I can see several flaws in your reasoning here EL...
Well lets see here.
AOK claims that Velasco is the wolf.
No, he doesn't, he's already acknowledged that he was just doing it to try and get a wolf to jump on the bandwagon, probably as he thought the wolf would believe him to be the sorc
Euro claims that there is no way that AOK could know that.
That would cause me to think that AOK is the sorc, and that Euro is the seer.
It was fairly obvious to see what AOK.11 was trying just from the thread, I don't see how EURO has to be the seer to know that, you just have to have played a few Lite games with him
As for AOK being the sorc, he's already admitted he lied, I don't think a sorc would do that (nor, for that matter, would AOK, as the sorc, try to win in such a typical fashion) if he decided to fake-out somebody as the sorc he would most probably have to stick with it, unless he's playing some extremely convoluted double-bluff
That would leave me to conclude that Marty99, must be the wolf.
...
Okay, assuming that the above statements about EURO and AOK.11 are true (which they are almost certainly not, and your evidence for it is false anyway) this would hold water, if AOK is the sorc and EURO the seer, and you know yourself that you're a goodie, then it does follow that I'm a wolf
However as I've already said that scenario completely collapses under everything we've seen so far
However, Then AOK said he was faking it, and by taking that into account, I think he most likely human, and that would cause the rather interesting case of either Velasco or Marty99 being the wolf, and the other the Sorc.
I can see your point that if AOK was faking it, he'd most likely be a goodie. Not that I agree with it, AOK is a master at doing something ridiculous then saying ''look, would a baddie do something so obviously suspicious like that?'' and using it to clear himself, then he turns out to be the wolf in the end, we can't rule out a double-bluff on his part.
One thing I can't get is why EURO can't be the wolf here.
Your only reasoning for him being the seer is that he called AOK on his bluff, as I've said before, it is fairly obvious to anyone who knows AOK that he would not out someone in that fashion. He could still be the seer, but nothing is set in stone here. Although his own posts do indicate he is the seer, but this is EURO.
Given all that, I am going to throw my vote on vote Marty99 , for now, until one of them comes in and says something.
Well now I've said something, and I'm going to place my vote on he who has said least so far:
AOK 11 is evidently a baddie and he is bluffing, first of all because I am a goodie and secondly because he would supposedly have no way of knowing. He is either sorceror or wolf, no way of knowing, but at very least we get to eliminate one half of the bad couple. Get rid of him and we will be left with only wolf (or sorceror) and all 3 goodies. Seer can then reveal himself and we lynch remaining baddie.
Vote AOK 11
__________________
This is the polar oppposite of EL's view, he thinks AOK must be a baddie because he lied, I don't think either of their's is completely correct (although of course one must be true), but Eternaly_lost's seems more logical, whereas Velasco seems a tad desperate here
Vote Velasco
