• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Black Guardian said:
I think we should handle them as secret weapons!!
We´re talkin about NUCLEAR Warheads! Powerful weapons, not every country can develop -> Secret Weapon Tree!
Ok, but what do you think about air tech tree?
 
Užičkibombarder said:
Ok, but what do you think about air tech tree?

It looks fine :)
Good work so far... I´m thinking about doing naval doctrines, but i´m not quite sure. :/
Maybee it´s better to work on some events instead?
I´ve not that much time during the weak. On the other hand, doing naval doctrines would be more helpful, wouldn´t it?

*thinking*
Black Guardian
 
Black Guardian said:
It looks fine :)
Good work so far... I´m thinking about doing naval doctrines, but i´m not quite sure. :/
Maybee it´s better to work on some events instead?
I´ve not that much time during the weak. On the other hand, doing naval doctrines would be more helpful, wouldn´t it?

*thinking*
Black Guardian
I think that it is better first to do tech trees and units (I am doing that), then the first version 0.1. Then we will do events.
It would be grea, if you can work on naval doctrines. Next I will do industry, naval and secret tech trees.
Can you make picture of secret tech tree?
 
techsweb3.jpg


Secret Weapon Tree...
I think we should add rocket facilities to Industrial Tree, where the question marks are.
I hope it´s logical which tech requires which one...

Nuclear Facilities can be researched without any event.
Events 1,2,3,4,5 needs the Nuclear-Facility-Tech they are connected with a line.
Tactical Nukes requieres events 1,2,3 and the latest nuclear facility...
Events 6,7,8 requires events 1,2 and 3, which enables the research of Tactical Nuclear Rockets. Furthermore ICBM-knowledge is needed to research these rockets.

To research ICBMs, you need Events 9,10,11,12....

and so on
 
Black Guardian said:
techsweb3.jpg


Secret Weapon Tree...
I think we should add rocket facilities to Industrial Tree, where the question marks are.
I hope it´s logical which tech requires which one...

Nuclear Facilities can be researched without any event.
Events 1,2,3,4,5 needs the Nuclear-Facility-Tech they are connected with a line.
Tactical Nukes requieres events 1,2,3 and the latest nuclear facility...
Events 6,7,8 requires events 1,2 and 3, which enables the research of Tactical Nuclear Rockets. Furthermore ICBM-knowledge is needed to research these rockets.

To research ICBMs, you need Events 9,10,11,12....

and so on
Great, realy great.
 
Ah, by the way...

GSM are Ground-Surface-Missiles - Missiles launched from the land to hit Sea-Targets, for example French Exocet-Rockets.
So the models should have high Naval Attack value (at least enough to course heavy damage at one ship).
 
Black Guardian said:
Ah, by the way...

GSM are Ground-Surface-Missiles - Missiles launched from the land to hit Sea-Targets, for example French Exocet-Rockets.
So the models should have high Naval Attack value (at least enough to course heavy damage at one ship).
OK.
 
I have to admit, that the progress of my work is very slow at the moment... i didn´t even started work on naval doctrines and won´t start this weekend, i guess.
It will be done latest next sunday, i hope thats okay.
 
It has been a long time since i heard news about this awesome looking mod.
Is it dead?
 
Kretoxian said:
It has been a long time since i heard news about this awesome looking mod.
Is it dead?


I don´t know (and i don´t hope so)
Užičkibombarder wasn´t online for a long time, and i won´t do anything as long as i don´t know that isn´t for nothing.
So, i guess, we have to wait for Užičkibombarders answer... :-/
 
Just wanted to lend any encouragement possible. The tech concepts are so good that you may even want to hold them over for other modern conflicts.
I'm guessing post-modern Aircraft will be things like the Joint Strike Fighter or SU-47? In that case, what will you use for Germany's aircraft?

Pictures for most modern units will be easy to find, but what about Germany? Use Bundswher pics?

I have one suggestion for ground forces; Special Forces units. The most needed type would really be something like the Ranger LRRPs, Marine Recon, Spetznaz, or standard SAS. Like MPs, they would lower partisan activity, but would also give a bonus to intel and artillery effectiveness (better spotting, radio proficiency, etc).
The second would be more on the intel side; subversive/liberation units, like the Green Berets. You could even take different branches with this, with Allied governments preferring direct action by small units, to Nazis using Jihadists, to the Communists using ideological paramilitary leaders.

Anti-Air by this point would be SAMs, but future AA gun can be bullets again, if you discover "Practical Rail-Gun Technology." That should also be a requirement for any future armored cars.
 
Last edited:
Land Land Land

Just had time to look at your maps, dont know if this stuff has already been mentioned or not.

1. Surely finland would be part of Scandinavia as after the war Hitler would have rewarded his allies by putting them in charge of this area.
2. Why does Yugoslavia still exist? it would and was broken up into smaller areas of control. Did hitler turn round to the croats and say "actually I've changed my mind. is it at all possible I can have the land back and put your oppressors back in charge?"
3.Where are Italy's gains, they haven't even got all of their cores. and they have lost part of their African possesions.
4.Not 100% sure who the different colours in africa are but...
If the allies and the axis had a stale mate then why have all of Britains colonies become independant? Surely with such a large hostile neighbour the British public would not have been so lethargic about holding their hard won empire? Was Neville Chamberlain brought back to life to specifically give away a number strategic positions and let our empire crumble?
5.How can the UK and US still be allied when it seems that the US has also taken part in the destruction of the empire by stealing our far eastern islands and provinces?
6.Why was Iceland given back to the Germans?
7.Has Germany been given land in Africa? If so why? Did one of their forays into the occult pay off and Posiden allowed them to dominate the oceans?

There may be other examples but I will wait to see what your have to say about these.

That said my views are like dust in the wind and have no standing unless you give them so. Also what ever happens I will no doubt end up playing this mod.
 
I am back. I am sorry, I had some internet problems, but know it is OK (I have Dail-up :( :mad: ) and I was away for two weeks . Mod is not dead. Right now I am makeing some leaders (not historical persons). What is done: ministers, units, tech trees 80%, map.

I have to admit, that the progress of my work is very slow at the moment... i didn´t even started work on naval doctrines and won´t start this weekend, i guess.
If you can, you can make naval doctrines.
I need help in industry and secret weapons. I will make graphic part of trees, but I have problems in what shoud I put in those.

Just wanted to lend any encouragement possible. The tech concepts are so good ... armored cars.
I do not think that those suggestions are possibl.
Will see about German units graphics.

Maybe you could ask the MDS2 team to borrow their unit graphics?
Will ask them.

Just had time to look at your maps, dont know if this stuff has already been mentioned or not... end up playing this mod.
1. I do not think that Finland would be part of the Scandinavia (Scandinavia is union of north german people).
2. Hitler did not invade Yugoslavia and Greece in WWII.
3. Italy was invaded by Allies.
4. I made this Africa because I wanted to be more interesting (wars in Africa, a lot of them).
5. USA did not took islnads in Pacific from USA, only from France and Japan.
6. Iceland is indepedence.
7. Germany got some lands in Africa (Cameroon, Congo, Namibia).