Is this a good idea? Perhaps if users pay a small amount for the hard work been done for creating different types of building. More designer would be willing to put more time into it. So you can get 100+ different types of building for a particular city in America or europe. Simcity is a good way of showing what can happen when its all free. You will get different types of building but as said not to the amount you need to recreate a realistic city. So having it free shows it just wont work. Cause there is no incentive.
And I think its reasonable that if you want your city to look like Toronto and want all the buildings of that city or most of it then be willing to pay a little price for it. Cause alot of work will have gone into creating 100+ buildings. Texture and all.
There can also be free ones too but paid one will always look better.
And there should also be an option to lock the content so it cant be edited and only used for skyline. Simcity has this. Why would you want your hardwork given away and used for other things? They should also be an option that if the designer want it to be free then they dont need to lock it.
Any other ideas to promote more designer to want to create more individual buildings of realistic cities?
And I think its reasonable that if you want your city to look like Toronto and want all the buildings of that city or most of it then be willing to pay a little price for it. Cause alot of work will have gone into creating 100+ buildings. Texture and all.
There can also be free ones too but paid one will always look better.
And there should also be an option to lock the content so it cant be edited and only used for skyline. Simcity has this. Why would you want your hardwork given away and used for other things? They should also be an option that if the designer want it to be free then they dont need to lock it.
Any other ideas to promote more designer to want to create more individual buildings of realistic cities?