Don_Quigleone said:Heck you're never gonna see spelling reform in englishbut let's not forget most of the population couldn't read anyway so it's not really the same, so if you have a state without much of an educated literate elite then it might be possible (and even then you have the case of hangul, though in korea chinese script wasn't suited to korean) however I'm really just playing devils advocate here, I don't think it's very likey either, but having movable type work in a meaningful way is almost equally improbable as don't forget that in the 19th century there was a raison d'etre for a movable type i.e. mass market newspapers which weren't really present before then in europe much less china
The problem, of course, is that China DID have a large class of literate scholars. Many, many more people took and passed the imperial examinations than were able to gain appointment in the Imperial government.
I also don't see not having newspapers as being much of an argument against movable type-- China had many more literate people in it total, and many many more literate people per capita, than Europe at the time. This means greater demand for books, scrolls, proclamations, etc. The "raison d'etre" for movable type in the later Qing dynasty was the desire to catch up to Europe after having fallen so far behind thanks to the repressive Qing government and Ming apathy before it.
Newspapers certainly weren't the raison d'etre for movable type in Europe either, for that matter, so it's something of a non sequitur to suggest that it would need to be.