WW XCIX: The Seer Academy

[Ayeshteni]

Long time no see!

I'm not sure, do we still have some scores to settle or are we even? I think we tried (and managed!) to get each other killed a few times back in the days.

I'm sure we are even. :nods: Yup, we are.

Aye.

 

[reis91]

Ok, we can expect a hunt on either one of you, in that case

 

[EUROO7]

Ok, we can expect a hunt on either one of you, in that case

I'll lynch you if either of them are hunted.

Did you get that, wolves?!

 

[reis91]

I'll try and fail miserably to lynch you

Fixed

 

[EUROO7]

Fixed

haha oh wow

 

[Lord_D]

In,

some questions about the egomaniac. If player A wrongfully accuses player B, will player A die from the moment of the accusation (and thus render all his votes and actions done after the accusation void), will he die before the lynching (will his vote count?), he dies after lynching but before night or does he die after the night.

He'd die at lynchtime, so his vote still counts but he'll be dead before the night falls.

Mr. GM, can me and Aye be in the same pack?

We'll see about that^^

 

[randakar]

He'd die at lynchtime, so his vote still counts but he'll be dead before the night falls.

If someone dies in that manner, does his or her brutal trait fire?
(Assuming that trait is even in the game - I'm too lazy to check )

 

[Lord_D]

If someone dies in that manner, does his or her brutal trait fire?
(Assuming that trait is even in the game - I'm too lazy to check )

It won't, brutal is only for people that get lynched. Keep on asking questions people (it's very helpful ), lest there's any obvious fail-scenario with my rules I haven't considered

 

[randakar]

It won't, brutal is only for people that get lynched. Keep on asking questions people (it's very helpful ), lest there's any obvious fail-scenario with my rules I haven't considered

There is the little fact that Cultists aren't scannable except by sorcerers or with once-per-game abilities, but I presume that is intentional.

 

[Lord_D]

There is the little fact that Cultists aren't scannable except by sorcerers or with once-per-game abilities, but I presume that is intentional.

It is

 

[Slinky]

He'd die at lynchtime, so his vote still counts but he'll be dead before the night falls.

So if an outed wolf wanted to get rid of all the egomaniacs, he could just accuse everyone. I think you should limit the accusations to one per person per day.

 

[randakar]

So if an outed wolf wanted to get rid of all the egomaniacs, he could just accuse everyone. I think you should limit the accusations to one per person per day.

Not if the chances for the neutrals to die goes down with the number of accusations .. if I was GM'ing I'd just flatly state it will fail to work if there is reason to believe someone is gaming the rules like that

 

[Lord_D]

Not if the chances for the neutrals to die goes down with the number of accusations .. if I was GM'ing I'd just flatly state it will fail to work if there is reason to believe someone is gaming the rules like that

Rest assured that if I see someone abusing the rules he'll feel my terror striking down on him

 

[Eternaly_Lost]

Lovers know who their lover is right? Do they also know the roles of their Lover as well? You can't have two wolfs from different packs as lovers right?

The last would just mean that both can not win the game at all, so I would suggest that it is avoided at all cost.

 

[Lord_D]

Lovers know who their lover is right? Do they also know the roles of their Lover as well? You can't have two wolfs from different packs as lovers right?

The last would just mean that both can not win the game at all, so I would suggest that it is avoided at all cost.

Lover is a role, and they do know eachother.

 

[jonti-h]

Lover is a role, and they do know eachother.

Biblically.

 

[Polar Mongoose]

Vote Jonti-h

 

[jonti-h]

Vote Jonti-h

Brutalise Polar Bitething.

Now trot along and update your AAR. NAO!!

 

[Lemeard]

Vote Jonti-h

+1

 

[jonti-h]

+1

no u!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!