-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I think given the number of nations involved, 2.4 average is still significantly low.
Obviously fixing this would take a few hours, so is more than any Paradox dev is likely to want to do. But in an ideal world, I think nations should be given a pass so that all "who really knows" leaders were given stats totaling 9 (maybe with a slight bias toward whatever stat the nation would be most expected to lean to).
Really, once you knock out the "we have strong opinions about their competence" rulers, the average ought to fall somewhere between 2.9 and 3.1.
- 3
- 1
"These leaders don't have stats higher than they do because we don't want them to have the benefits they'd get from their stats being higher than they currently are."
How does that not hold up to logical scrutiny?
The notion that raising an OPM's starting monarch from 2/2/2 to 3/3/3 would materially affect their circumstances in the hands of the AI is obviously false.
- 3
Because the reason for not wanting to give them said benefits is allegedly "balance".
Again, I never said that leader stats determine outcome, just that higher leader stats are objectively better than lower ones.
What?
- 2