Originally posted by Norgesvenn
I'm sorry, but I have a hard time taking this all too seriously. Possible? I dunno. Maybe. Likely? Not very. Proven? In no way at all.
The reason why it hasn't been proven is simple: There are no written records of there being Templars present. Why? Supposedly because the Templars were there in secrecy... it's all a conspiracy.![]()
you take all the fun out of speculation.
imho, it feels right, along the same lines as say, the "historical king arthur".
historical myth doesnt prove anything, but its, i think, worth chasing, just because its a good story. as i had said, there's no proof.
Last edited: