• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Apologies for not replying earlier but I wanted to get all the background material done and that we're ready to move into the narrative.

Donatists, eh? Those guys were harsh historically.

From what I've read, their ideas seem very similar to the latter day Calvinists. While initially strong in North Africa at 476 AD, they would eventually recede into the background as the ambitions of the Emperors of Hadrametum called for a more practical faith to advance their aims.

It's an interesting choice to start "in media res." I'm excited to see how Islam and the Bulgars come into things!

Thanks, I struggled for a bit on how to start the AAR as long plodding backgrounds is not everyone's cup of tea and I wanted an impactful way to communicate how different this world is from OTL.

I was unsure if CK2 or 3 until I saw Africa. Africa is good for orienting 2 before or after Holy Fury and 3 from 2. Thank you for the background.

I'm a latecomer to Paradox games so I've never experienced CK2 and I don't think I could play it after the QoL improvements most people say that CK3 implemented.

I appreciate the overview!

How far did this Caliphate stretch? Did it conquer Parsa?

What will be the greatest extent of this Second (Third?) Achaemenid Empire that is composed of Bulgars?

We will come to all these key points of history in due time. Stay tuned!

Parsa looks divided. How long will it take for them to fall into civil war?

How similar is Opone to OTL's Ethiopia (besides the early conversion and the location)?

Parsa will face trouble similar to the Achaemenid Empire with factions and houses having grown strong over the centuries. We shall see if its civil war or internal collapse that they face.

Opone would face pressure from the Kushite Kingdom. They and other Christian states in the region will be engaged in holy wars for a very long time.

Funny seeing the Papacy located just north of the Pyrenees Mountains. Any idea who those two independent spots in Spain and part of the Balearic Islands belong to?

These independent fiefdoms are home to Gallo-Iberian tribes who have managed to hold off Roman predations on their territories for a long time. Eventually, they'll inspire the popular comic series about a lone Iberian village holding out against Roman domination we are familiar with in the modern day. In the meantime, they will act as springboards for the Gallician revival that develops in Northern Spain over the next two centuries that contests Roman domination in the region.
 
Last edited:
  • 4
Reactions:
These independent fiefdoms are home to Gallo-Iberian tribes who have managed to hold off Roman predations on their territories for a long time. Eventually, they'll inspire the popular comic series about a lone Iberian village holding out against Roman domination we are familiar with in the modern day. In the meantime, they will act as springboards for the Gallician revival that develops in Northern Spain over the next two centuries that contests Roman domination in the region.

So I can assume Asterix and Obelix won't be making an appearance any time soon? ;)
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
The End of the Argeads (476 AD – 496 AD)
The End of the Argeads (476 AD – 492 AD)

With the death of Darius II in 476 AD, the throne passed to his son, Tigraios II. The new Shahanshah was a complex character. Having grown up within the palace in Achaemeniyya, he had a poor understanding of the larger outside world while his father was often away on campaigns in Syria and Egypt to quelch the rebel factions, not on hand to teach him the practicalities of rulership. Growing up with five older sisters who often spoiled the young Shahzada (prince), he grew up lazy and prone to indolence. His courtiers would readily agree to his dreams of restoring the empire to its fullest extent but there was little meat to the skeleton of his plans. As time grew on and he passed his 20s and 30s without tasting a morsel of power, he drew into himself and rarely shared his thoughts or feelings with others. Instead, he would spend his time training his skill with the blade and became known as an able duellist in the Neo-Persian Raqs-e-Shahbaz style – a style focused on swiftness, precision, and deadly strikes, like the falcon it’s named after.

An Aside on the Raqs-e-Shahbaz or Dance of the Falcon
An Aside on the Raqs-e-Shahbaz or Dance of the Falcon
The Raqs-e-Shahbaz is a unique swordsmanship style that emphasizes agility, speed, and precise attacks. It departs from the more common, powerful swings used by Achaemenid soldiers in favour of a more controlled and elegant approach. It was developed in the court of Achaemeniyya among the young nobles looking to pass the time in the long peace of the early 2nd century. Over time, it became more and more formalised and distinct from the standard military training style. Shahruddin Bahram, the Argbadh and chief bodyguard during the reign of Anzaza, was the first acknowledged master of the style and as master of arms within the court, began to mentor the youths of the Great Houses into this Falcon style.

