• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
The war ended and that's the best thing. The loss of morale amongst most of the Imperial formations is an issue Curcuas will seek to address before he has to fight another war.

The discussion between Grand Domestikos and Emperor on the subject will be fascinating.
 
Structure and workings of the early 18th century colonies of the Roman Empire​

Following the Russo-Greek war, the Bourgeoisie within the Empire were greatly upset due to them seeing another bloody, though much shorter, war fought for no gains or purpose. The Emperors opposition began to grow more vocal in the parliament, and their numbers swelled somewhat, increasing the stress on the Emperor.
Despite the war however, the Imperial Treasury was full, and the Empire continued to prosper. Constantinople and Alexandria, the two largest cities within the Empire reaped the endless flow of valuable trade goods from across the world, ranging from common necessities such as grain and fish, to the more luxurious such as spices and slaves.

Though serfdom as an institution within the Empire was by and large gone by the early 18th century, the slave trade of Africa was at its peak. Tens of thousands of slaves came through Alexandria every year, as those wealthy enough to own them paid substantial amounts of solidus to the slave holders for each man they bought.
The solidus, though subplanted by the hyperpyron under the early Komnenos Emperors, had been reinstated during the 16th century with the rise of the Empire’s prosperity, and it’s ability to once again mint the relatively thick cold coinage without fear of it being debased.

The slaves in Africa were obtained by bartering with the willing tribes of the East-Africa region, exchanging weapons and other European goods for some of the tribe’s healthy young men and women. The tribes used the weapons against their rivals, while the slaves were taken back to Europe to be sold in various markets.
Though the Empire essentially claimed control over much of Eastern Africa, this control was only because the tribes of the region found the trade with the Empire beneficial. The Roman military presence in East Africa at this time was usually no more than 5,000 armed soldiers, hardly enough to maintain a strict control over the region.

Though there were some Greek colonies in the region, these were by far in the minority, and the laws of the land were still generally in the hands of the tribal chieftains. This however didn’t mean the Empire was unable to exert some influence over the area when the need for it arose.
When the Empire first defeated the various African Sultanates of the region, most of the African tribes were Muslim. However the Empire adopted a trade policy designed to encourage their conversion to Orthodoxy.
In essence, if the Empire for a single high quality slave gave a Muslim tribe 30 rifles, then for the same quality of slave, it might give an Orthodox Christian tribe 50 rifles.

Many of the African nobles, seeing that Islam might no longer be in their political and economic interests, gladly “converted” to Orthodox Christianity in order to exploit the bias in trade and gain an advantage over their still Sunni rivals.
Though there was some resistance to this bias in the form of attempts to drive the Greeks out of a certain region or to scare them into cooperation, the Empire was usually able to put these revolts down by employing friendly Orthodox tribes in the area to fight for them or as a supplement to their limited military presence in the area.
This worked well, as in essence they had Africans themselves projecting Imperial authority over rebellious regions, and saving them the cost of having to send large numbers of soldiers to the dark continent.

Though the authority of the Empire over its African colonies might have indeed seemed tenuous and at times could be, in general it proved to be effective and stable, as the various rulers in Constantinople realized that often times shrewd politics and clever trade policies can gain you control over a people far better than bullets.
By the early 18th century, the Empire’s hold on Africa was better than it had been 30 years prior, as old loyalties to the Kingdoms annexed by Alexios VI (1623 - 1660) gradually faded and more people came to accept the current situation. Various other European powers had begun colonizing the coast of Africa as well, but their colonies still paled in size to those of the Empire.

The flow of various spices was also extremely important to Imperial trade, and from Africa and their colonies in India and Malaysia hundreds of different kinds of spices passed through Alexandria each year, further enriching the city.
In India, the Imperial East Indies company flourished, its economic capital of Alexandreia(Note the extra ’e’) in Mangalore booming with a Greek population of nearly 45,000 in 1728. The large Greek population of the city allowed the Empire to project a fare more direct control over their Indian territories as opposed to those in Africa.

As their Indian possessions were less substantial than those in Africa, Greek governors were installed in the colonies there to rule over the population. While the African tribes still ruled over their lands, only “In the Emperor’s name”, the Marathi people along the western coast of India were directly controlled and kept in line by the Imperial military and the appointed governors.
From Alexandreia in Mangalore an army of 10,000 soldiers kept control of the company’s possessions. This army, though the demographics fluctuated somewhat, were in general composed of about 6,000 Greeks, and 4,000 Orthodox Marathi soldiers. Though when the colony at Mangalore was first established, significant cooperation with the native population of the region was essential, as it expanded and grew, they were able to take the lead and conquer further territories.

While revolts would on rare occasion spring up, the Imperial Army was usually able to swiftly put them down and restore order to the colonies. Intense preaching by Orthodox Missionaries also helped to subdue the native populace.
As more people were converted to Orthodox Christianity, their tendency to revolt against Imperial rule greatly lessened as such an action would be considered a grave sin. To a religious people such as they, it was enough to be an affective deterrent, and kept the peace within Imperial India.

Religious conversion was often used by the Empire in order to gain a better control over the native population in the colonies. Although when compared to other colonizing powers direct persecution of different religious groups was extremely light, the application of economic pressure was often used by the Empire.
The majority Hindu population was taxed heavily and was also paid less for work by the Orthodox Christian governors in the colonies, and this coupled with the constant preaching of the Orthodox Missionaries helped to convert more people to the state religion.

The Empire’s Malaysian colonies were also an important source for the various spices, however their value was not as high as the Indian or African colonies, and this, coupled with their rebellious population really only made them worth while as a means of projecting the Empire’s power into the far east.
The Empire’s Caribbean and West-African colonies were mostly taken as important sources of sugarcane and ivory, and their populations were reasonably placid and cooperative. In the Caribbean’s case, the population was entirely Greek, so conflicts were extremely rare.

From the Caribbean in the west, to Malaysia in the East, the Empire imported various goods, as well as many native works of art as ‘curiosities’. This lead to a great leap in innovation within the Empire, as foreign and previously unheard of ideas about astronomy, agriculture and government were debated among the learned minds of the Imperial elite. The Roman Empire of the 18th century was an Empire in every sense of the word. It was ruled by a powerful Emperor in Constantinople, it ruled over various ethnic groups across the world, and it ruled over both continuous territories in Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, as well as discontinuous territories across the world.

At its height, the Roman Empire was the undisputed dominate superpower of its era, though the rising star of their allies in Britain was beginning to threaten this title…

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There you go. Read and reply. I'll do a post to reply to some of your comments later today. :)
 
Wow that's alot more colonies then I remamberd, what exactly are your holdings in Afrika?

Good to see the war in russia end so fast, but as you your self said with littel gain (in game terms was it a white peace?)

I'll be waiting for the next update.
 
Okay, time for some replies. :)

EightDeer: The whole Imperator event sequence was an AGCEEP-made line. Though I modified the dates a bit as they were happening before Peter historically took the title of Tsar.
As to what the average peasant likely thought of the war with Russia, I would imagine it would have been rather troubling to them on some level, but still not as much as getting the next harvest in. ;)

Maximilliano: You know, its interesting that you're the only one who has thus far entertained that possibility.

Basileios I: Treason! You shall be shot for suggesting such a thing! :p But I can't see a revolution like that happening in Byzantium unless somebody really screws up.

Andreios II and Saulot: Thanks to both of you for all the praise, it is much appreciated. :) I'm glad you're both enjoying the story.

Rirre: Here is a pic of my African colonies. There was a pic of them earlier in the thread as well.

ScreenSave4.jpg


Ethiopia is a vassal by the way. The Emperors allow them their independence due to the faithfulness they've shown to Orthodoxy even when surrounded by Muslims for hundreds of years.

Chief Ragusa: Thank you for your consistent and informative replies. They've helped me with a number of important decisions throughout my AAR. :)

I look forward to reading many more of all of your replies. :)
 
Mmmmm very organised colonies you've got there :D

Two questions I've just thought of:

Do you intend to fight in the Seven Years War? Or will the Bourgeoisie oppose it enough for Mikhail to reconsider intervention?

And would you consider helping out the British when the American Revolution breaks out? Seeing as the Empire is the quintessential example of a monarchy, I'm sure the Romans would feel inclined to nip any foolish republican ideas in the bud.

Or perhaps by 1774 Rome and Britain will have grown apart... what a pariah the Empire would seem then if they intervened on the American side after Saratoga instead of France!
 
Andreios II said:
Mmmmm very organised colonies you've got there :D

Two questions I've just thought of:

Do you intend to fight in the Seven Years War? Or will the Bourgeoisie oppose it enough for Mikhail to reconsider intervention?

