Stribog, this is an English-only forum. The mods do not allow ANYONE to post in any language besides English (except in the designated other language forums, but I believe there are only three: French, Spanish, and German). Also, I believe we have all agreed that in our game, nobody will be allowed in if they don't speak English for the majority of the time. This is to prevent a sense of isolationism and splintering, as well as to prevent cliques/seperate groups from forming. We're all playing together, but when only one person can understand both groups (BinTravkin), it feels like there are two seperate games going on, which is unacceptable. Therefore, I'm sorry, but, especially after what you and your friends did yesterday (suddenly leaving the game with little to no explanation and refusing to even explain it in Latin text to Bin), I will support you not playing in the game unless you speak English for almost all of the time. It is not personal whatsoever, but we cannot afford to have the players split so obviously in a game of this scale.
BY THE WAY (just to catch your attention after that big paragraph), I can post a thread in the EU2 forum about interest in a massive game from 1066-1920 (let's leave out HOI for now, people might think that far too ambitious), and, simply to attract more players for the time being and generate interest, I'll say the time is open for discussion (but I think that we can't really move the time too much, our current players must be able to participate). But, I'm not sure who would be able to do this better: Lurken or myself. While I on the one hand have a reputation for trying to start up hopeless causes (really just my numerous attempts at trying to pull the EU2 community into a game of this scale, before they or CK were ready). However, I can offer up the fact that I am in an ongoing game of such a scale and also that I have significant experience in CK, EU2, and Victoria multiplayer. I know not Lurken's reputation, but if Lurken would post to the thread sometime it probably wouldn't make a difference which one of us did it, and I'll try as I've got nothing to do right now.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
However, I'm debating what to name the thread: should I just say a 1066-1920 game, the name of the new game (which I believe should be more elaborate than The Great Game 2 or 3), or something else.
BY THE WAY (just to catch your attention after that big paragraph), I can post a thread in the EU2 forum about interest in a massive game from 1066-1920 (let's leave out HOI for now, people might think that far too ambitious), and, simply to attract more players for the time being and generate interest, I'll say the time is open for discussion (but I think that we can't really move the time too much, our current players must be able to participate). But, I'm not sure who would be able to do this better: Lurken or myself. While I on the one hand have a reputation for trying to start up hopeless causes (really just my numerous attempts at trying to pull the EU2 community into a game of this scale, before they or CK were ready). However, I can offer up the fact that I am in an ongoing game of such a scale and also that I have significant experience in CK, EU2, and Victoria multiplayer. I know not Lurken's reputation, but if Lurken would post to the thread sometime it probably wouldn't make a difference which one of us did it, and I'll try as I've got nothing to do right now.
However, I'm debating what to name the thread: should I just say a 1066-1920 game, the name of the new game (which I believe should be more elaborate than The Great Game 2 or 3), or something else.
Last edited: