• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Chapter IV
The End of Divine Right
The swamps that Carr found around the Mississippi proved to be a death-trap. Almost 600 of his men were killed by disease and the treacherous terrain during Carr’s trek to the area now known as Baton Rouge. When he finally decided to cut his losses in the area and head north, the expedition had named the area in the most reprehensible way they could think of; Louisiana, after Louis the Thirteenth of France. The King of France was extremely unhappy with the name, and many French documents to this day refer to Louisiana as “The Mississippi Swamps”.

On his way up the river, Carr engaged in much the same practices that Onslow had after the Attawadora Incident. British trade was thus cemented as the first step of the process that led the Empire to expand after the initial land-rush of the New England Era. Edward the Sixth’s reign would turn out to be the only one in British history, during which the empire’s expansion was based on a desire to gain more land. Future parliaments would be sucked into expansion by a desire to protect British trade.

For now however, Carr’s expedition headed upriver, the winter slowly closing in on them. In the winter of 1520-21, the expedition suffered the consequences of abandoning their heavier gear in Florida. The soldiers had thrown away items that seemed pointless at the time, which meant large amounts of winter clothing and extra blankets. The result was an expedition reduced to some 2,500 men. Carr himself contracted what his personal doctor diagnosed as the common cold. One year later, mere miles from the hill on which Onslow was buried, Alfred Carr died of pneumonia.

jones.jpg

1. The statue of Carr’s successor, Simon Plumer, in Detroit, Michigan.​

After the winter and Carr’s death, the expedition finally came out of its long post-Florida hell. Plumer was charismatic and liked enough to get the men’s spirits up, and make them sympathetic to the idea of continuing the expedition into the great hole that now dominated their cartographers’ maps of America between the Mississippi and the coast. It is often speculated that Plumer spread a rumor among the men of a great city of gold somewhere in the Americas, which he believed to be in that hole that proved to be dominated by the Appalachians. Regardless of Plumer’s actual methods, it was around the time of the expedition’s return that the tale of El Dorado began to take root.

Plumer and his men spent a year trying to find a way through the Appalachians to the coast, but ultimately had to go back down to Florida, and head back up the way they came in order to get back to the Commonwealths. Upon their return, they had increased the number of tribes trading with the British three times over, and inadvertently sparked a fascination toward the new continent in the mind of a young Spanish prince when their stories reached Europe.

In the old world, a slowing down of the initial spread of Protestantism was taking place. The Holy Roman Empire was still nominally catholic due to Bohemia’s refusal to become a part of the League of Hesse. The League was an internal imperial organization set up by the protestant constituencies to protect their rights. When Vladislav the First refused to convert at the League’s request, the League detached itself from the empire, forming a bizarre nation within a nation.

In Britain, religious strife was almost non-existent. In the 1520s, Edward and parliament legislated against religion-based laws to avoid the kind of strife that was now rampant in France and the League-Empire, thus unwittingly creating the first instance of what a young American revolutionary named Thomas Jefferson would hundreds of years later call “the wall of separation between church and state”.

edwardvi.jpg

2. Edward the Sixth, King of England, Great Britain and Ireland, and Sovereign of the American Commonwealths.​

In 1528, Edward officially ended the monarchy’s association with any form of religion, by renouncing the idea of divine right. The monarchy was thus now based on air. Many members of parliament suggested abolishing the monarchy, since it had no legal or divine basis. The majority of parliament however, dismissed the idea, and Edward managed to reaffirm the monarchy’s right to the throne two months later in a most unusual way.

He called the first proper election in history, albeit limited to the nobles in the land and parliament. The matter to be voted on was the monarchy, and whether the King of England had the right to rule the country. Despite often being painted as a benevolent and perhaps overly kind king, it was during the election that Edward showed just how ruthless a political mind he was. He unscrupulously dug up favors and old friendships among the nobility, worked feverishly to ensure that the most adamant anti-monarchists in parliament were otherwise disposed on Election Day, and even turned to bribes in the case of Prime Minister James Lancaster.

