• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I wont dispute that, I was merely debunking the myth that christians never did any peacetime raiding

Right, but I was saying they didn't do what the Barbary pirates were known for doing:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_pirates

Wiki said:
In addition to seizing ships, they engaged in Razzias, raids on European coastal towns and villages, mainly in Italy, France, Spain, and Portugal, but also in the British Isles, the Netherlands and as far away as Iceland. The main purpose of their attacks was to capture Christian slaves for the Ottoman slave trade as well as the general Arabic market in North Africa and the Middle East.[2]

While such raids had occurred since soon after the Muslim conquest of the region, the terms "Barbary pirates" and "Barbary corsairs" are normally applied to the raiders active from the 16th century onwards, when the frequency and range of the slavers' attacks increased.

Corsairs captured thousands of ships and repeatedly raided coastal towns. As a result, residents abandoned their former villages of long stretches of coast in Spain and Italy. The raids were such a problem that coastal settlements were seldom undertaken until the 19th century. From the 16th to 19th century, corsairs captured an estimated 800,000 to 1.25 million people as slaves.[2] Some corsairs were European outcasts and converts such as John Ward and Zymen Danseker.[3] Hayreddin Barbarossa and Oruç Reis, the Barbarossa brothers, who took control of Algiers on behalf of the Ottomans in the early 16th century, were also notorious corsairs. The European pirates brought advanced sailing and shipbuilding techniques to the Barbary Coast around 1600, which enabled the corsairs to extend their activities into the Atlantic Ocean.[3] The effects of the Barbary raids peaked in the early to mid-17th century.

There is just no comparison in either scale or extent between what the Barbary Pirates did and what anyone else was doing in this time period.

That is why these Berber states got there own special mechanic, while everyone else's activities are still modeled in privateering and the new mechanic of sailor impressment from blockading coastal provinces.
 
Last edited:
I remember once seeing Lübeck having more rebels than population in Victoria 2, maybe women and children joined as they don't count towards the population?
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Not for every action of Barbary pirates was one of the Barbary states responsible!

Until end of 16th century there was a state of 'eternal war' between the Ottoman lead Muslim states and the Christian states. Only after that persistent diplomatic relationships were established gradually, also with the Barbary states.

Piracy is not a term that belongs to international law. Piracy is a crime executed by individuals not by states. The so called Barbary states authorised private seafarers to raid seafarers that belong to states to whom they were in state of (declared) war. This kind of warfare is called corsairing resp. privateering and was legitimate measure in time of war according to contemporary international law.

Pirates are criminals who use violence only for their own purpose without being authorised by a state. So you have to differ between Barbary pirates and Barbary states. Barbary pirates are pirates (individuals, private seafarers) which have their origin in the Barbary states. It might be true that those pirates were somewhat tolerated and were recruited as corsairs in time of war (Barbary corsairs), but they are not the same entities. Barbary states were not "pirate states".
 
Last edited:
  • 2
Reactions: