Well, than they are good enough to have a vote then....Not a single one of the suggestions in this thread have been good.
- 1
Well, than they are good enough to have a vote then....Not a single one of the suggestions in this thread have been good.
Yes, when looking at the information for the country of France, there will be the three icons to indicate that it is a <Tier X> <land-based> <monacrhy>, each of those will be hoverable and provide an explanation. The name France on that page will not have a tooltip to indicate that it is a 'country name'.But it can tell you that France is a land-based country, linking the rules for that kind of entity.
I an fully on board with having a tooltip that explains the HRE. I don't think that the HRE is an IO needs to be part of it. I don't think that IO then also needs a tooltip ('An IO is one or more countries together that have bespoke mechanics' doesn't need to be stated).And some IOs might appear or sound quite country-like (like the HRE) and giving some additional information about the type of entity just as a hovertip-hook is a viable use. Even though IOs do not share too many properties. And again, if basically every other entity's detail window states its type, then IOs should do, too.
The term is not optimal (hence this thread), but the concept is not completely useless to state.
"Miscellaneous Political Entity" would be another awful name replacement.When the common thing between the group we call IO are that each is discretely made for each individual case then is it really a group? The group is the 'Miscellanea' or 'Miscellany'.
No, not until a cynic throws a dead feastherless chicken into the discussion in order to make a point.This thread really is the modern incarnation of the Athenian Agora and Plato's Academy