When the time eventually came, parliament and the nobility almost unanimously voted in favor of “the given right”. That is, Edward, and all his descendants and their legal heirs, were given the right in perpetuity to the office of Sovereign. The British monarchy is to this day the only monarchy that has, even technically, been elected into office. The genius with which Edward conducted his moves late in his reign has prompted many historians to believe that the King’s entire reign was one long gambit to make the British monarchy a legal institution, independent from religion.

jameslancaster.jpg

3. James, 3rd Duke of Lancaster (1505-1581). First Prime Minister of Great Britain (1525-1574). His time in office was extended considerably by the lack of age and term limits on the position of Prime Minister, which was created as a personal favor of Edward’s for James.​

Edward the Sixth died in his bed at the age of 82, on August 5th 1533. Edward’s long reign had wreaked havoc with succession, as his only living legal heir was his sixty year-old daughter, Mary. Her only legal heir in turn, was her grandson, three-year old George of Middlesex. Mary was crowned in January 1534, but her reign proved to be especially short-lived. In August of 1534, Mary died. Unwittingly, 29-year old Prime Minister James Lancaster had become head-of-state until George reached adulthood.

In the next decade, Lancaster would turn the office of prime minister into something radically different from what Edward had envisioned it as in 1525. When George came to the throne, Lancaster would wield more power legally than the new king, and it would not be until after Lancaster’s resignation due to old age that the system of checks-and-balances would be restored. Of course, by then Britain would be a very different place from the peaceful trading nation that Lancaster became temporary sovereign of in 1534.
 
Last edited:
Queen Mary's reign appears to have lasted for 300 years and seven months. :)
 
Queen Mary's reign appears to have lasted for 300 years and seven months. :)

Oh dear. That's what writing so long in the Vicky II forum does to you. :D Fixed now.
 
A voted king? That's funny. Let's see what comes next to that "peaceful trading nation". Something not quite peaceful, methinks.
 
A voted king? That's funny. Let's see what comes next to that "peaceful trading nation". Something not quite peaceful, methinks.

Not quite peaceful indeed.

Sorry for the sluggish update pace guys.
 
Chapter V
“The Sterling Rules the Waves”

The British Pound’s domination of European markets had been assured during Edward’s reign by the dual sword of Europe’s division and the trust and admiration held by the other trading nations for Edward. When Edward died and James Lancaster took command of the nation, the latter part of the Sterling’s safety net was naturally gone. In response to fears that parliament, and more specifically Lancaster, would try to consolidate and make permanent the Sterling’s position as the currency of trade, Lubeck, Genoa, Venice, Holland and Friesland created the League of the Five.

Lancaster at first paid no attention to the league. British merchants in the first two years of the league’s existence operated as they always had, and trade flowed through London from the colonies, and onward to the continent as fast as ever. In maritime trade, Britain’s position seemed essentially unassailable, so pervasive was the British Merchant Fleet. Due to the vast amounts of money involved in trade with Britain, the Royal Navy would often not have to protect a merchant vessel, as authorities at the destination often did so in order to protect their profits. As Lancaster himself said, “Britain does not need to fear Europe, for an invasion relies on the waves, and the Sterling rules the waves”.

The British might were more than content with the current system of international trade in which they held the highest rank, but were by no means in a position to topple the European economy if they so wished, only severely shake it. This changed when the League of the Five began to challenge Britain’s position. The initiative originated in Lubeck, in a meeting of the League in February 1537, when the three representatives from Lubeck proposed that the League begin to force the British out of the continent and establish itself as the pillar on which the European economy stood.

nikolausv.jpg

1. Nikolas Bromse, the Burgomaster of Lubeck, who proposed the anti-British initiative.​

British merchants soon found themselves harassed in League Cities. High tariffs suddenly appeared on British goods, and only British goods. For a brief period in 1538, it seemed like the League would succeed without as much as a glance from Lancaster and parliament. Then in June 1538, Dutch ships forcefully boarded a British merchant vessel, the Louisiana, and confiscated the trade goods on board for being in violation of League law. When asked when such law had been implemented, the British merchants were told not to question it.

