Should slave estates increase slave ratio?

[svalan_i_dalen]

Should slave estates increase slave ratio in the settlement it is built?

I think you build it because you want slaves there?

Or am i missing something?

 

[Roy1012]

That would be nice.

 

[-Stukov-MK VII]

there is no need to do that as you can set slaves to never promote

 

[Nostalgium]

there is no need to do that as you can set slaves to never promote

Which is a PITA to do in literally every place you want slaves when your empire is big enough. This is why I only go cities and farm estates, lmao.

 

[Surimi]

I would actually say no. Slaves can potentially generate a lot of unrest, so while having a really high slave proportion might seem like a good idea, it's going to tank province loyalty and generally be quite annoying to manage. Freemen are okay pops, and in most civilized governments they're fairly easy to keep happy which means a balance of slaves and freemen will generally be fairly managable.

 

[IsaacCAT]

Should slave estates increase slave ratio in the settlement it is built?

I think you build it because you want slaves there?

Or am i missing something?

The desired ratio is a up-bottom decision to modifiy POPs composition in your territory. But even then, devs have had the thought to describe that slaves would not want to move to slave states as they want to promote and break free.

I am against desired ratio to decide POPs in a territory but not having increased slave ratio in slaves states is fine.