Because it was (politically) unenforceable.
Not just politically, France simply lacked the economics/demographics to be the gendarme of Europe. If they would try to enforce they would have been bankrupt pretty quickly.
Because it was (politically) unenforceable.
it was ahead of its time.Because it was (politically) unenforceable.
eh. not really. just make the germans pay to keep up the treaty.Not just politically, France simply lacked the economics/demographics to be the gendarme of Europe. If they would try to enforce they would have been bankrupt pretty quickly.
eh. not really. just make the germans pay to keep up the treaty.
they also let the germans skip out on their war debt.They tried. It did not work.
they also let the germans skip out on their war debt.![]()
at least that's what the Germans were saying... cuz... you know... trustworthy guys over there in Berlin......because Germany saddled with war debt joins the soviets...which isnt a better choice, as far as they knew at the time.
Right?
at least that's what the Germans were saying... cuz... you know... trustworthy guys over there in Berlin...
German war debt payments were suspended in 1930, iirc.1923, not 1933, my dude
The Samnites should have been harsher on the Romans.It seems to me, from a potentially ignorant view point, that the Versilles treaty was the worst middle road, kind of like Caudine Forks, and from what I've understood the Western Powers were tough when they should have been soft and soft when the should have been tough. Namely in that they were tough on Weimar where they should have been soft to a democractic Germany, and they were soft on Nazi Germany when they should have been tough when Germany left the democratic fold.
But maybe that's just me with hindsight and I claim in no way to be an expert on the period. So its entirely possible that the Western powers did not have the capacity to be tough on Nazi Germany in the 1930s or that I simply lack a grasp on the situation in the 1930s. But there you have my current view on it.