Better make it a TIE, that way we can take out both of them.
Unvote randakar
Vote Rysz
Unvote randakar
Vote Rysz
I couldn't care less if it bothers you or not. I merely despise apathy.
He always tries to get me to look suspicious, so I preemptively strike him. And yes, we could do something better, like a hunt order, I suppose.
Better make it a TIE, that way we can take out both of them.
Unvote randakar
Vote Rysz
Unvote Rysz
Vote randakar
That's 4.
I'm no new Werewolf player. ;D
Vote randakar
Ah well. Right. Let's see what we caught so far:
Interesting. Only new(ish) players following my self vote. Hrm.
The thing is, since I know I am a villager, the people who vote me are much better bets for wolves than people who are voting unknowns.
Lynching the newbies just won't do, however.![]()
I'm sorry, but that reasoning is so flawed it's ridiculous you even brought it up. What you know doesn't impact what others do, since we don't know what you know. Unless you share of course. You decided to vote yourself and proclaimed that you would be lame the whole game, thus others followed and voted you. If we have no clue who the wolves are, we can at least kill of someone who doesn't seem to want to play anyway.
Baiting like you apparently did there has no guarantees whatsoever to work, since as far as we know you might as well be a wolf pulling a j-L.
Hmmm, well noticed randakar, what reis said does seem like a Crovaxian slip. Oh well, no sense to continue the bandwagon:
Unvote Rysz
Vote reis91
Although I have to admit I'm torn between EURO(he annoys me) and reis. Oh well, there's still plenty of time.
I'm sorry, but that reasoning is so flawed it's ridiculous you even brought it up. What you know doesn't impact what others do, since we don't know what you know. Unless you share of course. You decided to vote yourself and proclaimed that you would be lame the whole game, thus others followed and voted you. If we have no clue who the wolves are, we can at least kill of someone who doesn't seem to want to play anyway.
Baiting like you apparently did there has no guarantees whatsoever to work, since as far as we know you might as well be a wolf pulling a j-L.
Hmmm, well noticed randakar, what reis said does seem like a Crovaxian slip. Oh well, no sense to continue the bandwagon
(look reis, I'm not the one making you suspicious, it was your comment that started it this time!)
You must read better. I only said random chances. For the rest, it was semi-humourous. Randakar's post was flawed in more than one way, also because what you say here: wolves are perhaps even more likely to vote other wolves.You've made two incorrect assumptions in your analysis, Rysz:
1.- Wolves will not vote other wolves.Wolves have no reason to not vote for their packmate. In fact, wolves are more likely to vote their packmates to give them cover later in the game should the other be lynched.
2.- Esemesas is a fool.Never put a plan into action based on your opponent's ignorance and/or incompetence. As far as you know, you're dealing with the most talented player this side of Thistletooth.
And yet you're kinda doing it now. One would think that you would be a packmate of mine trying to protect me, if they don't know better. But of course, you're actually counting on people knowing better to bail me out and preserve the pack's mastermind.
(that was a Crovax)
Unvote Randy
Vote Rysz
Rysz is a confirmed waffle.
Before the first night? Good dreams euro![]()
quit rambling, the vote count is fine.jacob, I unvoted randakar and voted reis, see post number 66
(you know what, never mind... I don't feel like having this discussion right now). Let's just say you started the chain of events, and any action by me will be explained by you in a way that leads to "you're making me suspicious".