• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Look I am cryinover this because theres alot o shit happening at home,and Ive been busy but all of this happening all at once is just too much do you people wanna play a fun game and have fun or not!?

So I wish to know who here still wishes to commit to playing regardless of what ruling I give this sunday and each sunday after until 1819?
 
Last edited:
Okay, Saber has informed me that Ego was given instructions to be as harsh as possible and given the trust to act whatever it took to safeguard sweden, something I was not informed of, since my major problem was that I had felt that Ego was going beyond and above the call of duty inregards to his redows of England, I had also asked him not to redow England but this is porbably unfair of me but then again I did not wish for the games fun factor to drop like a rock, how hard could it be to wait 5 years for the truce to expire? But there is no rule against breaking a truce, the game has its own deterence agaisnt it.


So now we are left with Ego dowing an AFK Max, who we had agreed since he signed on would be no problem, Max I believe has no control in the matter of when he eats.

Can someone give me an accurate estmate of the damaged caused to England when Max was AFK and Ego attacking/keeping Max at war and a fair compensation will be given to England.

I will nto force the provs back to England that is between Max and Saber.
 
To claim I live off the goodwill of other players is a bit of a stretch. I find that moderately insulting. You think Austria and the Ottomans just handed over Italy? Well Austria did sell a couple provinces, but for the most part, it wasn't so cheap and easy as you like to make it out to be. Just ask Abs about the long bitter war I fought with him, or the multiple long wars I fought against the various Ottoman perms and subs, starting with Rokka and eventually ending against Tonio. In fact I've fought a war every single session since I've joined, and I'm willing to bet Spain spent at least as much time at war as she did at peace for the last 100 or so years I've played. This was not optimal. If I was smarter, I would have hyperteched more instead of minting like an idiot. I'll agree that England and Sweden could have been more aggressive and Spain would have suffered more if they had, but so what? I'd have taken the loss just fine.

Furthermore, I'd like to think that the peace that Spain has enjoyed with both France and Austria has been mutually beneficial to some degree.

England did in fact attack me at one point when fighting Austria and I gave him 9 colonies in North America rather than fight with my outdated galley fleet of doom. Had he been more experienced, he would have taken more valuable provinces, but Max is still learning. So what if he "ruined" Spain. Cut him some damn slack. I'm sure there's not a single one of us in this campaign who has not collapsed a country through stubbornness. And none of us ever made any mistakes right?

And frankly, what the hell do people expect when you pit a total newbie against cheech, who's one of the best fighters in the game, and to boot has Turenne. If the rest of you decided on putting Max there over Ego, well, shame on you since you knew the result ahead of time, but Max can't be held responsible. I personally think he's added a lot to the campaign, and even though he's made errors here and there, I've enjoyed playing with him.

And so what if I kept friendly relations with France and "kissed cheech's ass"? The alternative was to partition him with Austria and BB which had an ungodly alliance when I took over, so I have no compunction about supporting cheech in that situation. I gave him the Netherlands for parts of Italy and I'd do it again in a heartbeat when faced with such a German alliance, which was trouncing him even with Turenne. If Spain is vulnerable now, who cares? At least the situation is more interesting than no France, which Spain and everyone else has to keep in their calculations. And cheech has had plenty of opportunity to weaken Spain if he wanted to, but hasn't done so.

As I said, I'm leaving the campaign, but I should be clear it's not through the actions of any player or Sid's GMing Sid, you're a great guy but your GMing needs work. It's tough to decide what would be fair to England now, but I also wouldn't edit provinces back as that's not exactly fair to Sweden. What you should keep in mind though in the future is that you're the GM, and you need to be firm and set boundaries. If players are overstepping them, you NEED to enforce things, and not just let them slide. If you have to boot a player or three, do it to preserve the integrity of the campaign. It's not an easy job, but it's more than just doing edits.

My leaving isn't the fault of any players, and has nothing to do with the GMing, but rather the fact that I have an obsessive personality, and I devote far too much time in a given session to diplomatic talks and "strategery". I basically count my last Sunday almost gone through first the session and then chatting with Tonio about random things. I can't afford it anymore, work is starting to pile up this semester, I've come to the sad conclusion that this behavior is self-destructive, and I won't let a game get in the way of my doing well. Hence my decision to leave. So, so long and thanks for all the fish.

