The ability to specify the name of a petty king and petty kingdom, rather than simply adding the PETTY localised prefix before the title.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
.png){kind=avatar}
what about those options in eunuch trait f.e. ?
Code:
eunuch = {
sex_appeal_opinion = -20
fertility = -50.0
customizer = no
cannot_marry = yes
cannot_inherit = yes
}
Not bastard, you can already make a trait with "cannot_inherit=yes"
Fair enough, but I stand by the option to say prevent marriage in your dynasty's favor.
Added as "Separate localisation for petty kings/kingdom; not all cultures would call it the same as the kingdom tier"
Added as "A trait flag preventing marriages that preserve your dynasty; E.G., forcing you into matrilineal marriages if you're a man"
Thinking further it'd be a terrible idea in most cases, as for any dynastic type of succession it'd lead to bypassing the ruler's own children even in favor of some random guy in the dynasty with the trait.
Still, added as "A trait flag giving the character preference in succession over anyone without it"
Added "Add an on_title_creation on_action with the title as the FROM or FROMFROM scope"
Added as "Allow changing cultures' culture modifier by event, and multiple modifiers being active at once. Static modifiers could still be used to define the modifiers, or event modifiers"
What would they do?
There's already a "prison = yes" to imprison and "add_mistress" or something for the second.
Do you mean commands to make concubines and imprison?
You can imprison with "imprison = ROOT" and such.
There's already an add_consort command.
I mean in character history files not in-game console commands.
What do I do with "prison = yes" if I want character X to be imprison by character Y during certain date?
"imprison = ROOT" how could that work in character history file?
I did't know add_consort existed.
Use the "effect" scope in the history files to do anything you could do via events.
What do you mean? Do you mean that any character scopes listed in here http://ckiiwiki.com/Scopes will work?
I would like to request the following:
This would have many uses, one of them being that the Game Of Thrones mod could then use its marvelous House CoA's in place of generic and contrived "territorial" CoAs. Another would be that you can have a more historical vanilla game since most of the "country" CoAs we know actually started out as personal or family CoAs. Exceptions where the CoA should remain unchanged when the ruling house changes would be configured just like the Seljuk sultanate exception is done right now.
- That the usage of dynasty CoA in place of the realm CoA can be toggled for all cultures and religions, and all levels of titles, without simultaneously toggling dynasty-name-themed realm names. I.e., a new command be allowed in 00_cultures.txt which is analogous to the way "dynasty_title_names = yes" works but only affects the CoAs, and works for all religions. Its name could be "dynasty_coa_for_realm = yes" and it would be for counts, dukes, kings and emperors.
This would have many uses, one of them being that the Game Of Thrones mod could then use its marvelous House CoA's in place of generic and contrived "territorial" CoAs. Another would be that you can have a more historical vanilla game since most of the "country" CoAs we know actually started out as personal or family CoAs. Exceptions where the CoA should remain unchanged when the ruling house changes would be configured just like the Seljuk sultanate exception is done right now.
I support improved moddability so I support this, but I want to remind you that Paradox games these days are one of the most mod friendly games in existance.
Most games these days have completely scrapped any kind of moddability. A good example are Valve's games. Mods like Counter-Strike and Team fortress propelled Valve into success, but these days the most modding their games give is the ability to make maps or replace existing models, and compared to others like EA or Sega that's a lot too.
The Total War series is another good example. they went from extreme moddability (Rome Total war, Medieval Total War 2), to no moddability at all (Empire Total war and later)
Most games these days have completely scrapped any kind of moddability. A good example are Valve's games. Mods like Counter-Strike and Team fortress propelled Valve into success, but these days the most modding their games give is the ability to make maps or replace existing models, and compared to others like EA or Sega that's a lot too.
The Total War series is another good example. they went from extreme moddability (Rome Total war, Medieval Total War 2), to no moddability at all (Empire Total war and later)
Last edited:
Hate to sound unthankful, but now that we have Enatic succession laws, I'd really appreciate it if Women could take on multiple husbands and/or concubines.
Currently trying to make a more fantasy mod, and I'd really appreciate it seeing what I have planned for some of the races.
Currently trying to make a more fantasy mod, and I'd really appreciate it seeing what I have planned for some of the races.