• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
FAL said:
Nothing for me :D I am almost deaf.

And I can imagine it being a language barrier for some users too. But I guess it would be cool to use in addition to the ingame chat.

Casluerj said:
yeah, especially for us, non-native speakers...

Perfect training :).
 
what is the program, Mulli ?

By the way, there are programs to write the screenvideo, 1 hour takes about 120Mb
 
I would like to have voicechat.
 
Tonioz said:
what is the program, Mulli ?

By the way, there are programs to write the screenvideo, 1 hour takes about 120Mb
There are lots of them. Just search on Google and come up with an example :). I dont know enough to know which is the best.
 
Sure, imagine that instead of needing to send those ducats symbols as a message, to catch my attention when I as usual have lost my focus on the message part of the screen and instead are doing something useful like trading, you can now just shout at me "Daniel, for heaven's sake, decrease the speed you son of a bitch".

If that is not progress I do not know what is. ;)
 
Mulliman said:
Perfect training :).

Besides, think of the diplomatic possibilities.

Now we could have the perfect excuse for breaking words and treaties: 'But I understood you differently' (let say you coordinate a battle plan and both agree to send troops to, let say, Lombardia. But you let your ally be massacred in the plains. If he complain, you say 'but I thought you said...' Perfect :D (and without written record, even better)
 
Teamspeak orVentrilo are the best ones.

For an EU2 multi, Teamspeak would be better since you can setup channel for the whole group, for an alliance, and even for direct one on one private deals.
 
Daniel A said:
Sure, imagine that instead of needing to send those ducats symbols as a message, to catch my attention when I as usual have lost my focus on the message part of the screen and instead are doing something useful like trading, you can now just shout at me "Daniel, for heaven's sake, decrease the speed you son of a bitch". If that is not progress I do not know what is. ;)
Amen. ;)
 
Daniel A said:
Sure, imagine that instead of needing to send those ducats symbols as a message, to catch my attention when I as usual have lost my focus on the message part of the screen and instead are doing something useful like trading, you can now just shout at me "Daniel, for heaven's sake, decrease the speed you son of a bitch".

And then, this is the perfect example why Daniel A actually plays SP in his games: He thinks trading is most useful than read messages sent to him :p
 
RedKetchup said:
For an EU2 multi, Teamspeak would be better since you can setup channel for the whole group, for an alliance, and even for direct one on one private deals.
Hmm, sounds nice.
Should we adopt this for next session of Battlefront IV? :)
 
against, it's supposed the time we spend in writing a messege is relative the same time a messeger needed to send a letter to a receptor. ;)

being serious, I think we'll have a lot of misunderstandings if we accept voice-chatting