-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
we'll try to start the game on tuesday the 21:st of november. Meaning in 4 days from this date
Just to remind u all this game will continue to 2007 and we don't want anyone to suddenly say, "yippie me need to do homework so i can't play anymore" or "hell with eu2, Eu3 is out i'll play that instead." if u know this will happen then u can resign at once.
This game only wants reliable players that will commit them self to the game
Nations will be decided on saturday or sunday. we will ofcourse see what nations u want but also take notice on the experience and ability of the players so it wont be to unbalanced.
PJL the game wont change time. sorry.
and Rules can be changed or reworked if it's not to everyone liking.
About the claim cores rule, My guess is that it would only include ur own provinces.
and yes everyone share ur prefered countries and will try to see to it that u'll have it.
Just to remind u all this game will continue to 2007 and we don't want anyone to suddenly say, "yippie me need to do homework so i can't play anymore" or "hell with eu2, Eu3 is out i'll play that instead." if u know this will happen then u can resign at once.
This game only wants reliable players that will commit them self to the game
Nations will be decided on saturday or sunday. we will ofcourse see what nations u want but also take notice on the experience and ability of the players so it wont be to unbalanced.
PJL the game wont change time. sorry.
and Rules can be changed or reworked if it's not to everyone liking.
About the claim cores rule, My guess is that it would only include ur own provinces.
and yes everyone share ur prefered countries and will try to see to it that u'll have it.
and BoB about loaning money to someone u can do that but only for 1 month has it says in the rules. U just have to rely on the player that he will payback after a certain date.
This is the Gold rule we came up with
Gold inflation. After a session ending after certain years (e.g. 1570 and 1650) inflation from gold will be edited in. The inflation assessed will be based upon the income from the gold provinces, not the number of provincess. In the edit request in the AAR the players will, after these sessions, report their annual income from gold providing you control these mines a full year. Then you get X% inflation for each Yd income (e.g. 0.5% for each 100d). If you fail to write this number in the edit request you will be assessed a high value, e.g. 1% for each province. Observe: this has nothing to do with the geographic location of the mine.
what's ur views on this
Gold inflation. After a session ending after certain years (e.g. 1570 and 1650) inflation from gold will be edited in. The inflation assessed will be based upon the income from the gold provinces, not the number of provincess. In the edit request in the AAR the players will, after these sessions, report their annual income from gold providing you control these mines a full year. Then you get X% inflation for each Yd income (e.g. 0.5% for each 100d). If you fail to write this number in the edit request you will be assessed a high value, e.g. 1% for each province. Observe: this has nothing to do with the geographic location of the mine.
what's ur views on this
i don't see why loaning somebody gold isn't alowed tbh , its beneficial for both the 1 loaning and the 1 asking the loan (unles he spends it in a stuppid way) and the intrests are far lower then most bankloans will ever be
-Lyko- said:Ok some Rules to discuss
Prov limit- Shall we have this rule or not? and if we do get it, shall it increase after a period of time.
No MA thru Asia and middleeast before a certain Date. good for some bad for others.
This game is focused on realible people so be ready for that.
If there are rules that u want to have in the game just bring it up for discussion.
Look on the land slider chooses, core and culture claims.
probaly should add a rule where players are only alowed to take x aount of provs in a war to avoid 1 playng turboannexing another tho shouldn't be a lame low number like 2 either tbh
perhaps max 4-5 cots count as 2 ?
adding a no Ma rule trough asia should probaly include africa but its a good rule in general
i'd suggest 1 exeption tho : alow Ma trough countrys that are your vassal
ok we will complete teh nations on sunday. if anyone got any views on the rules u'll have until tomorrow (this day is friday)
The loan rule stand. as even if u have good intentions people tend to abuse it in the wrong way.
I want a Prov rule like cot counts as 2 colonies as .5 and it will be something like 3 before X and 4 before X and 5 before X like usually
We will use random leaders and after a certain date people will be able to choose conquistadors or explorers. we'll have 3 leaders every session and max value will be set for both fire and shock but will increase further into the game.
The loan rule stand. as even if u have good intentions people tend to abuse it in the wrong way.
I want a Prov rule like cot counts as 2 colonies as .5 and it will be something like 3 before X and 4 before X and 5 before X like usually
We will use random leaders and after a certain date people will be able to choose conquistadors or explorers. we'll have 3 leaders every session and max value will be set for both fire and shock but will increase further into the game.
ok one proposition is that we delete all historical leaders.
they who do not say anything in the thread are assumed to agree with whatever suggestions has been made in the thread. We do not want anyone to quit before start just because he does not like a rule.
It would be nice if all that has posted their interest in playing would confirm this by a new post where they also tell us their views on the rules, if they have any views that is.
OK everyone who wants a pro rule in wars say so or it will not happen.
Claim core rule at the moment is tha tu can claim cores anywhere in th world without even owning it. My question is do u guys want that or that u could just claim ur own provinces.
PLz reply on this messege . Do we want historical leaders or not. being quite doesn't help later when u quit the game because of some rule. speak up for god sake
they who do not say anything in the thread are assumed to agree with whatever suggestions has been made in the thread. We do not want anyone to quit before start just because he does not like a rule.
It would be nice if all that has posted their interest in playing would confirm this by a new post where they also tell us their views on the rules, if they have any views that is.
OK everyone who wants a pro rule in wars say so or it will not happen.
Claim core rule at the moment is tha tu can claim cores anywhere in th world without even owning it. My question is do u guys want that or that u could just claim ur own provinces.
PLz reply on this messege . Do we want historical leaders or not. being quite doesn't help later when u quit the game because of some rule. speak up for god sake
I would prefere a game with historical leaders, but if the majority are in favour of deleting them then I won't really care
ok.. who will play in this game
This is the list i've got.
PJL will u enter this game?
Semlan what about u?heard rumours about FAL? will u sign up also.
Paul the great still intrested?
we need people to confirm, so we can put up a nation rooster.
This is the list i've got.
PJL will u enter this game?
Semlan what about u?heard rumours about FAL? will u sign up also.
Paul the great still intrested?
we need people to confirm, so we can put up a nation rooster.
-Lyko- said:
I can't enter if the time is going to be 1900 CET since I won't be able to make it by then.
Ok we wont use any historical leaders it seems.
instead of Historcial leaders we might use MT like we did in ToS. This will greatly increase warfare and the level of fun in the game. i've asked Daniel to rework the system alittlbit from the days in ToS.
IF u guys wants a MT system for the random leaders then will have it
instead of Historcial leaders we might use MT like we did in ToS. This will greatly increase warfare and the level of fun in the game. i've asked Daniel to rework the system alittlbit from the days in ToS.
IF u guys wants a MT system for the random leaders then will have it