And would you consider helping out the British when the American Revolution breaks out? Seeing as the Empire is the quintessential example of a monarchy, I'm sure the Romans would feel inclined to nip any foolish republican ideas in the bud.

Or perhaps by 1774 Rome and Britain will have grown apart... what a pariah the Empire would seem then if they intervened on the American side after Saratoga instead of France!

Now now, all of that would be spoiling the story. ;)
 
SeanB said:
Now now, all of that would be spoiling the story. ;)

Yeah yeah I know, I know :wacko:

By the way, is it possible to use the current roman flag as an avatar for these here forums?

If so, then could you let me know?
 
Continuing overview of the Empire during the early 18th century

Following the war with Russia, the Empire refocused its efforts on consolidating its colonies, taking advantage of the lull in hostile mainland politics during the 20s. India was of particular interest to Emperor Mikhael XI Palaiologos.
While the Imperial colonies in India were prosperous and relatively stable, the rest of the Indian subcontinent was in chaos. Following a brutal succession war, the Mughal Empire, the dominant power in India, began to crack at the seems. Rebellions swept over the once mighty empire, pushing its once mighty armies to their limits just trying to control the population of the country.

Muhammad Shah, the ruler of the Mughals during this period was an ineffectual leader, and was unable to hold his enflamed empire together following the death of Aarangzeb, the last “good” Emperor of the Mughals.
Aarangzeb’s extremist policies had caused a major rift between the empire’s Muslim and Hindu populations, as he introduced Sharia laws into the Empire, ending the tolerant reign of the Emperors who came before him. Though as a personal individual Aarangzeb was competent and skilled, his successors were not, and unable to handle the unstable situation that he left the empire in.

Following his death, several successive Emperors took the throne before Muhammad Shah was finally able to secure the throne on a more permanent basis. By now however the Mughal Emperors and their Empire were but a shadow of their past glory.
The Emperors were largely the puppets of powerful court officials, princes and other such men of importance within India, and this, combined with rampant rebellions caused their Empire, which at its height under Aarangzeb covered nearly all of India, to lose power and territories at a shockingly rapid rate considering the strength they wielded only decades earlier.

Though the Emperor in Constantinople did not wish to conquer large tracks of India, seeing the population as rebellious and unruly, he was able to exploit the chaos by further tightening his grip over the colonies, without having to fear Mughal retaliation.
The British however were the ones who really benefited from the collapse of the Mughal Empire, expanding their holdings throughout the subcontinent greatly. Though the Empire and Britain were allies, their growing influence in India was beginning to cause tension between them.

However, though the British had more raw territory in India than the Empire, the Romans were more consolidated in what they had. The majority of Mangalore’s population was Greek, while no British colony could claim such for the Anglo-Saxons.
However, the British had seized important strategic provinces from the collapsing Mughals, and were growing increasingly wealthy at the Empire’s expense. However the British and the Empire remained on good terms throughout the early 18th century, as for the time being their mutual interests outweighed their differences.

Though the Empire had espoused religious tolerance on the mainland since the late 15th century, most of the Emperors were still staunch followers of the Orthodox Christian faith, and even more so, staunch lovers of Greek culture.
Though the Palaiologid Emperors were open to western ideas when it suited their purpose, they strove to preserve the Greek heritage of the Empire always. They relocated Greek peasants and lower-end bourgeoisie from Greece-proper and settled them in Western Anatolia, Southern Italy and Sicily, Alexandria and even the Palestine region (that is, stretching basically over the territory of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem).

All of these regions had a majority population of Greek people by the early 18th century. Though they had granted a great amount of tolerance for the Turkish and Italian peoples, they never wanted it to be forgotten that the Empire had Hellenistic roots.
Greek was still the official language of the Empire, and at the Imperial Universities at both Constantinople and Beirut, Greek and Roman history were taught as one. Greek culture flourished throughout the world due to the Empire’s colonies, as Greek settlers were went around the word to help consolidate the Empire’s hold over their new colonies and exploit them to their full potential.

The Orthodox Church, in spite of the turmoil between Constantinople and St. Petersburg in the 1720s, was stronger than ever. The Empire ruled all five of the original Patriarchs, Constantinople, Antioch, Jerusalem, Alexandria and even Rome.
However, other than Russia, the Empire was the only major Orthodox Christian country in the world, making the Orthodox Church a distinctly different creature from the Catholic or Protestant denominations.
Because the greatest majority of its faithful were under two large empires, rather than a plethora of Kingdoms and duchies, it gave the Church far more real authority when it came to passing laws and doctrines, assuming they could gain the Emperor’s support.

In addition to Greek Orthodox Christianity, an extremely large minority of the population were followers of Sunni Islam. Despite being under Imperial rule for over or nearly 200 years depending on the region, much of the Muslim population of Egypt, Iraq, and north Africa had remained Sunni in spite of the missionary work.
Before the reign of Emperor Alexios VI, these populations had been highly rebellious, the most notable example being the Great Arab Revolt in the early 1650s. For centuries, the Islamic World’s supreme religious leader was known as the Caliph. Before the Empire’s conquest of Egypt in the early 16th century, the Mameluk Sultanate held this title.

Following its conquest by Ibrahim however, remnants of the Sultanate’s Aristocracy (the Beys of Egypt) as well as the Caliph himself, fled to the Hedjaz, making the Islamic Holy City of Mecca their new capital.
The Empire allowed them to do this as a part of the Treaty of Alexandria, which guaranteed the safety of the cities Mecca and Medina, and the Hedjaz in general in exchange for the Beys leaving Egypt and not encouraging rebellion in its populace. This treaty was upheld for over 100 years, until Emperor Alexios XI invaded the Hedjaz.

When the Caliph began promoting anti-Roman teachings in the 1620s, due to the short but oppressive reign of Regent Nikolaos Palaiologos (adopted uncle of the future Emperor Alexios) the Emperor, upon ascending the throne in 1623 decided that it was time to reign the Caliph in before he was able to inflame the large Arab population of the Empire to the point of armed rebellion.
After he defeated the Hedjaz, he made it a satellite of the Empire, knowing that directly annexing it, and Mecca in particular, would cause mass rebellions against the Empire, and likely incite a Holy War with its Muslim neighbors.

Following this, the Caliph became a puppet of the Emperor, who advocated peace with the Empire and the cooperation of its Muslim population. At first however, few Muslims acknowledged the Caliph in the Hedjaz.
Eventually the Great Arab Revolt broke out, and after the bloody conflict, the Muslim population was finally pacified, having suffered greatly in the conflict. They were also made more cooperative by the relatively merciful treatment they received by the Emperors following the conclusion of the war.

By the 1720s, most of the Muslims within the Empire’s borders accepted the Caliph in Mecca’s authority. It was also generally accepted by Morocco, another Imperial vassal. Al-Hassa and Persia, though also under the protection of the Empire were Shiite Muslims, and part of the terms of their vassalization following their defeat was that they did not have to acknowledge the Sunni Caliph.
Outside of the Empire and its Sunni vassals however, few accepted the Caliph’s rule as legitimate, claiming he lost his true claim to the title when he submitted to the “Christian Infidels”.

The Arabian states, as well as the Muslims in India and Indonesia did not acknowledge him in general, and the Mughal Emperor Aarangzeb attempted to claim the title of Caliph himself, and actually had the strong support of many influential Muslim leaders throughout the orient and beyond.
However with his death, the Mughal state began to collapse as stated before, and the following Emperors thought less about claiming the title of Caliph and more about just trying to survive. With no other realistic claimants to the Sunni Caliphate, the Roman Empire’s hold on its Muslim territories was secure.

The remaining Turkish population in western Anatolia were now in the minority to the resettled Greeks, though they remained the majority in central and especially eastern Anatolia. The Turks in western and central Anatolia were mostly Orthodox Christians, while those further east remained Sunni Muslim.
The Turks had never been particularly rebellious after the fall of the Ottomans however, and their conversion was mostly natural as Greek and Turkish cultures constantly interacted with each other over the many years.

Throughout the 1720s, Emperor Mikhael XI continued to reform the Empire’s government, something each previous Emperor had gradually done since the mid 15th century. He eliminated unused offices, merged those that he felt were redundant, and essentially continued the process of streamlining the Empire.
Though many Dynatoi lost their titles and offices in the process, they all mostly knew it would come sooner or later at point, as the streamlining reforms had been taking place for over 250 years. The Emperors generally tried not to introduce their reforms too quickly, in order to maintain stability, but by the early 18th century, the process was mostly complete.