The Raqs-e-Shahbaz is known for its distinctive features and will act as the inspiration for the duelling schools of Europe in the 11th and 12th century:
  • Footwork: Shahbaz fighters prioritize fluid footwork, emphasizing constant movement and quick changes in direction. This allows them to evade attacks and manoeuvre around their opponents, creating openings for strikes.
  • Blades: The Shahbaz duellist favors lighter, shorter blades, often with a slight forward curve. This allows for quicker strikes and easier manoeuvring in close quarters.
  • Emphasis on Thrusts: Unlike the slashing attacks favored by some Persian warriors, the Raqs-e-Shahbaz focuses on precise thrusts aimed at vital points. This approach prioritizes lethality and efficiency over brute force.
  • Disarms and Counters: Shahbaz fighters are trained to exploit openings in their opponent's defence and disarm them with swift manoeuvres. Additionally, they have a repertoire of counters designed to deflect incoming attacks and transition seamlessly into offense.
  • Mental Discipline: The Raqs-e-Shahbaz isn't just about physical skill. Shahbaz fighters cultivate a state of mental focus, allowing them to anticipate their opponent's moves and react with lightning speed.

Tigraios II.png
Finally at 40, Tigraios took the throne. By this time, he felt his best years had been wasted and his many dreams were beyond his reach. Many thought that he was overwhelmed by the legacy of his father. Reinforced by his indolence, he found it easy to come up with excuses to do nothing.


Shadow of fame for Tigraios.png
Instead, he gave in to aggrandising his rule. Paying for craftsmen to adorn his court or sponsoring adventurers to search for fabled artifacts. The most revered of these was the fabled Mandylion, the Image of Edessa that is said to bear the visage of Christ. It was given pride of place within his court and he would often have it brought out for processions to mark feast days in the City.

Recovering the Mandylion.png
Nine years would pass and Tigraios would fail to stem the increasingly vociferous demands of his vassals and nobles. The most dangerous belonged to Madates Bagratid, the ruler of Greece, who contested the region of Bythinia called Optimatoi due an ancestral claim from his maternal side. Madates was an ambitious and aggressive man and this was simply the first part of his ploy to weaken then claim the throne. By pushing his claim, he sought to gauge the extent of his support among the other Great Houses and he found that there were many eager hands ready to take up the sword.


Madates begins his claims.png

Within Achaemeniyya, Tigraios continued with his ways, blissfully unaware of the danger brewing. On the feast day of St Andrew in 485 AD, he was leading the customary procession through the city from the palace to the Baha’I Andro or Church of St Andrew when a disturbance rocked the crowd. Among the many devotees seeking to touch the Mandylion, an assailant broke through and rushed past the Shahanshah’s bodyguard and stabbed him in the throat.

Death of Tigraios II.png

The throne passed to the only child of Tigraios II, Astaphernes, a boy of 9. His rule would be managed by his regent mother, Atossa, who was more interested in indulging her passions over the stewardship of the realm. The empire was still on shaky grounds after the civil war and much of the infrastructure and military strength had been worn down. Tigraios had done little to address the issues and Atossa was content to leave well enough alone. This added fuel to the fire for Madates Bagratid’s claims that the Argeads were unfit to sit on the throne.

Inspired by the sweeping provisions of previous Ecumenical Councils and seeking more ammunition against the Argeads, the scheming kings brought up the question of the Ecumenical Patriarch's power and right to judge sinner from saint. Previous Councils had excommunicated members of the Church they dubbed as heretics and each had been signed off by the sitting Achameniyyan Patriarch, not the Shahanshah. Wouldn’t it stand to reason that God had the right to judge all men, even great kings? This was the first instance of Excommunication as a weapon not just against clergy but against the nobility. The Patriarch Nariman was aware that he was being manipulated by the Great Houses but saw this opportunity to extend his control on the good and great, and agreed that the Shahanshah was a sinner and in conflict with the values of Orthodox Christians.

Excommunicated by the Patriarch.png

By this point, Astaphernes had reached adulthood and was ready to claim full powers but he found himself in charge of a sinking ship. Mobs within Achaemeniyya were calling for his abdication while the vassal kings began calling their armies together to push Madates’s matrilineal claim to the throne.
Astaphernes is an adult.png

The Bagratid War for the Throne
In 492 AD, House Bolbitine in Egypt would present the faction’s demand to for Artanis, Madate’s mother to take the throne. Caught flatfooted, the Argeads found few supporters and as regional levies went over to the challengers, Astaphernes struggled to raise the legions that had supported his grandfather in the last civil war. Fighting would rage for two years, mostly in Thrace and Bithynia as the Argeads attempted a defensive war, trying to hold on to key fortresses to act as rallying points but they were losing ground. With the loss of their last holding in Anatolia, the Argeads prepared for a long siege at Achaemeniyya, in hope of a miracle.

Artanis claim for the throne.png

Twenty thousand men lay before the Darian Walls of the great city with too few within to hold them off. Then an army flying the flag of the Argeads appeared in the West. Pro-Consul Sarduri, Astaphernes’ guardian and mentor had rallied all the forces he could muster to attempt to break the siege. Madates Bagratid and Oxyarthes Bolbitine turned their armies around to face this new challenge. Sarduri only had 7,000 men against a force more than twice his number but his heroic last charge would be remembered for centuries more. Sarduri’s forces were decimated after the charge as the larger host digested the brave warriors and spat out their bones.

Now with no hope of rescue possible, Astaphernes confronted reality and surrendered to save the city of the Achaemenids from any vicious sacking. The last Argead King was imprisoned and stripped of his titles as the Bagratids claimed the throne they had been craving for past few decades. The Argead dynasty had seen four kings and lasted for less than a century.

The end of Astaphernes.png
 
Last edited:
  • 3Love
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Well, then. New dynasty on the throne, and presumably another new one when the empress dies?
 
  • 2
Reactions:
an assailant broke through and rushed past the Shahanshah’s bodyguard and stabbed him in the throat.
Tigaios' life was short and miserable. He had already gone fully grey at 48, not a good sign.
Sarduri only had 7,000 men against a force more than twice his number but his heroic last charge would be remembered for centuries more. Sarduri’s forces were decimated after the charge as the larger host digested the brave warriors and spat out their bones.
I loved the subversion of expectations here: usually, we expect heroic last charges and sudden rescues to work. But this is not one of those stories.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
We did not even get a chance to find out if Artaphernes would have been a decent ruler. Thank you for the update.

Well, then. New dynasty on the throne, and presumably another new one when the empress dies?

Tigaios' life was short and miserable. He had already gone fully grey at 48, not a good sign.

I loved the subversion of expectations here: usually, we expect heroic last charges and sudden rescues to work. But this is not one of those stories.

I tried my best to hold on to the throne as the Argeads but the untimely death of Tigraios threw a massive spanner into the plans before I could consolidate control. With a child ruling over an empire, factions were popping out of the woodwork. The transition from I:R to CK3 is harsh when you have a large empire. The attack was a last-ditch attempt to defeat the besieging army before I ran out of gold (debt has a severe impact on army performance in CK3) but it was not to be.

As a postscript, Astaphernes was executed two years later after a failed rebellion in Thrace. The Argead House would survive for another 50 years thanks to a matrilineal marriage to weak Dux in Italy. They would eventually be wiped out in the Italian Succession wars as the Rexes of Lombardy and Magna Graecia fought for dominance over the peninsula after the collapse of the Roman Empire.
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
So this megacampaign was a failure then?
No, we'll be shifting the vantage point soon to follow another dynasty. Its not called the Book of the Achaemenids for nothing
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
The Bagratid Line & the Start of the Warring Princes Period (492 AD – 504 AD)
The Bagratid Line & the Start of the Warring Princes Period (492 AD – 504 AD)

Screenshot 2024-07-05 101324.png

Emblem of the House of Atizyesid, Shahanshahs from 492-504 AD

In the immediate aftermath of the dethronement of the Argeads, the Bagratids focused on consolidating their power in the hope of preventing others from following suit. Unfortunately, the genie was out of the bottle and the Great Houses now saw that power resided in where men could carve it out. While courtly intrigue was no stranger during the time of the Achaemenids and Argeads, it reached a fever pitch in the short-lived Bagratid era. Assassinations began to destroy what stability was left and regional divisions began to take hold within the empire.

