It was either you or one of your family - Rysz(?) who took me to task because I made too many long posts or some utter crap.
It wasn't me. (tm).
One of the times you said it maybe, but pretty often you do and it's a crock.
I don't think I've used that argument in more than in one single game against you. To be fair in that game I did use it more than once, but that's also because at some point I knew you were a wolf and didn't want to go right out and call it for what it was ;-)
If there's nothing new to say what the **** am I meant to do? Say nothing or what? Surely agreeing with something is not a lynchable offence?
Agreeing with somebody isn't a lynchable offense, using that agreement to put bandwagon votes on villagers however is
Or agreeing with somebody *constantly*. It's like every other way to analyse behaviour - how, when, and why matters.
Point is, there is (as far as I know) no correlation between what I post and my role. I can be a quiet villager, or a mouthy wolf - it depends on the game.
I know that. You're barking up the wrong tree here. Really.
I've used that argument against Thistle a few games back though - but that's mostly because somebody (well, the_hdk) at the OT meet mentioned thistle as a prime example of somebody who posts walls of text when he's a wolf. And when I pointed that out he really was a wolf.
If anything my failure in that case was to act on it accordingly..
WW obviously is a game where you trust nobody, that's a given, but there are some players (and this is not aimed at anyone in particular) who default to suspecting the "better" players while ignoring more obvious wolves. TT, EURO, AOK and me being the prime ones who get hanged for pretty lame reasons. For me, OK I've now got 50(?) wins, but that is over 4 years almost to the week, as an average that ain't great.
Maybe it's just me but it appears to me that the people you name are not likely to be the first to hang. The first people to get lynched are usually the quiet or the 'lesser' players. Yakman, Walrus, LS, OY .. you know who they are.
What is important here is to keep in mind that someone being a good player is not necessarily a reason to suspect them
per se. However, it
is a reason to krank up the paranoia level a bit with regards to them. Simply because a good player wolf can do a fair bit more damage than a bad player might. However, on the other hand, if they are villagers .. not listening to them can harm you.
So what I'm saying is that looking at what these people say and do is not such a strange thing. Ascertaining that they are on your side (or not) may be the most important thing you can do. Unfortunately a side effect of the paranoia that comes with this is that wolves can use it against you..
Anyway: New game?
Should I?