As stated previously, while they remained staunch adherents of Greek culture and beliefs, the Palaiologid Emperors had shown themselves to be very open to new innovations and ideas from the west, and were more than willing to incorporate them into the state if they felt that they were superior to the preexisting system.
Many of the Dynatoi balked at these changes, feeling them too “un-Roman” and resented the presence of Latin teachers in the Universities of Beirut and Constantinople, educating their children to “act like French and Italian dandies”.

These reforms and the general openness of the Empire to foreign ideas lead to it gaining a notable lead on the west in many fields. While Britain had a similar openness and generally kept up with the Empire, this was not the case for the rest of Europe.
In France’s case for example, they were the equal of the Empire in terms of their army’s training, equipment and doctrine, but were far behind on the quality of their navy. The rest of Europe generally followed this pattern, but though the difference was certainly noticeable, it was not so overwhelming as to make the Empire invincible.

Emperor Mikhael XI was a great patron of the arts as well, and filled the Imperial Palace with many great works from the renaissance as well as more recent times. He loved French and Italian artwork in particular, much to the chagrin of the Dynatoi in his court, who much preferred to see the palace filled with Greek art.
The Emperor also promoted western Opera during his reign, paying with his own vast wealth for dramatic renditions of the most popular works of his time. He also made attendance free for all, encouraging both high standing Noble and lowly peasant alike to view the works, though the latter were more often confused than enchanted or enlightened.

Aside from the war with Russia, Mikhael’s reign was a peaceful one, where the Empire focused inwardly, finally throwing off the last vestiges of its bloated government from centuries past, and marching strongly forward into the Enlightenment.
However, more succession troubles were on the horizon, with Poland this time. Augustus II of Saxony’s health was starting to weaken, and his successor was the interest of several of the major players of Eastern Europe…

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There you go. Read and Reply. And yes Adrianos II you can use the Byzantine flag as you like, I don't own the rights to it or anything. :p
 
Nice update Sean, giving a good survey of the empire and some parts of the world.

But I feel like I'm missing something, in the begining of the update your speaking about strenthening your hold in India but then you don't say how that is done.

Anyway I'll be waiting for the next update.
 
On April 14th, 1732, Emperor Mikhael XI Palaiologos died of natural causes at the age of 67. His reign saw many great changes for the Empire, including the formation of the Imperial Parliament. Despite his staunch absolutism and determination to keep his authority supreme at any costs, he is seen by many as a good example of Enlightened Despot. He was a great patron of the arts, and helped to throw off the last trappings of the Empire’s old and bloated bureaucracy, completely reforming it into a modern state, rivaling both France and Britain in its structure.

The Emperor was succeeded by his son Alexios VII Palaiologos. Perhaps even more so than his father, Alexios was a great lover of western art and opera, and upon his coronation, he held lavish art exhibit deliberately similar to the Salon de Paris that was held in France to exhibit popular contemporary and renaissance art.
The coronation itself was extraordinarily extravagant, coming to a cost of nearly 5 million American dollars by today’s standards, which would have been a sizable portion of that years treasury no doubt.

The splendor of the Imperial Court during Alexios’ reign was at an all time high. Foreign dignitaries and ministers wrote of the stunning opulence when they were allowed an audience with the Emperor, as the wealth and prosperity of the Empire was evident in the splendor that Alexios VII constantly surrounded himself with.
Despite his luxurious tastes, he was said to be an incredibly sharp and intelligent individual, and his rule reflected this. His father had left a government that was streamline and efficient for the day, so little reforms were required on the new Emperor’s part. However Alexios faced many of the same problems that the previous Emperor had, mainly with the Bourgeoisie.

Though the Emperor still had the support of the majority of the Burghers, this was gradually shrinking as more began to espouse support for the Imperial Parliament being given real power, similar to Britain’s own powerful legislature.
Though Alexios VII believed in the Meritocracy of the Empire, he still was strongly opposed to limiting the power of the throne. He felt that doing so would make it impossible for him to rule the Empire effectively, and feared that the Empire could be hurt by the conflicting interests between himself, the Burghers, and the Dynatoi.

In order to win the support of much of the opposing Bourgeoisie, he lowered their taxes significantly, making it up by increasing that of the remaining thematic counts, whom saw another dramatic decline in their numbers thanks to this.
He also abolished several trade taxes that were not necessary but still were detrimental to the traders. This helped to win back the support of some of the Bourgeoisie who had joined the opposition against him.
He hoped that through such measures he would be able to keep the Bourgeoisie from becoming too contentious. Their wealth and trade was still the most influential aspect of the Empire’s economy, and Alexios knew he had to play a careful game with them.

On February 1st, 1733, Augustus II of Poland died. While he had attempted to make the Polish-Lithuanian throne hereditary within his family, he failed and upon his death several candidates were selected as possible future Kings.
While Augustus II’s son, Augustus II of Saxony was his fathers personal choice before his death, the other powers were somewhat against Poland becoming hereditary and were against his candidacy. France preferred Stanislaus Leszczynski, the father-in-law of King Louis XV. The King of France hoped to renew the strong alliance that his Kingdom had once possessed with Poland as a way of counteracting the “unchecked” power of Austria and Russia in Central and Eastern Europe.

Austria and Russia however were naturally against this, and threw their support behind Emmanuel of Portugal, who had gained the support of the two powers by his frequent visits to their courts throughout his early adulthood, and for his service in the Austrian army under Prince Eugene of Savoy.
However, when it came time to elect the next King of Poland, Russia and Austria found that support for Emmanuel amongst the Polish nobility was greatly lacking. Now desperate to stop the election of Stanislaus, they threw their support behind Frederick Augustus II of Saxony, who was a far more realistic choice, being the son of the previous King.

In addition to this, both powers mobilized their armies in an attempt to intimidate the Polish Diet into electing their candidate. This ploy failed however, and they proceeded to elect Stanislaus as the new King of Poland.
In response, a Russian army lead by Field Marshal Peter Lascy invaded Poland in support of their candidate, Frederick Augustus. This invasion was not without its supporters within Poland, however, though they were a minority. Duke Michael Wiśniowiecki, the previous King’s Chancellor, as well as a group of nobles from the Lithuanian Magnates elected Frederick Augustus as King Augustus III of Poland.
Though the group was by far in the minority, both Austria and Russia quickly acknowledged him as the rightful King.

The Russian army quickly captured Warsaw, and installed Augustus III on the throne. Stanislaus was forced to flee from Poland to France after a series of Russian victories, and Poland was placed under the control of Augustus.
Although a resistance was formed in the name of Stanislaus, they proved to be incapable of defeating the Russians, and were easily scattered. This more or less ended the war in Poland, however the fighting continued in the west.

In Constantinople, Emperor Alexios XII Palaiologos was troubled by the invasion of Poland by Russia. He had, since his ascension to the throne, been attempting to ease relations with Russia and its new Empress after the conflict between his father and Emperor Peter I during the early 1720s.
While the Emperor feared that the chaos in Poland could cause instability in the territories bordering Poland, he had no desire to become involved in the war. He cared not for who sat on the Polish throne, and generally wanted to distance himself from the conflict as it had very little to offer the Empire.

His Grand Domestic, Georgios Curcuas also recommended strongly against intervening in Poland, saying it would be a waste of the military’s resources and would either lead to a conflict with France and Spain, or with Russia and Austria.
Neither of these scenarios were desirable to say the least, especially with Poland secure under Russian control. While preventing France from gaining influence in Eastern Europe might have been worthwhile, the possibility of them doing so at that point was seen as highly unlikely given Russia’s strong presence in the east.

Moreover, the actual fighting in the war was over relatively quickly. By early 1735, the war had already been concluded for the most part, with Austria suffering several humiliating defeats at the hands of France, whereas France was halted by the arrival of a large Russian army near the Rhine, compelling both sides to come to terms.
Augustus III of Poland was recognized as the legitimate King by France and its allies, while Stanislaus was given the Duchy of Lorraine, which would later be directly annexed by France upon his death. Most historians agree that Emperor Alexios’ decision to not involve the Empire in this war was the right one, and better for all involved, as it could have potentially escalated the war into something much worse.

The Emperor in truth had no desire to expand the Empire, as he felt it had reached its zenith. Like the first Emperor Augustus, he felt that major expansion beyond what they already held would actually be detrimental to the Empire‘s security.
The Roman Empire was wealthy and prosperous, and House Palaiologos was without a doubt the richest Noble Family in all of Europe during this period. Alexios wished to preserve this wealth, for both the Empire and his House for many generations to come, and was weary of expanding further in Europe in particular, as he feared an alliance being formed against him should the other powers see him as a threat to the balance.

He was not opposed to further colonial expansion however, and worked tirelessly to further consolidate the Empire’s hold over its east African colonies. He continued to send willing settlers to the interior in order to strengthen Greek influence in the region, and to better exploit the colonies resources, in particular slaves and spices.
His father had already consolidated the Empire’s hold on its Indian territories by seizing more land along the western coast, and its Malaysian territories were in a relatively stable condition, though they would also remain rebellious.

The sugarcane plantations in the Empire’s Caribbean colonies flourished with the constant influx of new slaves, which kept shipments to Alexandria and Constantinople running smoothly. Overall, there was little to be done to the Empire externally during Alexios reign, as their control of the important straights and their wealthy colonies ensured that the Imperial Treasury was never in danger of going dry.
While from the outside the Empire appeared to be completely secure, internally the machinations of both the Empire’s noble families and now the Bourgeoisie too continued as they had for over 1,000 years. Despite the Empire’s political reforms, it would prove to be an extremely difficult task to undo an ancient history of treachery and intrigue that had become almost a tradition of the Empire itself…

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There you go, sorry for the slowness, but I'm sure you all know what this week is. :)
 
oh boy, will we see a glorious revolution in the Empire like in Britain? Best not too hold off the liberal reforms for too long... 1848 didn't end well for any of the parties involved.
 
Given the choice to be friends with Russia, intervention in support of the Poles was a non-starter.

The Bourgoisie do not seem to be reconciled with the autokrat and the Nobles form factions at the drop of a hat. This intrigue feels as though it is based on the Nobles fearing for their position. They've seen how the old Imperial Counts have been treated and must wonder when it will be their turn to be brushed aside.
 
The opening part of the War of the Austrian Succession

The alliance between the Empire and Britain had stood since the War of the Spanish Succession, and to a lesser extent since the 2nd Greco-Persian war in the 1680s. The two powers remained close allies throughout the first part of the 18th century, aiding each other in colonial expeditions and signing several trade agreements.
They also had supported each other in war, either directly or indirectly. The Empire’s close relations with England was one of the key motivations to its entry in the War of the Spanish Succession in the first place. When war broke out between the Roman Empire and Russia in 1722, Britain did not enter the war militarily, as it was not asked to, but did apply a trade embargo against Russia for the duration of the war.

Both powers had remained neutral in the War of the Polish Succession, and had focused on colonial expansion in India, and for the British exclusively, the Americas. However, rapid British successes in colonizing India, which the Empire had had a presence in since the early 17th century, began to cause tensions between the two allies to develop.
In the 1730s however, these tensions were still minor, and the two powers remained staunch friends. On October 23rd, 1739 however, the Kingdom of Great Britain declared war on Spain, using a Casus Belli that Emperor Alexios at first thought was a joke when his foreign minister informed him of it.

In 1731, an English Mariner named Robert Jenkins was bringing his Brig Rebecca back to Britain from the West Indies when the Spanish guarda-costa boarded his ship. The commander of the guarda-costa allegedly then slashed off one of Jenkin’s ears. When he finally arrived back in England, he sent his grievances to King George II.
Noone in Britain really paid the incident much mind when he first brought it to their attention, but in 1738 he pleaded his case to the House of Commons, aggrandizing the events and even presenting his severed ear to Parliament. He managed to bring the British Parliament to outrage against the Spanish, and under intense pressure, Robert Walpole declared war on Spain.

Britain wanted support from the Empire for their war, but the sheer “absurdity” of their casus belli made Emperor Alexios reluctant to come to their aide. Moreover, the Imperial Parliament was heavily against going to war with Spain over a cause they felt was foolish, and the Emperor was concerned that doing so would only serve to strengthen the number of Bourgeoisie opposed to him in the lower chamber.
The Emperor declined to directly go to war with Spain, but did apply a partial trade embargo against them in support of their ally. The Spanish, already having their hands full with Britain alone, could afford to do little to oppose the embargo.

It seemed as if the Empire had avoided war once again, but the complex politics of Europe were far from finished as the Great Powers on the mainland continued to grow ever more tense in each others presence.
In 1733, the Empire had signed the Pragmatic Sanction at the request of Austrian Archduke and Holy Roman Emperor Charles VI, recognizing his daughter Maria Theresa as his legitimate heir, who would inherit his Austrian lands upon his death. The other great powers had also, at different periods, signed the Pragma and agreed to accept her claims on the throne.

In late 1740, Emperor Charles VI died, and his daughter inherited the Austrian throne. Being his successor she inherited the titles Archduchess of Austria, Queen of Hungary, and Queen of Bohemia. This was an astonishingly large inheritance for a woman to receive, and though Prussia had recognized the Pragmatic Sanction in 1728, the current King in Prussia, Frederick II, felt this did not apply to him.
Without a declaration of war, the highly organized and professional Prussian army under Frederick II crossed into Silesia on December 16th. The Austrian garrison of the province, completely unprepared, was overran.

The Austrians were forced to hastily gather an army in an attempted to retake their lost province, and under Count Neipperg marched out of Moravia to crush the upstart Prussians. The Austrian army into Silesia and engaged in a series of maneuvers with the Prussian army before finally meeting in battle near the town of Mollwitz.
Despite the early retreat of their right wing cavalry, the intensely drilled and disciplined Prussian forces held the line and eventually routed the Austrians. While Prussia had in the past been seen as just another one of “the Germanies”, this victory over Austria proved that they were an emerging Great Power.

The Prussian infantry were said to be able to fire five shots a minute to an Austrian soldiers three. Even the disciplined soldiers of the Roman Empire could only manage four a minute. The battle of Mollwitz showed Prussia to be the newest power in Europe, and France eagerly sought an alliance with them.
Sweden was also convinced to launch its own invasion of Russia by the new alliance, wishing to prevent Russia from attacking Prussia. However this war went horribly for Sweden, with its army being crushed at the Battle of Villmanstrand by the now vastly superior Russian army. Sweden would suffer defeat after defeat in the war until it was finally forced to capitulate to the Russians in 1743, signing the Treaty of Turku.

As if their defeat by Prussia at Mollwitz was not enough, Austrian Bohemia was soon invaded by armies from France, Bavaria and Saxony. Against the large Anti-Austrian army, the Archduchy could do little in the way of defense at first.
However fortunes soon turned when a large Austrian army relieved their struggling garrisons in Bohemia, who were soon joined by Count Neipperg’s army, coming from Neisse. Interestingly enough, King Frederick II had struck a deal with Neipperg, known today as the agreement of Klein Schnellendorf. By this agreement, Neipperg agreed to surrender Neisse after a short mock siege. In exchange, his army was allowed to flee to Bohemia, where he could join the newly assembled force there in opposing the Anti-Austrian alliance.

Also, despite being denied their promised independence upon the death of the male Hapsburg line in Austria, Archduchess Maria Theresa was able to rise a willing force of ‘insurrectionists’ which greatly augmented the Austrian army with their skilled light infantry, which proved very effective on the battlefield.
However the French had managed to take the city of Prague in late November of 1741, after which the Bavarian Elector, who now had taken the title of Archduke of Austria, was crowned King of Bohemia as well. However their celebrations were cut short when in late December, an army under Austrian Field Marshall Khevenhuller won a series of rapid victories that nearly drove the Anti-Austrian alliance from Bohemia.

The Field Marshall then turned his sights on Bavaria, and on the day of the new Bavarian Emperor’s coronation, his capital of Munich surrendered to the Austrians, marking a rather humiliating defeat for him.
By early 1742, the remaining allies in central Bohemia were barely holding their ground against the Austrian army, while the army in Linz was captured by the Archduchesses forces. Emboldened by her successes, Maria Theresa revealed the Klein Schnellendorf agreement to Prussia’s allies in an attempt to cause friction between them, and consequently causing the fighting to resume between the two.

In the meantime, the French, desperate to open up a second front against Austria, demanded of Emperor Alexios VII the right to pass through Italy. When the Emperor refused, France and its allies declared war on the Empire, and invaded the Italian peninsula through Piedmont. While Emperor Alexios had wished to stay out of the conflict, seeing no potential gain for the Empire in it, he was now forced to defend himself from the anti-Austrian alliance.
Britain, already at war with France’s ally Spain, joined the war on the Empire’s side. With this action, the Roman Empire entered the War of the Austrian Succession…

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There you go, again sorry for the wait, had trouble thinking of a start for the war.
 
hmmm the empire just seems incapeble to stay out of big confrontations like this.

This war could be just as bloody as the last one was with france. But you shouldn't let the frogs get away so easely this time.... make them pay for this uncalled assult on the empire.