There is a vivid quote from the Essayist, George E.H. Macey describing the latter era of the empire:
“The Byzantine Empire was pre-eminently the age of treachery. Its vices were the vices of men who ceased to be brave without learning to be virtuous… slaves were willing to be slaves, in both their actions and their thoughts, immersed in sensuality, and in the most frivolous pleasures. The history of the empire is a monstrous story of the intrigues of priests, eunuchs and women of poisonings, of conspiracies, of uniform ingratitude, of perpetual fratricides.”

George Macey was part of a growing group of anti-Persian European writers in the 18th and 19th centuries who were eager to disparage the latter-era Achaemenid Empire and refute its connection to the grand edifice it was at the turn of the millennium. They would call it the Byzantine Empire and it became fashionable to exaggerate the orientalism of the empire in comparison to noble Europeans who claimed the 'superior' legacy of Rome for themselves. However, the quote above is quite apropos for the time of the Bagratids.

Screenshot 2024-07-05 090831.png

Artanis would be Banebshen Banbisn for two years before her passing under mysterious circumstances. Her son, Tigranes was the new Shahanshah as Madates, the oldest heir passed away a year before his mother.

Tigranes would rule for 9 tumultuous years and would declare his new royal line the Atizyesids to distinguish it from the larger Bagratid clan. Oxyathres, the master of Lower Egypt, who had partnered with Madates Bagratid to overthrow the Argeads, now begun his own push for independence. His cause was joined by Upper Egypt, Jerusalem and Syria and their war for independence would last four years. Tigranes faced the same issues that plagued the Argeads, unable to muster enough loyal forces to fight on his side and he would surrender after the lords of his court pressured him to end the destruction the independence faction was wrecking in Anatolia.

The South breaks free.png

With the loss of the Levant and Egypt, Tigranes had hope that he could consolidate a smaller and less divisive empire. The Monophysites were no longer a fifth-column danger and most of his remaining territories were squarely Orthodox. Unfortunately for him, the Ecumenical Patriarchate had grown to like the power he wielded over crowns. When Tigranes had refused the new Patriarch Bahram his request for more land in Thrace to establish monasteries, Bahram had him excommunicated for refusing god’s will and the needs of the church. Now with a relevant casus belli, nobles would launch rebellions after rebellions to expand their power base or weaken the throne’s. Tigranes was just barely managing to keep things together when he died of a heart attack in March 503 AD. His son, Darab would only last three months before he fell off the parapets of the Achaemenid Palace in June 503 AD, dead at 20 years of age. The poisoned chalice of the throne would pass to Tigranes’s younger son and last remaining heir, Sina, a boy of five. Again, the knives came out for the young child and he would last another year before meeting his own unfortunate accident.

Tigranes Bagratid excommunication.png

With no legitimate claimant to the throne, the empire broke down with many of the Shahs and lords content to manage things on their own. Achaemeniyya and its surrounding territories passed into the hands of the chancellor, Jamasp Gulakshan, who proclaimed himself the Shah of Europa. Many of the Great Houses chaffed at this upjumped challenger taking the great prize but with control of the treasury and behind the walls of Achaemeniyya, Jamasp was safe from most threats. The next few decades are known as the Era of the Warring Princes as the Great Houses fought over land and century-long feuds were finally given air to be resolved. It seemed that this was to be the final nail in the coffin for the Achaemenid Empire.

