elvain said:btw:
the names you wrote, BorisK, they are Spanish - German - Latin.. am I right?
but I supose those are names of tribes rather than regions, aren't they?
also I came across some problems in getting PhotoShop so I still do this all in Windows paint what's not very ideal...
Hello,
Well... yes, the names are spanish-german-latin, latin comes from
http://www.columbia.edu/acis/ets/Graesse/orblatn.html#Nordalbingia
Yes, in the beginning were saxon tribal territories (until 8o4). In 804 after defeat the nordalbingians and begin the famous deportations of Widmodia, etc., Charlemagne founds the counties of Dithmarschen, Holstein y Stormarn and give it to the abodrites slavs. Later on slavs are expelled and became eclesiastical divisions depending Archbishopric of Hammaburg, with concrete limits as you can see in the map. This is my work (804-810).
I have red in the ESPASA_CALPE (is the bible-enciclopedy in spanish language), that Oton I defeat the wagrians slavs (abodrites too) and found the bishopric of Wagrien or Wagria incorporating it to Holstein. If you go on in medieval history, the names of Storman, Dithmarschen, Holstein and Wagria apear continuously as parts of Holstein. As counties or historical divisions of Holstein. Other thing are the imperial free towns of Hamburg and Lübeck.
In your map I recognize:
-Dithmarschen county
-Hzm. Holstein
-Territories of free imperial towns of Hamburg and Lübeck.
-Hzm. Lauenburg
My opinion is that if you include Dithmarchen in the map, you have to include too Wagrien, Storman and Holstein.
I hope it will help you...
PD
I think that is better to work with vectorial programs like Free Hand or Adobe Ilustrator because bipmaps programs, with pdf. archives by example, are too heavies and slow for this kind of maps.
Last edited: