The best player for each country

[unmerged(10915)]

Well really, if a real list of this kind should be made, each player should be given a summary of each and every country hes played as well as an in-depth analysis by every other player hes played with. Noone has the very same though pattern as his neighbour and noone reacts to the same situations in the same way. Since a summary like this would demand like a book for every member of the community, this way with threads is much better .
And has been stated before, these threads are not ultimate judges, they are only meant for players who havent played with other players to get a gist of how skilled they are so they arent caught with complete surprise.

 

[Slargos]

Well really, if a real list of this kind should be made, each player should be given a summary of each and every country hes played as well as an in-depth analysis by every other player hes played with. Since this would demand like a book for every member of the community, this way is much better .
And has been stated before, these threads are not ultimate judges, they are only meant for players who havent played with other players to get a gist of how skilled they are so they arent caught with complete surprise.

I understand what you're trying to say, but you're wrong.

 

[unmerged(10915)]

I understand what you're trying to say, but you're wrong.

Ok, i win .

 

[Fredrik82]

Even better, Fredrik doesn't seem to be represented.

I'd would start with the pope
And then i take over NL after you quit after first session

 

[unmerged(18425)]

Fal, you've yet again disappointed me. :shakes head sadly:

You went AWOL for weeks and return to say this to me?

 

[unmerged(10894)]

This is the roster i want in Battlefront 4

My list!

• Denmark - Bocaj
• Sweden - Babúr
• England - The Archduke
• France - Tonio
• Spain - BiB
• Portugal - Barnius
• Russia - RedPhoenix
• Brandenburg - King John
• The Netherlands - Slargos

I'm touched that you think I need that competition as Denmark.

I agree with Damocles when he said that it's just how people are wired. Once you've played eu2mp for a while, skills start to level out, and then the only difference is how people use them.

For me, the defining difference is whether you play a minor, or a major, better. The majority of the time, you'll get the likes of Beli, Damo, Dago, or Fred who make some awesome first-rate powers. A little less commonly you get the ones like Tonio or Drake that can turn the worst off nation into a global powerhouse. Occasionally players like John will come along that can do either with proficiency.

I really hate to say which nations suit certain players because everyone plays so differently. Every nation has the ability to take multiple paths, and each player will do that to a different degree of proficiency.

 

[Slargos]

You went AWOL for weeks and return to say this to me?

I exaggerate.

I'm not disappointed.

Merely amused.

 

[Rezag]

I have to say my player list would be completely different only 1-3 of these so agressive and power hungry players would get to it as in my experience the more there is from these list more will be need replacement during game just too many big egoes to fit in one game but that just me I would have far more those "normal" players and so less trouble .

 

[unmerged(10915)]

Occasionally players like John will come along that can do either with proficiency.

:rofl:

 

[unmerged(10894)]

:rofl:

He manages to achieve quite a lot between (or rather, during) his incessant wars.

Anyway, it all comes down to personal opinion. As it stands, this community is too big to fit in one game (imagine if it weren't though ), and not everyone plays with everyone else, so anything listed in here won't be truly objective. It's nice to have these sort of threads though, objective or otherwise.