Screenshot 2024-07-05 101736.png

The many different factions vying for supremacy and the legacy of the Achaemenid Empire circa 520 AD

Almost like an act of synchronicity, the old Eastern half of the Achaemenid Empire, Parsa, collapsed under duress in 510 AD, just 6 years after the last Bagratid Shahanshah died. However, beyond these lands in the east and west, their old rivals still survived. Rome though much reduced, still held on to Italy while the Pandyas dominated the Indian sub-continent.
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
  • 2Love
  • 1
Reactions:
The Middle East divided, ripe for the plucking for the Muslim horde about to be unleashed.
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Chaos ensues!

The Romans and Indians are probably very interested to see what happens here.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Talk about a collapse. Who will rise from the dust...
 
  • 2
Reactions:
This is a fantastic AAR. I am still catching up on Imperator portions of it, but figured to ask what mods are you using for CK3? I'd love to do a megacampaign starting with I:R, but the gap between vanilla timelines is so long.
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Mayhem is riding tall and taking names through the dual empire lands. Thank you for the update.

The Middle East divided, ripe for the plucking for the Muslim horde about to be unleashed.

Chaos ensues!

The Romans and Indians are probably very interested to see what happens here.

Talk about a collapse. Who will rise from the dust...

I like that the transition from Imperator to CK3 mirrored the start of the 'Dark Ages'. The Fallen Eagle mod with its imperial competencies feature forces you to expend resources on shoring things up as much as you can. Unfortunately for the Argeads and Bagratids, it just wasn't enough. The Muslim invasion is still a century away but they will find enough opportunities in the mess.

We will soon come to see how the Achaemenids return to having a role in the narrative and their place in the new world order.

This is a fantastic AAR. I am still catching up on Imperator portions of it, but figured to ask what mods are you using for CK3? I'd love to do a megacampaign starting with I:R, but the gap between vanilla timelines is so long.

Thank you very much! The primary mods that helps to bridge the time gap between Imperator Rome and CK3 are the following:

Imperator Rome: Timeline Extender and Crisis of the 3rd Century
These two mods will take you to 476 AD and make the extended time line fun and engaging as you deal with the various crisis mechanics.

Crusader Kings 3: The Fallen Eagle
This mod allows you to play from the 4th century onwards (maybe earlier?) and simulates the fall of the Roman Empire. Great if you need to knock down your massive I:R blob even harder. It also tweaks the tech tree to give you some tech advancement goals from your chosen conversion point to the vanilla 867 start date.
Beyond this mod, I recommend Dark Ages and Historic Invasions. Dark Ages is great if you find base CK3 too easy and Historic Invasions introduces many famous conquests to keep the world on a somewhat natural OTL progression of events. As you're going through 900 years of gameplay (476 AD - 1444 AD), I really do recommend these two mods to spice up your gameplay. There are also others I can suggest and do use but I think them's the basics.

There's also When The World Stopped Making Sense (WTWSMS) as an alternative to The Fallen Eagle but I haven't tried it and its still in beta so your experience might vary.
 
  • 3
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Could Tigraios have saved his empire if he actually did anything?

The Bagratids destroyed the empire with their ambition. How did they move to Greece from the Caucasus anyway?

I look forward to seeing how the Achaemenids got to the Steppe and began dwelling amongst the Bulgars from this point...
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Could Tigraios have saved his empire if he actually did anything?

The Bagratids destroyed the empire with their ambition. How did they move to Greece from the Caucasus anyway?

I look forward to seeing how the Achaemenids got to the Steppe and began dwelling amongst the Bulgars from this point...

It's hard to judge hypotheticals but consensus is that the empire was too divided and decentralised to be pulled back together by Tigraios. The Achaemenid Empire was built on the prestige of the ruling family and their military might. Both were in short supply for Argead line.

The Bagratids had developed their holdings and control in the waning years of the Achaemenids. Beyond the Caucasus, they had established almost hereditary control of the governerships of Macedonia and Greece.

