It appears my problem was self-created (an empty <mod>localisation/text1.csv I'd made during the height of Hurricane Sandy, before my laptop battery died.)
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I am, at least, not getting thousands of not found in localization errors reported.
One I'm not sure is a vanilla error, or a false positive (Meneth, can you comment?):
Do titles have cultures?
One I'm not sure is a vanilla error, or a false positive (Meneth, can you comment?):
This is in the Crusade CB, the relevant block is:
Code:
on_success_title = { #<- PREV for statement where error is reported
if = {
limit = {
has_holder = yes
holder_scope = {
religion = ROOT
}
}
holder_scope = {
gain_settlements_under_title = {
title = PREV
enemy = FROM
is_crusade = yes # Even if the title holder is not participating in the war, gain holdings occupied by all Crusade participants
}
}
}
if = {
limit = {
OR = {
has_holder = no
NOT = {
holder_scope = {
religion = ROOT
}
}
}
}
most_participating_attacker = {
gain_settlements_under_title = {
title = PREV
enemy = FROM
}
if = {
limit = {
primary_title = { is_primary_type_title = no } # Mercs, the Pope, Holy Orders, etc
PREV = { has_holder = no }
OR = {
NOT = { character = ROOT }
independent = yes
liege = {
tier = EMPEROR
}
}
}
usurp_title = PREV
if = {
limit = {
NOT = { culture = PREV } #<- Line where error is reported.
}
hidden_tooltip = { PREV = { conquest_culture = THIS } }
}
}
}
}
any_attacker = {
limit = { character = ROOT }
participation_scaled_prestige = 500
participation_scaled_piety = 1000
if = {
limit = {
religion_group = muslim
}
participation_scaled_decadence = -100
}
}
any_attacker = {
limit = { NOT = { character = ROOT } }
hidden_tooltip = {
participation_scaled_prestige = 500
participation_scaled_piety = 1000
if = {
limit = {
religion_group = muslim
}
participation_scaled_decadence = -100
}
}
}
ROOT = {
religion_authority = 0.2
}
FROM = {
piety = -100
}
}Do titles have cultures?
Definitely a false positive:
The event is, in fact, called, in one of the common/decisions files.
Can you post where it is called from? Currently it seems to be checking the "effect" clause of decisions, de_jure_laws, laws, dynasty_decisions, plot_decisions, gender_laws, succession_laws, and vassal_decisions.
@Meneth: Fixed the reading of the ValidatorSettings.txt file.
Okay, I lied, that one doesn't seem to be anywhere (probably should be though, regent is in on the plot is the comment before the event), but this one is in common/cb_types:
common/cb_types/00_cb_types.txt (several places):
events/rebellionadd_events.txt, line 2 ff:
Code:
letter_event = {
id = 555555100
Code:
on_add = {
hidden_tooltip = {
FROM = {
any_vassal = {
letter_event = { id = 555555100 days = 1 }
}
}
}
}Related to previous:
FROM is the ROOT of the calling CB, hence the character/title on whom war is being declared.
FROM is the ROOT of the calling CB, hence the character/title on whom war is being declared.
Hmm, can you also call events in on_add_title, on_add_posttitle, on_success, on_success_title, on_success_posttitle, on_fail, on_fail_title, on_fail_posttitle, on_reverse_demand, on_reverse_demand_title, on_reverse_demand_posttitle, on_attacker_leader_death, on_defender_leader_death, on_thirdparty_death?
Can event 555555100 use FROM to refer to the on_add clause, and if so, would the FROM refer to a character?
555555100 does, in fact, use FROM to refer to a character (the liege against whom the vassals are rebelling); I would assume the other clauses could also use it (Shaytana wrote rebellionadd_events and added the calls to the revolt CBs before he pulled his disappearing act.) This was inspired by (but not copied from) Wiz's civil war system for CK2+, so he may know more. FROM would be the defender, FROMFROM would be the attacker (I think), not sure if you could scope to a third-party claimant from a called event.
Hmm, for now I'll make everything refer to a character, except thirdparty death.
It appears events in the on_add clause of CBs breaks RC6:
Code:
on_add = {
hidden_tooltip = {
FROM = {
any_vassal = {
letter_event = { id = 555555100 days = 1 } #<- line 3262
}
}
}
}Grr, same mistake as I made earlier that Meneth reported... fix incoming
Code:
# 163 Illuyanka character modifier
character_illuyanka = {
potential = {
religion = illuyanka
}
trigger = {
religion = illuyanka
}
icon = 15
global_revolt_risk = 0.02
vassal_opinion = 5
church_opinion = 15
castle_vassal_tax_modifier = -0.1
temple_vassal_tax_modifier = 0.5
build_cost_modifier = -0.3
land_morale = 0.2
land_organisation = -0.1
city_levy_size = -0.1
city_vassal_max_levy = -0.1
temple_levy_size = 0.5
temple_vassal_max_levy = 0.5
monthly_character_prestige = -0.1
monthly_character_piety = 0.4
assassinate_chance_modifier = 0.05
arrest_chance_modifier = 0.05
diplomacy = -2
martial = 2
stewardship = -1
intrigue = 2
learning = 3
fertility = -0.1
ai_ambition = -20
ai_zeal = 90
ai_honor = 50
ai_rationality = -20
}Numahr (developer of the SELIN sub-mod for Lux Invicta) assures me that all those modifiers work.
Righty, time for some more false positives:
"There may be no duplications of a "culture" clause. (Are you missing an 'or' or 'not' wrapper?)
There were 2 duplicates.
[I2631|L149|C8]: culture = PREVPREV
[I2658|L150|C8]: culture = PREVPREVPREV"
I'm checking that it is the same as two different entities, which makes perfect sense. Referring to other scopes should not count as a duplicate, only referring to actual different cultures.
"Invalid node "any_direct_de_jure_vassal_title" in scope TitleCommand (value is: <a complex type>)" - any_direct_de_jure_vassal_title was added in 1.07
Invalid node "distance" in scope CharTrigger (value is: <a complex type>) - Distance "scope" (similar to character_event and opinion_modifier and such) was added in 1.07
I think that's all the false positives triggered by my mod.
"There may be no duplications of a "culture" clause. (Are you missing an 'or' or 'not' wrapper?)
There were 2 duplicates.
[I2631|L149|C8]: culture = PREVPREV
[I2658|L150|C8]: culture = PREVPREVPREV"
I'm checking that it is the same as two different entities, which makes perfect sense. Referring to other scopes should not count as a duplicate, only referring to actual different cultures.
"Invalid node "any_direct_de_jure_vassal_title" in scope TitleCommand (value is: <a complex type>)" - any_direct_de_jure_vassal_title was added in 1.07
Invalid node "distance" in scope CharTrigger (value is: <a complex type>) - Distance "scope" (similar to character_event and opinion_modifier and such) was added in 1.07
I think that's all the false positives triggered by my mod.
I believe this is a false positive.
Edit: Didn't notice the error on province = PREV in line 550, which was listed several lines below the one for line 570's province = PREVPREV.
Regardless, the event spawns units in the usurped province, so this should be considered a false positive.
Edit 2: the same syntax is used in the Muslim decadence invasions (id 91000 in decadence_events.txt)
Relevant code snippet:
Code:
new_character = { #<-Scope for below province = [PREV|PREVPREV] statements.
usurp_title = PREV
set_defacto_liege = THIS
if = {
limit = { ROOT = { tier = duke } }
wealth = 250
}
if = {
limit = { ROOT = { tier = king } }
wealth = 500
}
if = {
limit = { ROOT = { tier = emperor } }
wealth = 1000
}
spawn_unit = {
province = PREV #<- No error thrown here, despite scoping to same thing as below error-throwing statement
match_character = ROOT
match_mult = 0.17
earmark = prestige_revolters
}
create_character = {
random_traits = yes
dynasty = THIS
religion = ROOT
culture = ROOT
female = no
age = 18
attributes = {
martial = 10
}
trait = skilled_tactician
}
new_character = {
set_father = PREV
spawn_unit = {
province = PREVPREV #<- Above error thrown here
owner = PREV
match_character = ROOT
match_mult = 0.17
earmark = prestige_revolters
}
}Edit: Didn't notice the error on province = PREV in line 550, which was listed several lines below the one for line 570's province = PREVPREV.
Regardless, the event spawns units in the usurped province, so this should be considered a false positive.
Edit 2: the same syntax is used in the Muslim decadence invasions (id 91000 in decadence_events.txt)
Last edited:
Hopefully fixed
Hopefully fixed
Seems like the issue is that it expected a province target not a character target like new_character. Should be fixed.
Need to go now, here is somethign that might fix the above
http://www.mediafire.com/?70ou3rybegv6eqd
Note it still says RC7 because haven't the cahnce to deal with it yet.
If there are issues might be able to fix them in about an hour but then will be gone for about a day.
http://www.mediafire.com/?70ou3rybegv6eqd
Note it still says RC7 because haven't the cahnce to deal with it yet.
If there are issues might be able to fix them in about an hour but then will be gone for about a day.