Yeah everyone makes mistakes. You're not the only one, I think every GM but Vainglory has hunted the wrong person in the games that I've been a wolf.
It would've helped, but I'm not blaming you for the loss.
That I reserve for suirantes.
And again I was right about King![]()
Bold-size7-color-red your hunt orders. I'm not excusing the GM's ghastly mistake, but it's much more difficult for him to miss it if he's bombarded with imagery.
Hm? Over already? I've been too busy playing HoI today to pay much attention
I suspected one of Kingepyon and Vainglory was a wolf. Vainglory was my pick if one was, until Kingepyon shot down the tie. I should have gone him once reis put it down to Kingepyon and Miotas, but by that stage I wasn't really paying attention, and I got too hooked up on the strange hunts. I should have known from Baldur's Gate that odd hunts aren't always the fault of the wolves.
Bold-size7-color-red your hunt orders. I'm not excusing the GM's ghastly mistake, but it's much more difficult for him to miss it if he's bombarded with imagery.
That's not the point. I KNEW tamius was the hunt target, I wrote up the ENTIRE UPDATE on that fact.
What -is- your point, then?
Good job reis.
@The GM: Yeah, I noticed your post after the update saying you had the RP for the wrong player. It was about all you could do to cover up once once you'd revealed marty's role instead of tamius.
Yeah everyone makes mistakes. You're not the only one, I think every GM but Vainglory has hunted the wrong person in the games that I've been a wolf.
It would've helped, but I'm not blaming you for the loss.
That I reserve for suirantes.
Don't be too harsh on the rookie. To be honest, outing your own packmate is a situationally valid tactic when you suspect you have been compromised. He was unlucky that I had already used the trick myself before, and thus had Yakman scanned. I would be a bit more critic of how he handled the voting and his behavior, but that's something we learn with experience. If I want, I can go look for your earlier games and spot out noob mistakes.
Now, these rules do not work as they currently are. Yakman pointed it out, and I subscribe, that rules must not be ambiguous. I fought back the temptation to find loopholes in the rules and play this game normally, as if there was no Seer and my behavior analysis was on steroids. I even considered refusing to send in scan orders, but thought that it might be unfair for the other villagers. In the end, I had to clarify in not-so subtle terms that I was the Seer, because Vainglory didn't understand. So, you either ban Seer PM (and, for coherence, all villager's) communication, and allow it unrestricted in the topic, or you leave it alone. I favor the second choice.
Everyone winning with their side is not acceptable. Villagers can game it pretty hard by deciding to use sacrifice gambits to take down the wolves, which makes for poor games. You saw that I was ready to sacrifice myself to force King into that tie. Granted, I would do the same in a normal game in a similar situation, but King would have some legitimacy to refuse, and here he just couldn't (although I give him A for the effort in trying to wriggle out of it).
Hm? Over already? I've been too busy playing HoI today to pay much attention![]()
You play MP, or have fun just abusing the AI?
Don't be too harsh on the rookie. To be honest, outing your own packmate is a situationally valid tactic when you suspect you have been compromised. He was unlucky that I had already used the trick myself before, and thus had Yakman scanned. I would be a bit more critic of how he handled the voting and his behavior, but that's something we learn with experience. If I want, I can go look for your earlier games and spot out noob mistakes.
Now, these rules do not work as they currently are. Yakman pointed it out, and I subscribe, that rules must not be ambiguous. I fought back the temptation to find loopholes in the rules and play this game normally, as if there was no Seer and my behavior analysis was on steroids. I even considered refusing to send in scan orders, but thought that it might be unfair for the other villagers. In the end, I had to clarify in not-so subtle terms that I was the Seer, because Vainglory didn't understand. So, you either ban Seer PM (and, for coherence, all villager's) communication, and allow it unrestricted in the topic, or you leave it alone. I favor the second choice.
Everyone winning with their side is not acceptable. Villagers can game it pretty hard by deciding to use sacrifice gambits to take down the wolves, which makes for poor games. You saw that I was ready to sacrifice myself to force King into that tie. Granted, I would do the same in a normal game in a similar situation, but King would have some legitimacy to refuse, and here he just couldn't (although I give him A for the effort in trying to wriggle out of it).
I don't know about the AI, but that game does abuse my mind.
Lastly, let me explain why I criticized wolf's play, especially with regards to hunts.
You say your strategy was to go for the obvious wolves, which would get scanned. Poor choice, because you're removing lynch targets and increasing the odds that one of you is lynched. Remember, the Seer cannot, without violating the spirit of the rules, build a JL by PM's, so he's going to have it harder than usual to out wolves. What you should do, instead, is hunt the most cleared persons, like Kiwi, myself (after lynching Yak), Vainglory, etc, and let the village lynch more suspicious guys like Seen, etc. Furthermore, with these rules, you didn't even know you were wasting seer scans, or if the seer was already dead.