The Exile to the Lands of Winter is still a while away. Our narrative will bring us south to Jerusalem next.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
The Achaemenids Claims Power in Jerusalem (492 AD – 524 AD)
The Achaemenids Claims Power in Jerusalem (492 AD – 524 AD)

We’ve not spoken of the Achaemenids in this new era since the Argeads took power a century ago. After the establishment of the new dynasty, the family had spread out across their old empire. There was the rebel Side faction who escaped to Cyprus after their loss in the time of Darius I in the 3rd century. There were also several members who fled to India and took control of the old Indus-Punjab tributary kingdom, Ouarana Indus. Across their old lands, there were many other rulers who sought to claim kinship with the Achaemenids to establish their legitimacy but historians now consider that most of these lineages were fabricated.

Within the empire that Darius II ruled, there was only one existent Achaemenid line still holding some power. A lesser line that traced its lineage to the Banebshen Banbisn Anzaza, who ruled the empire from 189 AD to 205 AD, the Achaemenids of Jerusalem had fled the fall out of the Argead transition and sought shelter in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre within the city. During the civil war, they had been forced to stay constantly on the move within the region to avoid capture or death by the armies of both sides. Achaemenid blood still had value – either to be drained dry or married into depending on which side of the civil war you were on. Their time fighting for survival had seen them develop deep relationships with the good and great of Palestine who yearned for better days and see the family lose many loved ones. By the end of the civil war, the only survivors were two young brothers, Ordanes and Onthotopates, taken care of by their mother, Sisygambis of House Arid.

In the ensuing chaos of the Bagratid War and the independence movement by the southern kingdoms, Sisygambis promoted her children to the local nobility of Judea to let them act as figureheads and champion their independence from Achaemeniyya. The Achaemenid line offered legitimacy and a symbol for many in the region to rally around in their fight for freedom from imperial tyranny. The older brother, Ordanes was already in his 30s and was a capable administrator with a good head for numbers and organisation. He promised the assembled nobility that he would rule justly and ensure that the Houses Xerxid, Javanshiran, Fadlid and Ispahbodan would always have his ear if they acclaimed him King of Jerusalem and that he would defend them against the Jewish threat in Samaria, just across Galilee that the Argeads had failed to address.

So with the breakaway of Jerusalem, Syria and Egypt from the empire, Ordanes Achaemenid sat on the throne of Jerusalem in the new palace, constructed on the grounds of Golgotha and connected to the Church of the Holy Apostle where his grandfather Gobryas had first sought refuge.

Screenshot 2024-07-05 102518.png

Jerusalem in the sixth century was a busy trading and pilgrimage site, acting as a crossroads for Arabian traders from the desert and a key stop along the Babylonian-Egyptian trade route.

The influx of pilgrims spurred trade, art, and a growing distinct cultural identity - Jeruselemian. Within these lands, Persian, Syriac, Nabateans and Jews had been mixing for centuries and had been setting their differences aside to focus on economic gain and trade. Among pilgrims, it became known that they had to stay on their guard against the hawkers and shopkeepers who would haggle them down to the last silver sliver they owned. With the recovery of the Ark of the Covenant from Ethiopia, Jerusalem became the most famous pilgrimage site in Christendom, attracting kings and priests from across the world who desired to lay eyes on this miracle of God.


Recovering the Ark of the Covenant.png

We have this account of Theodesic the Confessor describing the city in the time of Darius, Ordanes’ son:

“The dust of the long journey coated my skin like a second layer of my worn tunic. But fatigue was a distant memory the moment Jerusalem rose on the horizon – a shimmering mirage against the unforgiving sun. For years, I had dreamt of this moment, of kneeling at the holiest ground in Christendom.

Reaching the city gates was an ordeal. Merchants hawked their wares with a cacophony of calls, while pilgrims like myself jostled for entry. Towers of gleaming white limestone, recently built by King Otaspes himself, loomed overhead. These weren't the crumbling Persian walls I had envisioned, but a testament to the Achaemenid’s unwavering faith. Inside, the city was a kaleidoscope of sights and sounds. Monks in simple brown robes hurried past, their faces etched with piety. Merchants, likely from far-off Persia, displayed vibrant silks and exotic spices. The air hummed with a multilingual prayer, a chorus of Aramaic, Greek, and Eranian rising from every corner.

