Supremacist movement should be affected by size of primary culture compare to others in Incorporated states

[NGASAK]

I feel like the "Supremacist Movement" should get a support boost when the primary culture is a minority in its core territories.
A ruling nationality that's outnumbered is way more likely to support supremacist ideas to justify its power. Example are Austrians and Hungarians in the 19th century, where both were influenced by stronger Supremacist Movement due to local ruling class fearing to loss their power to Slavs, that was especially prominent in Hungarian part with it's Magyarization.
Basically, the smaller their percentage in INCORPORATED states, the bigger the supremacist attraction should be.

 

[maruta074]

I understand what you're saying. In reality, that's probably true.
However, if you set it up like that in a game, it would be impossible to suppress social unrest in areas with comparable populations, and some countries would no longer have the gameplay goal of competing with other countries.
I feel that this is a necessary compromise.

 

[NGASAK]

However, if you set it up like that in a game, it would be impossible to suppress social unrest in areas with comparable populations, and some countries would no longer have the gameplay goal of competing with other countries.
I feel that this is a necessary compromise.

It doesn't block or prevent you from doing anything. In fact, it would show why Austria-Hungary, Ottomans, or even more modern South Africa were so difficult to manage when you have two powers inside your borders literally tearing them apart. One of the common complaints about Vic3 has always been how stable Austria is, and that making life difficult for them is what's needed.

 

[maruta074]

Still, Austria up until 1918 was a real functioning state.
And since it's a game, the player's nation should have the means to do things it couldn't do in real life.

 

[NGASAK]

And since it's a game, the player's nation should have the means to do things it couldn't do in real life.

... you still can do. "It doesn't block or prevent you from doing anything", but makes it more simulative and chalenging. Countries should feel different, especially through their social aspect.

 

[maruta074]

I agree with adding more challenges to playing as Austria in terms of domestic governance, but there needs to be some balancing to ensure the Austro-Prussian War doesn't start too soon, giving us more time to deal with new problems.

 

[Don Wing]

The more famous supremacist fascist governments in history were Germany, Italy and Japan all of wich had an overwhelming local native population with relative to null foreing aliens. So having an homogeneus population of the ruling culture is best for supemacy. While trying to have supremacist in India (as british) kinda won't work and is pretty futile in the log run.