Rome II is CKII

[Sernista]

Different time periods. In what way?

As an example: Charlemagne and the Golden Bull of 1356 do not belong in the same game. Or perhaps the Viking Age, the Crusades, and the Hundred Years War do not belong in the same game. The Abbasid Caliphate and the Mongol Empire. There are plenty of different things we can point to as things that just Do Not Belong in the same game in the same way you declare the rise and fall of rome, and the conidtions before/after those states, belong in different titl;es, and yet these are loosely accepted in CK2

 

[Gurluas]

I wish this was the case, then we'd get Hellenic back.

I personally do not mind expanding the game to incorporate more.
Ck2 has already shown with the Horselords and the Republic that it can go past the feudal system.

 

[klopkr]

Ck2 can't go further back than june 9th 632 without risking the same fate of a certain french cartoonist.

 

[Gurluas]

Ck2 can't go further back than june 9th 632 without risking the same fate of a certain french cartoonist.

You can't let religious extremist stop you.
You should never give in to their uncuteness and evil.

 

[klopkr]

You can't let religious extremist stop you.
You should never give in to their uncuteness and evil.

On one hand you're absolutely right. On the other hand I like keeping my hands.

 

[Sernista]

And there's also the whole "deliberately insulting people is a dick move" thing. Obviously, hurting or threatening people over that is also a bad thing! But the fact that people doing bad stuff dislike it doesn't make it not rude as anything.

 

[yourworstnightm]

No, CK2 works less and less the further you stretch the timeline. It alread work really poor to depict 769 (and that scenario was a big mistake).