My destination, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, was a magnet for pilgrims. The once-humble structure had been transformed into a breathtaking basilica. Sunlight streamed through stained glass windows, casting rainbows on the polished marble floors. Pilgrims, some weeping openly, knelt before the Ark of the Covenant. The air crackled with an intangible energy, a sense of shared faith and reverence.

As much as the locals tried to hide it, the city was not purely God’s city. Tensions simmered beneath the surface. The Jewish quarter hummed with an undercurrent of resentment. The destruction of their synagogue by the king’s men remained a fresh wound. Soldiers patrolled the streets with an air of unease, constantly on guard against Jewish spies from Samaria. One evening, I found myself at a bustling tavern, sharing a meal with fellow pilgrims. Tales of bandits roaming the desert roads and skirmishes with Arab raiders fueled our conversation. Despite the dangers, a sense of camaraderie bound us. We were all pilgrims, drawn by an invisible thread to this holy city.

As I prepared to leave Jerusalem, a bittersweet feeling settled upon me. The city had exceeded my expectations – a living testament to the sacrifice of Christ. Yet, it was also a place of conflict, a microcosm of the wider world's struggles. Jerusalem had etched itself into my soul, not just as a holy city, but as a tapestry woven with faith, conflict, and the enduring spirit of humanity. A part of me would forever remain amidst the bustling streets and holy sites of the City of God.”



Ordanes the Quarreller (492 AD - 509 AD)

In his initial years, Ordanes focused on securing his power within his new kingdom, developing the loyalty of an army trained by his brother and replacing the administration of the city and the rural provinces with his men. With the pieces in place, the king would begin his wars with the Jews of the East, breaking their kingdom and subsuming them within his domain. He would also turn his attention northwards, capturing the wealthy cities of Beirut, Tripoli and Damascus from the Metilius family of Syria. Within his court, they began to call him the ‘Quarreller’ as he often used slights and disagreements to find cause for war or to reprimand disobedient vassals. To the houses that had sworn loyalty to him, they found that his promises were not worth the breath it had taken to utter them. He reduced their influence in court and curbed their freedoms in administering their own lands. With the taxes of the City of Jerusalem, Ordanes had no issues raising the money to keep his soldiers loyal and well-equipped.

Ordanes the Quareller.png

Fortunately for them, Ordanes would be struck down by pneumonia and draw his last breath in 509 AD. By this point, his marriage to a Roman princess (a story deserving it’s own story starting with Ordanes striking up a friendship with her Romano-Germanic Kingly brother on pilgrimage in Jerusalem) had seen two children born, a boy and a girl.

Ordanes dies by pneumonia.png


Darius of Jerusalem (509 AD - 524 AD)

Screenshot 2024-07-08 114322.png

Darius was a boy of ten when he took the throne. Given more to philosophy and theology, he sought to ensure that his rule would be a model of Christian kingship. Charity and almsgiving were characteristics of his reign. In his quest to synthesise faith and rulership, he sought to homogenise the practices of his people. This often gave rise to uprisings by those who were oppressed by the new measures and even a few attempted assassinations on the king himself.

In an act of piety, he married a Matrona, a lowborn lady and pilgrim from Hispania, who had caught his eye and presented her as a showcase of God’s blessing on the small and meek – that they could rise far in God’s Kingdom on earth. With each act of piety, he ingratiated himself with the zealots and members of the Church. Jerusalem, already a hotbed of religious fervour, easily gave rise to legends and prophecy. Among these, there were a few focused on the Achaemenid line and how Christianity came to them through the voice of an angel. Darius would encourage the spread of this belief and how it was foretold that the Achaemenids were destined to take Arabia in the name of Christ.

Angelic initiation.png

Despite the assassination attempts and plans for war, Darius would meet his end in the most ignominious manner. Thrown from his panicked horse while return from a minor errand in Nablus, the king landed on his head and broke his neck. He survived just long enough to reach Jerusalem to pass his crown and signet ring to his only surviving child, Otaspes, who teared uncomprehendingly at his fallen father and the courtiers around him who were either swearing oaths of loyalty or preparing the body for the funeral to come.

Death of King Darius.png
 
  • 3Love
  • 2Like
Reactions: