making both of them doctrinal variables. But I cannot understand why they must be connected. But I repeat myself.
It is frustrating, and completely immersion breaking. If I make adultery criminal, then when someone merely fornicates, I get some damn pop-up that forces me to imprison them or lose a piety level. If I don't make it criminal, then I become a tyrant when my spouse cheats and I lock them up for some recreational torture and death by imprisonment.
These two acts should be able to be separated under canon law. I mean there is even options between male/female. Yet nothing regarding the seriousness of the act?
Fornication is sex out of wedlock.
Adultery is sex in violation of wedlock. They are similar but different.
One is breaking a contract that is used to determined legitimacy, and inheritance. Far more serious then a tumble between the sheets. I can understand making both of them doctrinal variables. But I cannot understand why they must be connected. But I repeat myself.
It is frustrating, and completely immersion breaking. If I make adultery criminal, then when someone merely fornicates, I get some damn pop-up that forces me to imprison them or lose a piety level. If I don't make it criminal, then I become a tyrant when my spouse cheats and I lock them up for some recreational torture and death by imprisonment.
These two acts should be able to be separated under canon law. I mean there is even options between male/female. Yet nothing regarding the seriousness of the act?
- 32
- 13
- 1