• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
So, you won't tell if he was attached or not.

Well I'll tell you the truth, I don't know what I'm supposed to say or not say. My briefing regarding GMing was quite short.

I don't know if I was right about this colour thing, if I should've just let you people bicker about it or not. I feel like it's explaining game rules, not intervening in the game itself.

So here's my final say: colours are irrelevant to affiliations.


It seems the wolves are all in. Will you let them get away with it?

What the heck are you talking about?
 
Fair enough. It's your game, after all. Although you shouldn't have posted that bit about the hunter question as that can influence the game (it can't influence the wolves, though, who will get away with voting a hunter and getting the game finished).

Oh, I don't know, I'm talking about flowers and stuff...

We're still missing some votes... come on, don't go afk now
 
Also, since there won't be another chance to use it...

Hunt Snoopdogg

Use your trait for that plox, not your role. There's been 2 hunter goodies already, 3 would seem excessive..hmm..
Here's my theory, Ricebowl. You thought AoK was the last wolf of the other pack, so outing him would make you look like a goody with parity approaching, and help you out anyway. The seer likely wouldn't be alive much longer, and even if he was he likely wouldn't scan you, thinking your gamble made you a goodie. Even if worst came to worst and AoK was a villager, you could use your hunter trait in another attempt to get the last rival and 'clear' yourself. When bandwagoning the dogg didn't seem like it would work, you started a fight with your packmate Ciryandor, so whichever one of you wasn't lynched would still look clear. How am I doing?
 
Use your trait for that plox, not your role. There's been 2 hunter goodies already, 3 would seem excessive..hmm..
Here's my theory, Ricebowl. You thought AoK was the last wolf of the other pack, so outing him would make you look like a goody with parity approaching, and help you out anyway. The seer likely wouldn't be alive much longer, and even if he was he likely wouldn't scan you, thinking your gamble made you a goodie. Even if worst came to worst and AoK was a villager, you could use your hunter trait in another attempt to get the last rival and 'clear' yourself. When bandwagoning the dogg didn't seem like it would work, you started a fight with your packmate Ciryandor, so whichever one of you wasn't lynched would still look clear. How am I doing?

Obnoxiously bad, I'm afraid.

Likely, likely, likely.... :rolleyes:
So, first I am not a hunter, then I am a hunter. First, my gamble makes me a wolf, and now it doesn't... And why would I start a fight with Ciryandor if we were packmates, if the game will most likely be over tomorrow? Behaviorally, it is pretty clear you are his packmate. And I will shoot you, if the village permits it.

Any leader out there, put in an order to redirect the lynch to Ciryandor, please.

PS : EURO, if you aren't a wolf, I will cry.
 
Last edited:
Your argument is that the hunt order happens after the lynch.

My argument is that the orders have to be sent before the deadline. And orders should specify a name, not a trait or role. Therefore here's how I see things:
order shall be sent --> Lynch reveals the identity of the president --> hunt.

Since you cannot know the name of the president before sending the proper order I do not consider that legit and thus will not carry it on.

I don't think I'm being unfair here.


]

To simply make a comment, although I hate to defend Reis here, his order was valid and should have been carried out if it is as you described. GMs have carried out backups, conditional orders, and such since the beginning of Werewolf. The hunt happens after the lynch, and conditional orders based on new information revealed at lynching time should be carried out.

So in your example, a wolf gives an order that says for example "If a leader steps forward and changes the lynch target, that leader, whoever he is, is to be hunted".

That is a valid order and should be carried out.

Just for you future GMs out there. In actuality the wolves decide who to kill AFTER the lynch. The night is a new phase. After the lynching during the day. Thats how it works. Orders are sent before the deadline for convenience purposes to get the update up.
 
Obnoxiously bad, I'm afraid.

Likely, likely, likely.... :rolleyes:.

I'm trying to find rationale behind your actions in this game. If noone but you is able to do it, maybe that says something? You either went full smacktard and suicide bombed your own side, or you're a baddie. If you want someone other than you lynched today, you need to make an actual case against someone. Playing the 'I'm a villager who doesn't understand why blowing up my own team is a bad' card, hopefully still doesn't work in these games.
 
VOTEDRACULA
02 hours remaining



reis91 (4) - Bagricula, Ciryandor, Trinitrotoluen, EUROO,
Snoopdogg (1) - Boris
Ciryandor (1) - reis91

Not voted: Falc, Snoopdogg

Missed one vote: Bagricula
 
Last edited:
That being said, we had no leader intervention, so it's a bit of a moot point for now.

I know that. I was using a leader as an example of a conditional order using a trait instead of a name. The point remains valid.

But the game goes on. I just wanted to make that clear for future GMs.

Besides, its not like Reis did not deserve to get screwed by the GM. The Werewolf Gods are wise.
 
Oh well... Snoop makes a good point, so does Reis.

But I do think the bandwagon on Reis is likely a wolf tactic. At this point in time, they need but one more lynch to go their way to win. If Reis were a wolf, there would be more votes on snoopdogg or Ciryandor.

VOTE snoopdogg