With all of that said, I've offered Spain to you Ego, if you want it.
 
Sorry to see you go Zeit. It was fun playing with you :). Too bad we never got to confront really 1v1, I hope we play sometime in the future, maybe in EU3.

Also, I am pretty dedicated too, and my studies have suffered because of it. Unfortunately I'm that kind of guy, I like my fun so I sacrifice a few things (good grades included :D).
 
Sid Meier said:
Okay, Saber has informed me that Ego was given instructions to be as harsh as possible and given the trust to act whatever it took to safeguard sweden, something I was not informed of, since my major problem was that I had felt that Ego was going beyond and above the call of duty inregards to his redows of England, I had also asked him not to redow England but this is porbably unfair of me but then again I did not wish for the games fun factor to drop like a rock, how hard could it be to wait 5 years for the truce to expire? But there is no rule against breaking a truce, the game has its own deterence agaisnt it.


So now we are left with Ego dowing an AFK Max, who we had agreed since he signed on would be no problem, Max I believe has no control in the matter of when he eats.

Can someone give me an accurate estmate of the damaged caused to England when Max was AFK and Ego attacking/keeping Max at war and a fair compensation will be given to England.

I will nto force the provs back to England that is between Max and Saber.
What I didn't like was that EGO had taken ALL of Australia while max was gone this is a huge advantage before MAX even stands a chance to act so I guess we can nullify that war...

BUT

Max broke his agreement with Sweden with taking USA:s provs. So I guess we have to come to an agreement here.

maybe Sweden has to give back 50% of the gains from the war as a penalty from grabbing provs from a AFK player....
 
Zeit good bye I had a nice time playing with you...

I don't have the same probs with school since I get good grades without much effort :p

bye
 
im sad to see ziet go are you sure you cant play a few more sessions?

Sid you should be careful calling people names on the forum it gets youi in trouble. I know i do in game but thats different :)

GMing is hard and a thankless role. I never do it anymore because im not up to it. I dont think youe done such a bad job. Its been a very fun game and you have to take some credit for this.

Lets all calm down and get back into th spirit of whats made this an intersting and dynamic camopaign.
 
thank you cheech, zeit you better have a replacement lined up.
 
Zeit, i am sorry but i will not play as your spain - i guess everyone knows how spain was pretty nice after i subbed it for the first time, and then what hapened to it after people prefered a player that had no experience instead of me, to PERM it.

As you reached the conclusion, i thought to myself everyone wanted to have an easy ride with Spain - everyone was their enemy - China, France, Austria, Sweden. Indeed, after the session Maximator permed it for one day, it got raped by everyone possible - To china he lost california, to sweden south africa, and to france was totaly overrun.

I am not blaming Maximator for his skills - everyone was inexperienced once - i too, once did very n00b thingies. :) (and still make em btw)

----------------------------------------------------------------

What I didn't like was that EGO had taken ALL of Australia while max was gone this is a huge advantage before MAX even stands a chance to act so I guess we can nullify that war...

