Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

When's DLC coming out?

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Show only dev responses
such a shame, still feels like an incomplete and unballanced game, but so much protentional.

trying to figuer out how our 4 way lanparty will look like, i cant find a ballance in deviding the nations with 4 people :(
 
It's a gem oft a game, much like the original Crusader Kings. It's funny to remember, that they really had to think hard about CK2 before they went and made it. CK1 had some interesting mechanics but didn't sell too well, it was the odd man out. Well, they decided to risk it and the rest is history. MotE is the new CK1. There is so much potential there, it just has to be flashed out some more. I hope some day they will revisit it, concetrate fully on the SP Part and bring it home. Fingers crossed.
 
kosmoface said:
It's a gem oft a game, much like the original Crusader Kings. It's funny to remember, that they really had to think hard about CK2 before they went and made it. CK1 had some interesting mechanics but didn't sell too well, it was the odd man out. Well, they decided to risk it and the rest is history. MotE is the new CK1. There is so much potential there, it just has to be flashed out some more. I hope some day they will revisit it, concetrate fully on the SP Part and bring it home. Fingers crossed.
Click to expand...
That would make sense, except that the comparison is not very accurate. CK1 was first of its kind, while March of the Eagles is the successor to the AGEOD game Napoleans' campaigns. CK1 was supported extensively, while this game seems pretty much untouched, with the release of CK2 and EUIV to occupy dev interest. If anything, M of the E is best compared to sengoku: a project that was put out and then pretty much forgotten when there were bigger fish to fry. Sorry.
 
Pete0714 said:
That would make sense, except that the comparison is not very accurate. CK1 was first of its kind, while March of the Eagles is the successor to the AGEOD game Napoleans' campaigns. CK1 was supported extensively, while this game seems pretty much untouched, with the release of CK2 and EUIV to occupy dev interest. If anything, M of the E is best compared to sengoku: a project that was put out and then pretty much forgotten when there were bigger fish to fry. Sorry.
Click to expand...

He puts it best.
 
Seeing how this forum is as dead as Sengoku's, I fear it will follows the same fate as Sengoku as far as DLC are concerned :(
 
Pete0714 said:
That would make sense, except that the comparison is not very accurate. CK1 was first of its kind, while March of the Eagles is the successor to the AGEOD game Napoleans' campaigns. CK1 was supported extensively, while this game seems pretty much untouched, with the release of CK2 and EUIV to occupy dev interest. If anything, M of the E is best compared to sengoku: a project that was put out and then pretty much forgotten when there were bigger fish to fry. Sorry.
Click to expand...

You don't understand... Sengoku was just a test drive before CKII was released, but I'm talking about game mechanics... in MotE you have some brilliant ideas which you don't find in other Paradox Games... just like CKI they aren't fully realized until now. Paradox went the wrong way focussing on the MP part and then they cut the support, just like EU: Rome. Sengoku on the other hand is nothing new and they did the same game much better already...it's just a different setting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back