Fair enough.
I would allow it, if Rome was in dire straits, but...well...it is not right now.
Fair enough.
Are you saying Pontifex, that myself and Senator Merula mismanaged the funds of the Republic during our times as Consuls? Are you saying that the construction of the roads put the Republic in a bad situation? Hopefully with these improvements to the infurastructure of the provinces we will not have to pay the costs from our own purses.
If we sign a pact with Carthage Egypt is likely to be enraged further, but it will free our hands to conquer barbarian tribes without further harassment by other nations. The only other two nations capable of conquering barbarian lands will have signed treaties with us and we can simply divide up these territories amongst us.
But would country B's involvement be considered an "attack on X", implying that X's defensive ally Y would have to go to war against B?
Okay, a few explanations.
First the reward / punishment system.
If it is used during the term, the reward / punishment is a more or less large sum he receives / pays. The worst punishment possible then is Impeachment. If it is used at the end of the term, the reward / punishment is a gain / loss of prestige and maybe Clients. Worst punishment possible then is Exile (then the player gets a new Character). The popularity (e.g. +1) serves as roll modifier.
(Concerning pontifex' reward, can't he reward a current magistrate not for his current job but for his past one in another office?)
Yes he can. He proposes rewards / punishments for the Officers in the current term. But he also may evaluate the work of the Officers of the last term (but this is only possible in the first turn of the new term, therefore now; consider it as account for their work of the whole term).
EDIT:
And please keep in mind, that rewards / punishments may only be proposed for people with a nonzero popularity rating.
So, if I understood well, the Pontifex can propose a reward, like a triumph (prestige) to someone that just step out of an office, and can also propose a financial reward someone currently in office. And he's also in charge for prosecution and punishment?
Wait, weren't we talking about the Censor? And, of course, every one of his orders is a proposal to the Senate, right?
You can't give a triumph out willy-nilly, you knowIt was one of the highest honours a citizen could recieve, and giving it out for no military victory is against the spirit and the word of the laws about it. Of course, as randakar pointed out, historical accuracy is up the GM
![]()
Coinneach said:I cleared my inbox, by the way. Apologies I've not been rping as much as I should.