point 1 - i didnt move a finger for the first 2 years, i only started invading him after i got fed up with waiting (and after Tonio warned me to watch out my back for auto-WP) - 40 minutes to have dinner is a joke. I could have eaten a whole cow by then. Its a fault of respect to make players wait so much time for you - while you are "eating", filling your stomach with whatever you ate, i was dying of boredom for nealy 1/4 of the session.
point 2 - i didnt send a stab hit till i got most of england under my control - i wanted to vassalize him but then it turned out that i thought - vassalizing gives saber a nap for 20 years - right when nelson comes out. Why should i let such happen? Better kill england now. When i had most of england under my control, maximator had been in here for a good while. Even if i wanted to send him a stab hit when he was AFK, i couldnt, since australia wasnt that worth of WS.
point 3 - as i said to absolut before, if the WS system was infinite, i would have more then +150 WS - australia was giving me less then +30 WS. Australia wasnt contributing a finger to the war - actually, it was giving england a bit less income and was given me a bit more income. All of Australia is perhaps contributing 500d yearly to england - if you "think" that was decisive, edit +500d to the english treasury while reducing the same amount to sweden - controlling a province doesnt give the full income of it, but whatever - sweden isnt going to hurt from loosing 500d - i would even give more just to stop hearing people pestering me about such a thing.
point 4 - again, i repeat, i dowed england 2 days after they peaced USA - i think we were playing below normal, and 2 days in eu2 with that speed, means about 2-3 seconds. His problem going AFK - i had stated almost 10 times both to the public as well in private that i was going to DOW him - coming with the idea he had to eat was purely a joke. 40 minutes as i stated, would sink all the advantages i had against england - he had 15 WE, and as you can see, he is still hurting from it.
point 5 - as i pointed out in point 3, WS wasnt a problem - i held english unfortified provs in america, his CoT in north america, most of continental England, had about +40 WS from battles. What i demanded from England costed +88 WS - these provinces alone combined with my battle WS gave me more then +99 WS - saying i won the war only by overruning australia is awesomely funny - while australia was giving me less then +30 WS as i stated.
point 6 - Australia... in both the 1st and 3rd war australia had 0 MEN defending it. Or almost 0 men compared to what i sent down there - i sent a 44 general and about 40k men. I doubt he would have defended australia more then he had done before tbh. And even with or without Australia the war would end in a swedish victory.
point 7 - i wasted 11000d in these 3 wars against england - nullifying the results because of the fault of respect from the part of a player is laughable, and if i was playing sweden, if such hapened, i would leave the game for sure. Not saying that saber will re-act the same way as i would, but if you loose another player due to poor gming, dont come saying i didnt warn.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Saber said:
EGO did nothing illegal, and I should not suffer because of it.

Again, its a joke that Maximator goes AFK and i am the one to be blamed - look sid, you told me you checked all rules from MTT and added em here - then check the rule about being AFK, which you mysteriously failed to copy here.

Maximator was the one going AFK, and should be the one being punished - well tbh after checking what hapened last session between maximator-saber, i would have made sure Maximator stopped going AFK or i would kick him out of the game, for good.

And again, as Saber said, i did not do ANYTHING ilegal - stop pointing your fingers at me, or at sweden. Maximator's own fault for going afk, right after my countless warnings and after i dow him 2 days after he peaces USA. I cant believe you still blame me for this - have you no common sense for christ sake?

And tbh, if i wanted to attack him when he was AFK, all of england would be swedish now, and his government would have collapsed.

Sid said:
how hard could it be to wait 5 years for the truce to expire?

Well Tonio, now i ask you to enlighten them since i am tired. Explain to them the advantage of having an enemy with 15 WE, and what would happen to the WE if i had waited 40 minutes till Maximator stopped eating.


----------------------------------------------------------------

About your GMing Sid, i cant say its exactly perfect, and well, i dont really like having to say this to you, but the best friends tell the truth to each others. So here goes my little slap:

1º - i was blatantly insulted both in the game and in these forums by troy - FAL warned him about 3 times. When i ask you to enforce the rules, which state "you have to stay in a good mood", all that you say is "solve it in game". ArmOrAttak then decides to send my stab to hell, by making it -3. Then in the game lobby i re-ask you to enforce the rules, and you, kick me from the game instead! That was a pure joke - Troy went against the rules, insulting me 3 times consecutively and i am the one being kicked from the game? I havent, and will not forget that.
2º - What hapened to saber wasnt exactly a very nice thing, either. I wasnt here but i checked the logs, and since i am not part of this game i dont think it matters if i did. Either way, you acted inapropriately - first, having someone that has to "eat" in the middle of a war is a joke. Secondly, you should NEVER allow a player to join the game knowingly he has to "eat" in the middle of a session, specially when his "dinner" takes about 40 minutes, rougly 1/4 of a full session. What could you have done? Never allowed him to play the game.
3º - Asking me not to DoW England as a GM - a GM has no power over such a thing, UNLESS the country is ghosted. And when i re-dowed the 3rd time, Maximator was here and wasnt even AFK. If a country is being beaten, and even being nearly annexed, a GM has no power over such a thing, and cant stop a player from beating the other.
4º - Yesterday - i really disliked your GMing as well, when i dowed england and maximator was "suposedly afk", you didnt move a finger. I insisted countless times to get a sub or simple to pause the game, but you didnt even bother to listen to me. Making me wait 2 years and a half till Maximator returned, pissing me mostly and as i said, made the war expensive even before it started.

