• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Um, did I say there was anything wrong with it:confused:
But it did influence the voting, your vote on Nautilu was probably the key factor in AOK saying ''we need to lynch Nautilu now'', had you voted for yakman, the-hdk or jester things could have turned out differently, I'm not saying it was wolfish, but it did have a sizeable effect on the voting

OK, I didn't read your post properly; that is a very fair statement.

@Cymsdale: No.
 
According to Cymsdale Theorem: Xarkan, sbr and Yakman are 66-100% wolf and should be 3-way tied. :D
One thing about it in general Cymsdale, sometimes I defend villagers as a villager because I genuinely believe them to be a villager

However, one thing is certain, Xarkan needs to be checked out
Vote Xarkan
 
seriously you people are truly morons.

I'll explain after the game. this village is up for a big loss.
and aok you will be hunted 3 times by me. note that if you want.

Oh NO! What will the village do without....HDK!!?@##% :rolleyes:

We will be just fine thank you. Hunt me if you will. Or you can go die in a gutter. Oh wait, you're already dead. Sorry.

In other news, marty is right that we have some information to work with. I will look it over tonight if I have time.
 
vote aok.11
 
One thing about it in general Cymsdale, sometimes I defend villagers as a villager because I genuinely believe them to be a villager

However, one thing is certain, Xarkan needs to be checked out
Vote Xarkan

Don't confuse the Xeno Theorem with the Cymsdale Theorem, they are completely different!
 

it seems you do not believe me.

WWL CLIX: Werewolf Evolution

I have read the game you cite. The wolves imploded and you had scans to work with. Big deal. Give me a game where the Seer was gone, you had no scan results to work with, and you wiped out a pack anyway and perhaps I would consider your criticism.

Now back to the game. Why exactly are you voting for me again?
 
Do you guys even care to explain? Anything?
you are the one who started the counter bandwagon on an innocent villager. you initiated it, you were the main cheerleader, and quite frankly, i don't trust you.
 
you are the one who started the counter bandwagon on an innocent villager. you initiated it, you were the main cheerleader, and quite frankly, i don't trust you.

Yes. I did indeed. I will likely initiate another bandwagon tomorrow. I have probably initiated more bandwagons than anybody else in werewolf history. That is certainly not out of the norm for me. It is how I work. In fact, I start more bandwagons as a villager to force votes than as a wolf. If you want to look at older games to confirm this then go ahead.

I do not ask you to trust me. I ask you to consider the odds of me escaping a scan from the Seer. I also ask you to look at my record. I am an effective villager, who is almost certainly going to be scanned. Not a good lynch target at this point.
 
Yes. I did indeed. I will likely initiate another bandwagon tomorrow. I have probably initiated more bandwagons than anybody else in werewolf history. That is certainly not out of the norm for me. It is how I work. In fact, I start more bandwagons as a villager to force votes than as a wolf. If you want to look at older games to confirm this then go ahead.

I do not ask you to trust me. I ask you to consider the odds of me escaping a scan from the Seer. I also ask you to look at my record. I am an effective villager, who is almost certainly going to be scanned. Not a good lynch target at this point.
and if the seer has scanned only wolves and villagers who have died? it's happened before.

the seer is silent. you got a villager killed.