panther-anthro: I'm not even remotely close to writing the full story. This is a general outline at best, for likely the best outcomes of the variable Lollard Wessexes.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
well they aren't even likely to turn Lollard. lots of games, they don't. In my last 1.05 games they haven't.
panther-anthro said:
I have seen the Lollards emerge.
We also have to remember that someone might play Wessex and want to chose to become Reformed (Lollardy).
Plus, if someone writes a great storyline for it, we can change thinsg so that Lollardy has a greater chance of sticking.
MattyG said:
It only counts if there are events Matty. Things have a tendancy not to get done around here without those. So, more event writing, and less storyline writing. Get a basic premise, and come up with ideas as you go along, or base them around the monarch file *which needs to be replaced, there are two henry II leaders at 1419 date, in york and wessex!
panther-anthro said:
Honestly, I think you contradict yourself here.
The story MUST come first even if, as you say in the second sentence, it begins brief. But every writer must be given their own space. You prefer the light approach, get an outline and begin writing. Time Consumer appears to have an approach where the full stroy needs to be done before an event can be written. Each to their own.
Henry was a popular name in this period. There are a lot of monarchs of German states called Friedrich or Sigmund.
panther-anthro said:
I know, it's a freak of nature, isn't it!
The monarchs lists were done by different people.
Covalent evolution at work?
MattyG said:
That's more then just scary Matty. It should be fixed anyway, they shouldn't have the exact same names, and stats. They might as well be the same guy running between two countries, 'duke of wessex and york'. Conspiracy!
panther-anthro said:
When I noticed this I had just force vassalised York as Wessex so thought they had an event fire which had changed their king.
Truth is stranger than fiction.
On in fictions does everyone have a different name.
Interregnum is truth.
On in fictions does everyone have a different name.
Interregnum is truth.
Depends on the reason for the edit.
Is there a bug?
Is it an impossibility?
Back in 1066 England had three contenders for the throne, two of them were named Harold.
Either one would have been Harold I, and that's for the same monarch line, not even a different one.
Is there a bug?
Is it an impossibility?
Back in 1066 England had three contenders for the throne, two of them were named Harold.
Either one would have been Harold I, and that's for the same monarch line, not even a different one.
Stats should likely be changed so as not to confuse players into thinking that they were both ruled by the same monarch.
HAH, garbon gets my point. -victory-At least a singular variation in some stat, would make them different..
OK, for all those people who are easily confused .....
I will change the name AND the stats.
I will change the name AND the stats.