• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Daniel A said:
Ok, but we are prolly talking only about 15 minutes or at most 20.
Goodgood :). I might leave ten minutes earlier than regular endtime though. But the way i see it, Skåne is not extremely vital so that the session has to end when i am forced to leave.
 
John,

Your MT calculation is erronous, again. The dividend is described as "1105.7". This is an impossible value.

This is not the first time you make this error and I have informed you before about it. If you just read the instructions, which are very easy to understand, you will find it is easy to make a correct calculation.
 
Daniel A said:
IMPORTANT MESSAGE

We have a little more than 43 years left to play. That would normally be quite suitable for two sessions. However no one knows what may happen.

I say that we make a serious effort to reach at least Jan 1 1799 the next session so that we can be a little relaxed the last session, only needing 20 years to be played in that last session.

But without playing under stress, wars on BN or slow speed.

This means that the participants should mentally be prepared to play a little longer than 23 CEST the next session.

I hope no one objects to this.

Im not sure I can do that, I need to get up early for school and are thus prevented from playing late, I will do my best though.
 
i don't know if i can play longer either. i have to get up at 6 am and it's alrdyalittle bit to late for to play until 11. but if we have to i can do it. but Abs have to play cuz i'm going to attacking him for a change. hehe:D
 
-Lyko- said:
i don't know if i can play longer either. i have to get up at 6 am and it's alrdyalittle bit to late for to play until 11. but if we have to i can do it. but Abs have to play cuz i'm going to attacking him for a change. hehe:D

We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the streets and in the fields, we shall fight on the hills, we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old.

:D
 
hahaha.. trying to take churchill's words for ur own? that wont help u my friend.
 
Daniel A said:
John,

Your MT calculation is erronous, again. The dividend is described as "1105.7". This is an impossible value.

This is not the first time you make this error and I have informed you before about it. If you just read the instructions, which are very easy to understand, you will find it is easy to make a correct calculation.

If you looked closer you should've easily realized that this was a typo. The calculation and formula for attaining it are correct, even if I don't show all my work.
 
King John said:
If you looked closer you should've easily realized that this was a typo. The calculation and formula for attaining it are correct, even if I don't show all my work.

How on earth can I understand it is a typo? :confused: And why should I need to look. Do as the rest of us and present a full calculation.
 
Daniel A said:
How on earth can I understand it is a typo? :confused: And why should I need to look. Do as the rest of us and present a full calculation.

Because the typo'd calculation was much different than the result. If you were really curious you could've run through my numbers to see if they really added up to 4.13. I can see that you assumed I'd made a mistake because I did in the time before, you jumped the gun on this one though ;).
 
Well, the dividend number is wrong, simple as that. How much wrong I have not checked, but I cannot go around checking all your arithmetic all the time. Now and then I make a detailed check. And sometimes I only check if it looks reasonable. In this case it did not, it was an impossible number.

But now I have checked in detail and your number is not merely a trifle wrong but substantially wrong. LOL. Now be a good boy and read the instructions and do your homework John. :D

And please present a complete calculation, like the rest of us. :)
 
And so we have lost our GM, again. I will do a list of the edits on Wednesday and then make them. I will need some help with leaders though, can you do that KJ?
 
sure abs
 
Daniel A said:
Well, the dividend number is wrong, simple as that. How much wrong I have not checked, but I cannot go around checking all your arithmetic all the time. Now and then I make a detailed check. And sometimes I only check if it looks reasonable. In this case it did not, it was an impossible number.

But now I have checked in detail and your number is not merely a trifle wrong but substantially wrong. LOL. Now be a good boy and read the instructions and do your homework John. :D

And please present a complete calculation, like the rest of us. :)

The entire equation is correct, except for the typo that we've already discussed. The dividend is supposed to include a "*20", but it was left out. Not out of the calculations, merely left out of my written work on accident. Since you checked it in detail, I am very surprised that you still did not notice this.

No response to this post is necessary. I assume you have realized the misunderstanding and the error of your assumptions, and no more need be said :).


EDIT: Turns out that I was wrong, in this calculation, and actually every other one I've made so far :p . Thanks Daniel :)
 
Last edited:
I will not be able to attend Thursday's session as I am travelling from Wednesday afternoon to Friday afternoon.

I'll try to find a sub before then.
 
I'm going to hungary next session 5th october. i'll try to get a sub for that session