So whats next for EU IV?

[RichardOlcese]

EU 6.

 

[ArtFart]

EU 6.

Surely it makes sense if they want a next gen level EU game they double the number...

EU8 confirmed.

 

[themrspartan]

Since we got playable Aborigines, which proves that for EU4 Gameplay>Historical accuracy, maybe we could get more playable Siberian tags, like Yakuts or Chukchi

No please, two wrongs don't make a right...

 

[mathuser]

People talk about Middle East, but which countries do you mean exactly? Maghreb region was nicely reworked in Golden Century, Mamluks in Craddle of Civilization, Persians and Timurids quite recently too.

Only Lebanon, Palestine and Arabia are lacking a bit in the Middle East. Maybe it could actually nicely fit for "Crusader" themed DLC.

The geography of the Western Maghreb was done incorrectly with Golden Century. There are multiple provinces in the wrong places (like Salé and Gharb), which could have been fixed with some simple changes. This is something that should be addressed.

Otherwise, some non-conquest missions would be nice.

 

[Romanix90]

Origin disaster must not be repeated.

I hited like for some part of the comment however this one hit me and perhaps some other players. Now i can't speak for everyone but for myself. I had fun with Origins and i think it was ok DLC. I think everyone can agree that Leviathan was a disaster however Origins not so much.

 

[Romanix90]

Explain? I thought Origins release was relatively smooth, and the DLC is really good imo. It added some really damn fun nations (personal fav is Kilwa)

His comment confused me as well because i thought that Origins was quite good. (My personal favs are Congo and Ethiopia)

 

[ArtFart]

His comment confused me as well because i thought that Origins was quite good. (My personal favs are Congo and Ethiopia)

Yeah Origins is definetly one of the better Immersion packs imo, it's mission trees are very well detailed and really fun to play as.

 

[Sete]

I like the new colour on the Portuguese units... that blue is quite similar to the blue of Victoria 3...

 

[iClipse]

Middle east. Ottomans and Mamluks are the major nation who have bad missions and flavours. Also persia is the player's favourite tag. The reason why lion of north was appreciated was because of the many players playing scandinavia and baltic countries. Leviathan and Origin disaster must not be repeated.

I'm hoping you meant emperor instead of Origins? Origins was great.

Emperor was the one where you could revoke in 1460.

 

[namewhichisnottakenyet]

Usually I would have said Scandinavia in a thread like this.

Now that a Scandinavia DLC is out I don't know what to do with my life anymore.

 

[Koopatin]

Surely it makes sense if they want a next gen level EU game they double the number...

EU8 confirmed.

Nah, just Europa Universalis! No Numbers, no subtitle.

Because it is never ever annoying when movies do that.

 

[Korsjan Rīkis]

I'm wondering, if 1.35 will be a free patch or an immersion pack.

 

[Josar]

I am in favor of a revamp of the near East, Ottomans, Mamuluks, and Byzantium all could use revamps to their mission tree similar to lions of the north, and it would be worth giving the Anatolian small beyliks some missions trees even if they were shared.

 

[fire_dragon]

My Hope is, EU V.

almost 4k hours into this game and im still learning things but i think its ready for a massive overhaul.

 

[Zoot1337]

Can we do Caucasus or Balkans?

 

[Hermerico]

I like the new colour on the Portuguese units... that blue is quite similar to the blue of Victoria 3...

What did he mean by this?

 

[Sete]

What did he mean by this?

Recently the Port units had a bit of work done on them because they were locked with green and red colour.
Now they have a blue colour that looks similar to the map colour of Portugal in Vic 3. So I'm insinuating that ina future patch Portugal map colour could change like it did in Vic3.