Why the League of the Five went so far is anyone’s guess. Most likely the amount of success they had achieved since the beginning of the initiative caused a fatal development of hubris. When Lancaster heard of the events aboard the Louisiana, he is supposed to have gone into a fit of rage. He immediately opened talks with the League demanding they rescind anti-British policies. When the League outright refused in January 1539, Lancaster decided to take the more direct and violent approach.

He petitioned parliament for the right to have the Royal Navy act “to enforce the will of the British parliament, people and sovereign” in the matter of the League of the Five. Effectively, Lancaster was asking permission to blockade the League until his demands were met. Parliament split in half over the measure, into Lancastrians and Porters. The Lancastrians supported Lancaster, as their name suggests, believing that British trade should be protected at all costs. The Porters on the other hand, believed that it was not worth sending Britain into what was effectively its first war since 1446, and British merchants should stick to friendly ports.

dukeofportsmouth.jpg

2. Henry Fitzroy, 2nd Duke of Portsmouth (1487-1553), Leader of the Porters.​

Lancastrians ended up accounting for 3/5ths of the new order in parliament, and thus the Royal navy left port to blockade the League of Five. The League at first refused to believe that the Royal Navy had actually instituted a blockade, and would not respond to Lancaster’s demands, which at first were only for the revocation of anti-British measures. Eventually, as the blockade became effective, commerce by sea stopped. The resulting drop in income forced the League to act.

At first, they went to the emperor, demanding he support them against Lancaster. He refused on the basis that Lubeck and the League had brought this on themselves. In reality, the refusal was probably based on the knowledge that Bohemia was knee-deep in debt to Britain due to copious borrowing to fund wars in the late 1400s and early 1500s. Thus the League was on its own against the most powerful navy in the world.

The next step was either giving into British demands, which had become increasingly draconian, or trying to defeat the British. Lancaster was now demanding that British merchants not only have their rights restored, but be given preference in trade. Obviously, this was not an option for a League that’s sole purpose had become ending British dominance in trade. In early 1540, in the seventh month of effective blockade, the League began to hire private ships in France, Spain and Aragon, and preparing to slip its own navies out of harbor.

By 1841, by which time trade elsewhere in Europe had begun to suffer, and the sudden poorness and thus lack of League merchants had allowed the British to corner the market, the League was ready to act. They slipped out of harbors and rendezvoused in Norway with their privateers. Only the Dutch fleet, which was under the most surveillance due to its proximity to Britain, did not escape, showcasing how ineffective years of peace had made the Royal Navy.

battleoftheseamount.jpg

3. The Battle of Vesterhavet, in which the League Fleet was sunk.​

The Royal Navy soon learned of the fleet amassed at Kristiansand. British Admiral James Morway decided that the best way to destroy the fleet was to lure it out. He sent his three largest ships to sail near Kristiansand, and then turn back toward Hamburg. He hoped the League Fleet would take the bait and pursue the ships to the edge of the Danish west coast, where they would find the rest of Morway’s 3rd Squadron, which although slightly smaller than the League fleet, was much better equipped.

The League Fleet under Otto Bromse, brother of Nikolas, took the bait easily. The fleets met each other on March 4th 1541. The initial contact was heavily in favor of the British, with half the League Fleet coming out of the exchange damaged and about one tenth sunk. At this point, Bromse tried to flee, but Morway gave chase. The next two days, the fleets exchanged sporadic fire as both maneuvered along the coast in a desperate game of cat and mouse.

Eventually, on March 7th, Bromse ran up a white flag. When informed of the defeat of their navy, the League was finally forced to accept defeat. The terms they accepted now were even harsher than before. Not only were British goods subject to tariff-freedom, some would have to be subsidized by the League. The Trade War of 1538 thus ended with the only real competition in terms of trading nations gone. Lancaster now held the keys to Europe’s economy.
 
Last edited:
From the Wars of Religion to the Wars of Commerce. Interesting twist of events. I wonder what Marx will say about this.