Ha! It's warm here in the land of the dead![]()
Does that mean you're in hell?!
Ha! It's warm here in the land of the dead![]()
Does that mean you're in hell?!
Olaus:
I certainly considered Euro07, but as you mention when Euro told Walrus he was the seer and Mr G was the wolf, the seer could have only scanned one person. So either the he scanned Walrus and cleared him, or, he scanned Mr G and found him to be a wolf. So we'd have to believe that Walrus was stupid or inexperienced enough not to have realised this. And that Euro was stupid or inexperienced enough not to have seen what a weak ploy this was to save his packmate. Furthermore we'd have to believe that Euro was also too stupid or inexperienced enough not to kill Walrus that night to shut him up and somehow Walrus didnt think his story was worth telling us the next day until his head got on the chopping block. Now Im not aware of the experience levels of either player, and I would welcome testimony from others as to their capabilities, but even if they were both inexperienced noobies (which I doubt Euro is since Im pretty sure hes been involved in atleast a few of these), I think at the very least Walrus would've coming running to with that story the next morning instead of waiting for his head to get to the chopping block.
Having said all that I find it extremely difficult to believe that even if he were a noobie, walrus wouldnt have told us his story. You yourself found these same weaknesses in walrus' story when he first made his claims yesterday.
I think a more reasonable explanation is that Walrus found a bandwagon forming against him and decided that the only way to save himself was to make up stuff about another person who didnt vote lemeard and chose Euro as he started the bandwagon against Mr G.
If you have any other suggestions/ideas please bring them up.
Heh... "Euro07"...
:rofl:
How about this: You both focus on analyzing another character and take a brake from analyzing yourselves for a bit. We learn nothing if you two continue to go at it. Focus on a third party.