After reading Dev Diary #165, I am excited to have tributaries in CK again. That said, the third type of tributary available for non-nomad characters will not get inherited by the suzerain's heir upon their death. Surely this will have to do with the balance of the gameplay but in Iberia we have historical reasons for making these types of tributary contracts inheritable.
A brief historical context: as we can all see in the starting date of 1066, there was an alternation in the correlation of forces between Christians and Muslims in Iberia in the 11th century. The new Christian hegemony in the north encouraged a stronger pressure on the Taifa kingdoms and this resulted in a new type of political relationship: the imposition of Parias (a system of annual tributes). This system promoted Christian non-aggression but in exchange the Andalusian kingdoms recognized a certain vassal dependence on the Christians as protective kingdoms.
Ferdinand I was the architect of the unification of the Christian kingdoms of the North (internal feudalization and political expansion) but at his death, the territory was divided among his sons (starting date 1066 in CK3) equally in order of age:
Sancho II received Castile, territories conquered from Navarre and the parias of the taifa kingdom of Zaragoza.
Alfonso VI received Leon, Asturias and the parias of the taifa kingdom of Toledo.
Garcia II received Galicia and the parias of the taifa kingdoms of Seville and Badajoz.
My suggestions are:
1-Very Easy to do: make in 1066 the kingdoms of Taifas tributary to the Christian kingdoms without the need to start a war, since the Christian kings have already inherited that right. The kingdom of Zaragoza would be tributary of the kingdom of Castile, The kingdom of Toledo would be tributary of the kingdom of Leon and finally, the kingdoms of Badajoz and Seville would be tributary of the kingdom of Galicia. The tributary system wouldn't be inheritable but the start of the campaign would be much more accurate.
2-Harder to do: implement a unique mechanic in which the tributary contract is inherited in Iberia if the struggle is active.
A brief historical context: as we can all see in the starting date of 1066, there was an alternation in the correlation of forces between Christians and Muslims in Iberia in the 11th century. The new Christian hegemony in the north encouraged a stronger pressure on the Taifa kingdoms and this resulted in a new type of political relationship: the imposition of Parias (a system of annual tributes). This system promoted Christian non-aggression but in exchange the Andalusian kingdoms recognized a certain vassal dependence on the Christians as protective kingdoms.
Ferdinand I was the architect of the unification of the Christian kingdoms of the North (internal feudalization and political expansion) but at his death, the territory was divided among his sons (starting date 1066 in CK3) equally in order of age:
Sancho II received Castile, territories conquered from Navarre and the parias of the taifa kingdom of Zaragoza.
Alfonso VI received Leon, Asturias and the parias of the taifa kingdom of Toledo.
Garcia II received Galicia and the parias of the taifa kingdoms of Seville and Badajoz.
My suggestions are:
1-Very Easy to do: make in 1066 the kingdoms of Taifas tributary to the Christian kingdoms without the need to start a war, since the Christian kings have already inherited that right. The kingdom of Zaragoza would be tributary of the kingdom of Castile, The kingdom of Toledo would be tributary of the kingdom of Leon and finally, the kingdoms of Badajoz and Seville would be tributary of the kingdom of Galicia. The tributary system wouldn't be inheritable but the start of the campaign would be much more accurate.
2-Harder to do: implement a unique mechanic in which the tributary contract is inherited in Iberia if the struggle is active.
- 5
- 1