Will tribal rulers with "Tribes of the North" have their own way to feudalize?

[DiabloDeVille]

For starters, removing the innovation hard cap. Because it's not just tech, it's cultural slots too. And more building upgrades.

But how does that make tribal more viable as tribal, instead of feudal but prestige for MaA and concubines?

 

[Delterius]

But how does that make tribal more viable as tribal, instead of feudal but prestige for MaA and concubines?

I think that as long as tribal is partially defined as having its buildings situation frozen in the tribal era, it will always feel like a temporary government. Something to reform out of as soon as possible, or to keep only as a matter of vanity. It isn't a coincidence that the Tribes of the North tradition hints at offering a way to circumvent that.

 

[Pigposting]

But how does that make tribal more viable as tribal, instead of feudal but prestige for MaA and concubines?

I don't think the definition of feudal is just having upgrade-able buildings, Administrative, Nomad and Adventurers have more than 2 tiers of building upgrades. Tribes of the North is already experimenting on what tribe could be - and having cheap upgrades, more able to form federations and high terrain advantages creates a vibe of a smaller dispersed societies that can stand as one in times of need.

I can see the vision. It just needs a little more polish and exploration.

They better do it too or else South East Asia won't be presented right.