• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Approve

This is probably the resistances most fortunate win. The logic we used to pick likely spies was completely wrong yet we somehow ended up winning.
 
Approve

This is probably the resistances most fortunate win. The logic we used to pick likely spies was completely wrong yet we somehow ended up winning.

Huh? How so?
Apart from the bit where we thought glio was a spy due to the way the first mission worked out, I don't see it..
 
Huh? How so?
Apart from the bit where we thought glio was a spy due to the way the first mission worked out, I don't see it..

Well that's what I meant. I assumed Glio was a spy and Aedan innocent and wanted Aedan on the team. If I had got the proposal I wanted we would have lost.
 
This is probably the resistances most fortunate win. The logic we used to pick likely spies was completely wrong yet we somehow ended up winning.

2 spies cannot win against 6 resistance members. Casting the deciding vote that let a spy-free mission 3 team through was an undeserved Christmas present from Cliges.
 
Well that's what I meant. I assumed Glio was a spy and Aedan innocent and wanted Aedan on the team. If I had got the proposal I wanted we would have lost.

I wasn't quite as convinced as you was. I had Glio still listed as less likely than Aedan. At the point I proposed that third team I had them both as possibilities, but I wasn't completely sold on it.

2 spies cannot win against 6 resistance members. Casting the deciding vote that let a spy-free mission 3 team through was an undeserved Christmas present from Cliges.

I don't think any other team would have gotten enough support unless it was the final proposal anyway.
But you do make a good point ..
 
accept
 
2 spies cannot win against 6 resistance members. Casting the deciding vote that let a spy-free mission 3 team through was an undeserved Christmas present from Cliges.
Well, yes. And 4 resistance can't win again 4 spies. Cliges have been hurting his own team for four games in a row, I think.
 
2 spies cannot win against 6 resistance members. Casting the deciding vote that let a spy-free mission 3 team through was an undeserved Christmas present from Cliges.

Well if that had happened I think we would have figured you guys out as spies as you were a confirmed spy and the fact cliges accepted almost won you the game but Gliomarto got lucky and drew that card.

Well, yes. And 4 resistance can't win again 4 spies. Cliges have been hurting his own team for four games in a row, I think.

I was sure you were a spy in the end as you started acting weird to me. Also he saved us last game.
 
Thanks for GMing, Falc.

I was sure you were a spy in the end as you started acting weird to me. Also he saved us last game.

I was certain Aedan was evil from round 3. He posted more than once that he found me suspicious and nobody else did; I think he was trying to capitalise on Randy's posts saying what I had done was silly, but not overtly spyish.
 
Thanks Falc for running this. Despite the insurgent players ;-)

I was certain Aedan was evil from round 3. He posted more than once that he found me suspicious and nobody else did; I think he was trying to capitalise on Randy's posts saying what I had done was silly, but not overtly spyish.

Ah, it was Aedan who said that.
I knew something was off about Aedan, just couldn't really put my finger on it.
 
I'd feel worse, but I think the lose for Spies was sealed with the unnecessary sabotage on mission 4.
 
I'd feel worse, but I think the lose for Spies was sealed with the unnecessary sabotage on mission 4.

Eh? Were you even following the game?

We all knew TNT was a spy before that. 100%. We just knew that he would be the only spy so we went ahead with a mission containing him in the interest of saving time.