Playing DV after a long break (I think it was CK 1.04 before) and enjoying it.
I do have a question about the Realm Duress condition. What factors drive this event occurring and also ending? I would appreciate understanding the drivers here.
My previous ruler had this event which lasted a while, then eventually reversed. My current ruler has had it also, but it seems to have lasted longer and been more stressful - I have been playing "whack a traitor" for a while now!
Also, there is a fault in the game logic. Consider situation where a vassal defects:
1) I get a claim against them
2) I declare war and eventually force them back into vassal status
3) They get another event which prompts them to quit vassalage
4) I get a claim, but the game shows I still have a peace treaty with them.
Quiting vassalage when under a peace treaty should mean the (now ex) vassal should be the one breaking the peace treaty. Alternatively, the logic in the event should test for peace treaty and not have the break vassalage event option occur when under peace treaty.
I do have a question about the Realm Duress condition. What factors drive this event occurring and also ending? I would appreciate understanding the drivers here.
My previous ruler had this event which lasted a while, then eventually reversed. My current ruler has had it also, but it seems to have lasted longer and been more stressful - I have been playing "whack a traitor" for a while now!
Also, there is a fault in the game logic. Consider situation where a vassal defects:
1) I get a claim against them
2) I declare war and eventually force them back into vassal status
3) They get another event which prompts them to quit vassalage
4) I get a claim, but the game shows I still have a peace treaty with them.
Quiting vassalage when under a peace treaty should mean the (now ex) vassal should be the one breaking the peace treaty. Alternatively, the logic in the event should test for peace treaty and not have the break vassalage event option occur when under peace treaty.