Utopian abundance should allow prioritizing civilian, and treating it as a job for migration

[RingworldUtopia]

I wanna stack tens of thousands of civilians, but it's extremely difficult with the way the game does not differentiate between utopian abundant civilians and other living standard civilians, when it comes to migration. This was inspired by something someone said in a toxic god thread, but i am shattered ring. my highest number of civilians at the moment is 10.5 thousand on the homeworld, with civil education on the first specialization on every world, but i am scared to sign any migration treaties and fear i will lose them all. all in all that has netted me 17k science (across all colonies) and i only JUST removed the interloper and rebuilt my 4th segment into science, with only 400 of each type of science coming from it so far. the year is 2359.

 

[passeris]

What would be the likely consequences of allowing all empires (regardless of living standard) to prioritise civilian, and treating it as a job in this way? I'm not up to speed with the mechanics, but it seems like thematically this is where the economy rework was headed all along.

 

[RingworldUtopia]

What would be the likely consequences of allowing all empires (regardless of living standard) to prioritise civilian, and treating it as a job in this way? I'm not up to speed with the mechanics, but it seems like thematically this is where the economy rework was headed all along.

i don't know but it feels like unless you have civil education and/or utopian abundance, that's kind of not intended. thematically it makes sense that it would be those two that focus on that. one consequence of opening it up to all would be that anyone could do this for their knight habitat.

 

[Wolfgang I]

Whenever I play egalitarian and try migration treaties even newborn civilians seem to get sucked away from my worlds instantly even if there a lot of slots available.

I think there is something really weird going on with migration mechanics.

 

[BrokenSky]

I feel like private (civilian) vs. state economics should be it's own thing, distinct from egalitarianism vs. authoritarianism?



...is it finally time to re-introduce individualist vs. collectivist?

 

[jaketoms16]

i don't know but it feels like unless you have civil education and/or utopian abundance, that's kind of not intended. thematically it makes sense that it would be those two that focus on that. one consequence of opening it up to all would be that anyone could do this for their knight habitat.

Or Hedonists

 

[RingworldUtopia]

Or Hedonists

yes forgot about that one