He died on Day 2, and Racz isn't counting the prize day as a day, so Xeno had two nights to scan.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Vote Arch_mede
placeholder vote. No real reason to vote him.
I don't see much evidence between Rysz or Cymsdale.
I will break a tie if necessary, I just don't see any pattern yet.
placeholder vote. No real reason to vote him.
I don't see much evidence between Rysz or Cymsdale.
I will break a tie if necessary, I just don't see any pattern yet.
Nor do I... I only made one typing error, which is quite explainable (and for those who actually know me, I make mix-ups between similarly sounding words like this often enough).
I haven't seen much evidence against me otherwise.
@GM: Have you tried Steed? He was in the thread and complained he missed the sign-up.
If you can't find enough subs I think you will have to start autolynching people that missed 3 votes. It is not fair for us actually playing if a sub joins in after a week and there is no voting record to go by for them that can help us analyze their previous records.
Something completely unrelated. Would you mind terribly to use a specific "GM color" for your posts in the thread. They sort of disappear in the general "spamming" when you only bold them in white.
The vote is oky 6, walrus 6, randaker 5 & jerard 5
I think this is a bit iffy. If AVN really think a tie is a bad thing, then wouldn't the reaction to realising that he created a tie either to undo what he said or advocate that his choice of tie breaker was superior to Randakar? He did neither. He maintained his vote, which might eventually have saved randakar the confirmed wolf. He managed to post a "ties are ev0l" post + vote in less than minute, but 3 minutes was not enough to break the tie he created, and said was wrong? In fact there wasn't enough minutes since he never voted again that day.
I also think his outing of an "analysed sorceror" is a bit iffy. Pinging a (likely) solo player with analysis? Impressive. Doing that and not pinging a wof dispite several days of analysis and 2 dead wolfs. Suspicious. The only thing that would explain that if AVN was in contact with Marty. But luckily thats provable
Until then or until anyone brings up anything better
Vote AVN
No it is not! Vote Randakar!
AVN never changes his vote since.
I think this is a bit iffy. If AVN really think a tie is a bad thing, then wouldn't the reaction to realising that he created a tie either to undo what he said or advocate that his choice of tie breaker was superior to Randakar? He did neither. He maintained his vote, which might eventually have saved randakar the confirmed wolf. He managed to post a "ties are ev0l" post + vote in less than minute, but 3 minutes was not enough to break the tie he created, and said was wrong? In fact there wasn't enough minutes since he never voted again that day.
I also think his outing of an "analysed sorceror" is a bit iffy. Pinging a (likely) solo player with analysis? Impressive. Doing that and not pinging a wof dispite several days of analysis and 2 dead wolfs. Suspicious. The only thing that would explain that if AVN was in contact with Marty. But luckily thats provable
Until then or until anyone brings up anything better
Vote AVN
AVN is dead...
And he turned out to be a villager so I don't understand how he could know a sorcerer.
And he turned out to be a villager so I don't understand how he could know a sorcerer.
A player who the GM has said will be subbed out should behave as a ghost until the GM says otherwise.
Ciryandor's post
i) should not have been made as he should have been acting under ghost rules
ii) gives away what his role is, and therefore his role needs to be autolynched not subbed, and Ciryandor booted from the game.
Ciryandor's post
i) should not have been made as he should have been acting under ghost rules
ii) gives away what his role is, and therefore his role needs to be autolynched not subbed, and Ciryandor booted from the game.
I'm glad I'm not the only idiot who votes dead players or GM's...
Welcome to the club.
There are plenty of patterns out there. Here is one you should consider.
Trespoe has shown in previous games that he is good at spotting patterns. Trespoe is avoiding posting about the patterns he has spotted in this game. Perhaps it is because he is a wolf!
unvote Cymsdale
vote Trespoe
Vote jonti-h
If someone votes a dead person I am willing to let that slide, but if someone else votes the same dead person on the same page after it has been well established that he is dead there is only one proper course of action.
If someone votes a dead person I am willing to let that slide, but if someone else votes the same dead person on the same page after it has been well established that he is dead there is only one proper course of action.
There is now a massive list of suspects.
First, the should have been ghost who gave away what his role was and posted analysis and vote in an attempt to influence the game.
Asking to sub back in as someone else while the ghost's role is still live, gives away that the role is a villager.
I hope the GM acts promptly and kills the role, but if the GM doesn't, the players must.
Second, the unlucky slipper up, Rysz.
Third and fourth, the serial bandwagonners, Jamie and Cymsdale.
Fifth, the carefully non-analysing Trespoe.
Sixth and seventh, WD and Jonti, likely packmates in the pack that didn't kill AVN. That one player should vote for a dead villager might be accidental. That another should support after the error has been pointed out looks like enemy action.
First, the should have been ghost who gave away what his role was and posted analysis and vote in an attempt to influence the game.
gm said:
ghostciryandor said:
Asking to sub back in as someone else while the ghost's role is still live, gives away that the role is a villager.
I hope the GM acts promptly and kills the role, but if the GM doesn't, the players must.
Second, the unlucky slipper up, Rysz.
Third and fourth, the serial bandwagonners, Jamie and Cymsdale.
Fifth, the carefully non-analysing Trespoe.
Sixth and seventh, WD and Jonti, likely packmates in the pack that didn't kill AVN. That one player should vote for a dead villager might be accidental. That another should support after the error has been pointed out looks like enemy action.
Personally, I don't see a problem there, thought we can discuss this in detail after the game ends.