Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

World in Flames II [1.05.1 compatible]

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Don't post things like that.
 
what does it take for the even bitter peace to fire i already and shuld i be worry if it fires too soon after invading SOV cuz i decided to star babarosa in 1944 aftear sea lion
 
Cybvep said:
If the system is exploitable and it can be fixed, then it should be fixed. "Just don't do it" argument doesn't convince me here - this is a bad approach to game balancing that only increases the need for more and more house rules. However, if it cannot be fixed, then I guess that we will simply have to live with it.
Click to expand...
Oh, you know, do not misunderstand me, but I totally agree with your statement. And I can only assume that Ticket Cookie would be ok with that too. But when one has to classify bugs to fix them by order of importance, it is certainly helpful to name a cat a cat, a breaking bug a breaking bug and a good-to-have a good-to-have. And not a good-to-have a BREAKING BUG (that fools don't fix). Please note the caps and the attack. THIS called for a call to some moderation, not the fact if the bug should be fixed or not.
Cheers!
 
DivineShadow said:
WIF Bug:

You can build say 10 Offensive chits and press *Launch offensive chit* 10 times and your units have 250 org, and infantry runs faster than tanks and you get +300 combat modifier and you kill everything in 1 hit...

You need a flag that gets set when offensive is launched and dont allow another launch until the flag ends.
Click to expand...

Thanks for mentioning this, I will include it when (if) I release a new version
 
Cybvep said:
If the system is exploitable and it can be fixed, then it should be fixed. "Just don't do it" argument doesn't convince me here - this is a bad approach to game balancing that only increases the need for more and more house rules. However, if it cannot be fixed, then I guess that we will simply have to live with it.
Click to expand...

Oh you're right and that's nice to Divine Shadow to post a fix, it's only the way he do it, like Lucifer said; for me he overreacted (calling fool a modder) for something wich is not of utmost importance (at least not "game breaking").
But it's over, let's go back to the topic :)
 
One bug; Force dutch surrender does not work properly after reducing the infra in Rotterdam below 90%

A minor issue, reformation of the Luftwaffe mentiones that Goring needs to be in the cabinet, but he needs to be Chief of the Airforce.
 
so as the new patch has been released, when can we expect an updated version of this great mod?

eeeex
 
Ticket Cookie said:
I second the statement above. And, you know Divine Shadow, there is no need to be so aggressive. FT is doing this mod on his free time, you didn't pay for WiF2 so you can't really ask for a perfect codding. I also believe that if peoples want to, they will always cheat. So why not playing with peoples not doing exploit? Or tell them that's stupid? And not be so rude with modders. Just my two cents.
Click to expand...

I dont play WIF either i just had to observe games where it WAS played and i take it as important to stamp out cheating.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back