The third voter who is already the subject of a bandwagon eh?
huh?
Look, I always do that vote
no matter what. It doesn't matter who the third voter happens to be. If it's my packmate I'm *still* putting my vote there. Hell, if it's the seer and he scanned me? Still bloody well voting him.
It means absolutely nothing.
You *always* get me killed, and I am bored with it.
And that is patently untrue. You know it is. I had a hunt streak on you once, sure. But we're even on that. Apart from that - seriously, when is the last time I got you killed for no good reason?
So I get bandwagonned twice in 2 days for totally stupid reasons. We effing hay.
I didn't vote you in the big game, nor did I say anything about you in that game at all. I didn't even think you suspicious..
Randakar and the hdk, you ought to know better. I got wagonned in full for being the third voter, wasn't a wolf, and what do you do? Oh look, you do it again. What is it they call repeating the same action and expecting a different result? Oh yes, the definition of stupidity.
If you want to bandwagon me, at least have the spine to bloody well say so.
I really wonder why you're so angry here. It's what, 20 hours until the deadline? Relax ..
So you can't be arsed basically?
Not even to read the thread to see you're creating a bandwagon.
My family wanted me to come downstairs and watch a movie. That kind of took priority.
marty99 said:
In what way does someone not wanting to receive an extra vote give any indication of their role?
Information is information. It's a clue, nothing more. Not much of one maybe, but *shrug*.
Besides, that's not the real reason why I do it like that anyway?
jonti-h said:
When it has been shown in virtually every game to be a totally **** theory though, he can change it. As I said, repeating the same action...
Any means of randomly voting someone is ****, really. Random votes aren't effective to find wolves, analysis is.
The main thing about it is *I don't have a choice*. The game rolls the dice for me. Nobody can say "that vote wasn't random", because it's not up to me to decide who the dice lands on.
jonti-h said:
It's just a coincidence that Randakar always kills me.
I'd be very careful with that argument if I were you. It's not true and an appeal to my emotions. It has worked in the past to get me to unvote you - something which I was planning to do _anyway_ - but your blatant attempt at manipulating me in this matter makes me reconsider.
marty99 said:
Another thing that strikes me as odd is that, despite the fact jonti is out in front by two votes and at least a few people have found this an undesirable state of affairs, no one has yet made a move to bring someone closer to jonti-h. This fits with one of the people with two votes being a wolf and would partially explain why people are so reluctant to bring them nearer the lead. Regardless of whether that's true we should keep it close, since there's only one person yet to vote (Eternaly_Lost?), it seems this may stay like this so I'll change:
Well, consider yourselves lucky jonti .. that actually is a good argument.
Unvote jonti-h
Vote walrus
marty99 said:
It's might not always be, but today it surely is.
It's a bloodie lie, that's what it is. Historically I've always *avoided* voting him. Except when I have good reasons for it. And like I've said before, we have a ton of time until the deadline.
marty99 said:
For the moment I would say useless, although Randakar could be a bit useful later on, once he's not shackled by his ''system''.
It's not as big a set of shackles as you think. I change my vote away from the initial one often enough. Heck, I've once did the vote switch in the same post that I put the initial one down.
Usually I let it sit for a bit though.
edit: Also - tie!