Hm... Några har hängt alldeles för mycket på en massa skitspels servrar och forum. CS t.ex. 
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
hmm needed to place iceland in that area!
But as we now so where the Irish on Iceland before the Norwegian.
This will also make the Norwegian to stay in the Irish area to crusade!
Slaver = slavar\trälar
Last edited:
Looking like a map n an atlas of Denmark with Bornholm in a squareKrantz said:<IMG>
hmm needed to place iceland in that area!
But as we now so where the Irish on Iceland before the Norwegian.
This will also make the Norwegian to stay in the Irish area to crusade!
Slaver = slavar\trällar
Träller/Træller isn't = Slaver
cool-toxic said:Looking like a map n an atlas of Denmark with Bornholm in a square
Träller/Træller isn't = Slaver
I was just joking about the slavs and the germanic on the Europe Continent!
Hmm yes making the map like on the picture! I think this will be better!
I'm sure we'll get used of that angle very quickly! I can't wait until I can spend 10 hours a day pillaging and looting Öland! Mowhahah!
Krantz said:
East side of baltic sea would be more logical than england... So there would be lot of fun in baltic sea...
Van der Gent said:I'm sure we'll get used of that angle very quickly! I can't wait until I can spend 10 hours a day pillaging and looting Öland! Mowhahah!
***Writing a note to remind Krantz that Öland, according reliable sources, should be completly untakeable***
Gamlasemlan said:
yes true!
England is releated to the Saxon, Angler, Danish, Norwegian vikings and also Swedish tribes in the south.
Ahmed AA said:
yes like the trade with the goths in Poland. But that will only start a discussion about the goths!
Also the Russian to point out why the suomi people call Sweden and Russia for nearly the same name!
But the baltic hmm! i see no great releated viking story about the baltic!
But Estland have been using the Syssle provinces also
, but if they used the herad system i don't know!
Last edited:
Gamlasemlan said:
But baltic is not? There is a theory that vikings not only traded and looted baltic but also controled at some degree kurland and more (some viking runas talk about it too.). Only not long before crushaders arrive kurlanders become free. There were viking settlement near modern day Liepaja also quite a many toponyms (according to this theory) is scandinavian origin as they were delivered from those settlements were these colonist lived...
And I am not talking about russia where they established russian states...
(Ofcourse - I am living in Riga so I am just interested to conquer from that side.
)
Krantz said:yes true!
But the baltic hmm! i see no great releated viking story about the baltic!
:
There is some. But you know - they all seems the same:
"I am Erik. Great looter and pilliger. I looted there and there... I went there and there and returned with great bounty." etc anly litlebit detailed...
It remainds those carvings in iran where all those persian kings wrote:
"I am Cyrius 2. Son of the great Cyrius. I am great conquer and I rule everyone. I rule those, those, and those... I am most handsome and most religios man. I am best sharpshooter and fighter. etc." :rofl:
They don't. In Finnish, Ruotsi = Sweden and Venäjä = RussiaKrantz said:
I would strongly prefer either a decrease of relative size of the nations (to allow more of an upright angle), or if you just cut the entire Benelux and France off the map. Don't really see why they're there in the first place. The only viking who really got into stuff down there was a giant Earl's son from Møre, whos descendant conquered England in 1066. Brief history lesson there..
deallus said:They don't. In Finnish, Ruotsi = Sweden and Venäjä = Russia
I would strongly prefer either a decrease of relative size of the nations (to allow more of an upright angle), or if you just cut the entire Benelux and France off the map. Don't really see why they're there in the first place. The only viking who really got into stuff down there was a giant Earl's son from Møre, whos descendant conquered England in 1066. Brief history lesson there..
Hmm to please you all I need a text on how big the viking kingdoms was in all of northern europe!
I could drop the herad system and paint all the kingdoms like one province, will be easier for me to construct the map if we do like this and the map can be upright.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: Finnheden
Culture: Finnhedian
Area: wæstbo, østbo, sunnerbo and mo hundreds.
Name: Værend
Culture: Virdaner
Area: Uppvidinge, Vidinge, Konga hundreds.
Name: Allbo
Culture: Allboar
Area: kinnevald and allbo hundreds.
Name: Blekinge
Culture: ?
Area: lister, bregne, medelsted and østre hundreds.
Name: Gønge
Culture: ?
Area: villand, ø gønge, v gønge and gers hundreds.
Name: ?
Culture: Langobarder
Area: Albo, jerrested and ingelsted hundreds.
Name: Burghændæholm
Culture: Burgunder
Area: haslæ, hænning, michlingæ and rothnæ hundreds.
Last edited:
If you take Saxon and Angler then take also Jyder.Krantz said:yes true!
England is releated to the Saxon, Angler, Danish, Norwegian vikings and also Swedish tribes in the south.
cool-toxic said:
Hmm jyder are the people on Jylland?
If so how big was there kingdoms?
Denmark have never used landskap, but the danish used syssel before the reform around 16 century.
And i have all of them on a picture, but had denmark syssel in Skåneland also?
Last edited: