How does Paradox Tinto compare to e.g. Paradox Arctic or Paradox Thalassic regarding company structure? It sounds like the latter are part of PDS while Tinto is not. What are the effects of this?
Tinto is its own studio, lead by Johan, in charge of EU4. They are working separate from PDS, they talk of course, they make the same kind of games after all, but they rarely work directly together. Afaik there is no one right now at PDS working directly with EU4 (except for maybe the central Clausewitz team since EU4 use the engine, and there can always be the exception of one person I don't know about, but I think you see my point!)
Arctic and Thalassic are right now working much more integrated with PDS, to support the development of existing games (specifically, Stellaris and CK3). Doesn't mean they won't have their own projects eventually, but for now their focus is helping PDS develop content for these games.
Hope that clarifies the difference!
Does this affect the unionization that PDS went through recently, or do all the new studios maintain their union agreements?
Not at all, the collective agreement affects all employees of Paradox in Sweden, regardless of their studio. And technically, the restructure of PDS hasn't changed much. Some people changed managers or teams, but no one was let go, and technically everyone is still working at PDS.
By the way, we haven't specified the timeline in
@Dnote original post, but this change of structure (Red, Green, Gold) isn't exactly new, it's been announced last November to the studio, and has been effective pretty much since January.
Also fun fact, it was originally PDS Yellow, but I believe it's
@podcat (but might misremember) who went: "No, no, no... GOLD. "