And lastly, saying England should be given "compensation" - that is yet, another joke. Look, if someone here has broken the rules, its england.

First peace deal - they agreed IN PUBLIC that they wouldnt hurt USA anyhow - what did they do? Reduce USA to 1 province minor.

During the second war - I sent about 2-3 forced stab hits to england - he refuses them, against the rules. I didnt pay atention to my fleet and my fleet got engaged by the british one - when i notice that, i retreat - making me loose about 50-70 warships - actually, all warship looses i had from stats were thanks to that.

During the second war as well - when i was doing virtually nothing against england, rebels pumped out, and the war was already eating my coffers without even starting. I had rebels in Pegu/Zanzibar and even in Novgorod pumping out of thin air. While Max had China to kill his rebels, i had to handle the ones in my territory by myself, wasting cash, again, without the war even starting.

During the entire game - Not that i care, but Maximator went against the rules by saying FU and calling me bitch everytime i sent him a stab hit, for this, he should be punished - as you can see, using such abusive words against fellow players, is against the rules

----------------------------------------------------------------

What you can do to "fix" the situation? Well, compensate sweden with cash for the 3 forced stab hits refused from the part of england, and because of Max's AFKness. Move the provs England got from USA back to the latter. Punish Maximator for using so many abusive words so many times.

Force Max to stop "eating" during the game, or going "AFK" as well. If he is unable, then get someone else to take his place.

Either way sid, you as a GM, must follow rules to the letter, and, refusing forced stab hits, or saying abusive words as maximator said, are against the rules. On the other side, i am inocent, and never broke any. I hope, this will clarify you, and everyone else.
 
Zeit, as i said it was interesting tacting with you, which i could only enjoy. Easy victories are not enjoyable, though there are sort of people, who aims only to them. So thanks for those hard 60 years, which you gave to me :D

Sid, i can say only positive about you too as the guy, but i would say that couple of GM decisions before last session made me felt that not best reasonable way was chosen. I appreciate if you think about corrections, but do a favor not to give up please

In GMing it is easiest think to rule by iron fist, but the best by brain. Anyway noone can reach the best from the beginning.

Regarding the map, Sultan supposes that best way is to
- return Sweden europe provinces by Spain
- return English europe provinces by Sweden
 
I strongly oppose a punishment for Max being afk. However, he did break the rules on other points and should be punished accordingly. If you chose to attack him again its your call, but he had to go afk so there wasnt much to do about it, I dont care how big advantage you had, you still made a descision. I dont care what you think about it, he joined the game under those conditions, be it good for the game or not.

Im perfectly happy with who joined the game and who didnt, I think Max is a very nice person and Im glad Ive gotten to play with him.
 
OK,
I was under the impression, that i wasnt allowed to annex or vassal the USA, I didnt, so I did not see what the problem was. If saber asks if Im interested isnt the same as asking for something, I think I can be as literally to see crippling USA isnt the same as annexing or vassalizing. It wouldnt have mattered because you would have attacked me again. Might have taken a little longer.

Everyone knows I gotta eat, and that I cant do jack about when or what(I had to make dinner too) It was no problem and I told you I had to go, therefore I was quite glad you proposed me the WP, but I would have given you your demands otherwise.
I dont really see what you are trieing to achieve here; you won and Ill be dead in 1, maybe 2 sessions.

I am inexperienced but not stupid, if I would have complied to your demands of Australia, you would have attacked again and taken Indonesia and a part of NA and then you would have attacked again and taken more of NA and so on. The only thing i did was postpone it a lil.
 
ok so who will show up on Sunday?
 
BurningEGO said:
Explain to them the advantage of having an enemy with 15 WE, and what would happen to the WE if i had waited 40 minutes till Maximator stopped eating.

Disregarding any other arguments, I'm just chiming in to tell that (ab)using massive WE to utterly destroy enemies is something we used to do back in 1.05 days and should stay there. Had I been still in Prussia, I definitely would've intervened.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.