I am going with Crusader Kings 3. Reason, the PDXCON on Sunday mentions just Crusader Kings, not 2, whilst making of DLC for Crusader Kings teams mentions 2 on Saturday (today). There is no way a professional organisation didn't know what they were writing, & this was done deliberately.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
Unfortunately CK3. 
It could be good, but CK2 just isn't that dated yet, whereas V2 is from a bygone era of PDS games and in a great need of modernization.
It could be good, but CK2 just isn't that dated yet, whereas V2 is from a bygone era of PDS games and in a great need of modernization.- 1
Unfortunately CK3.
I can understand what you are saying in that V2 & ironically EU4 (although 18 months younger) is more due a new version, as CK2 is in a better condition than them. Though if CK3 is announced I will be delighted as feel this is their best game.
- 1
I believe we will see CK3 yes. Which will be great! But a dark ages game would be welcome too.
I wonder. The time schedule is wrong, and the new game was apparently a new franchise outright. I'd suppose it's CK3 and something else in 30 minutes.
Isn't the other one just the new Surviving (Aftermath) game? That's not officially announced yet either.
...or not. Huh. I stand corrected, but I'm still curious about the new franchise game, which I'll suppose it's now obvious it's not going to be announced yet.
- Status