Thank you enk. I learned alot of things this game.
Among those things, that Kiwi is fucking dangerous and that you are a clueless idiot. Good things to know.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Thank you enk. I learned alot of things this game.
Among those things, that Kiwi is fucking dangerous and that you are a clueless idiot. Good things to know.
To be fair, I gained respect for your ability from this game, rather than lost it. I meant it in my PM when I said your reputation had been damaged by players taking your style but not your substance, and that you had a lot more method behind it. Unfortunately you had a lot of hard luck for one thing, but perhaps more importantly you had in me an enemy who knew you better than you knew them. I was able to use your tendencies to my pack's advantage, while at the same time manipulating the other villager's tendencies to oppose you to my pack's advantage as well. I don't think I'd ever get away with pulling that on you again
At the end of the day though I still disagree with your methods, because I feel my methods are less vulnerable to manipulation or misinterpretation. Or to people not on at deadline. Here tamius was our greatest weapon on the final day, a villager who failed to see what you were doing and wouldn't even need nudging in your direction, and who could also be pushed in other directions - like snoopdogg.
Ain't that the point of the game? To play as solidly as possible? Would you say football is an unbalanced game because some teams are far superior than others?
You just gave me one more argument. If you play good you win. Period. If you play badly as a villager you lose, if you play badly as a wolf you lose, that is the essence of this game.
This game was all balanced, you came close to hitting a wolf pretty early in the game. You had me figured in the end, and villagers failed to defend themselves properly. Xeno didn't try, Enkhuush didn't try. We played one wolf short the entire game and I reckon Syd wasn't that hard to figure out.
All this game tells us is play the damn game till the end. You managed to get Tamius back despite all the major fuck-ups you did. You figured our strategy of letting Tamius live and use him to win, you just didn't get the right target. But let's assume the other villagers had actually played the game, you all vote me last night, you bag yourselves a wolf and a chance to win the game.
Putting back a seer will just bring back the old "let's sit down and wait for the JL to do the job. The seer got killed? Ok, we give up". A game without certitudes is a great game because it's a psychological warfare game. This game could've swung both ways at many critical points. The wolves just played smarter and I think you shouldn't be punished for playing smart.
