OK, sorry if this has been answered but i just thought of this.
Ok, you start as a monarch, or duke or whatever and say you have two titles, or that as you play the game you acquire several titles, and various demense lands. Then you have 2 powerful sons which if you choose one over the other civil war could break out and if you choose the wrong one your game could end, or leave you with very little land. So you decide to split the lands and/or titles. (This could apply to 3 sons as well, etc.)
Which do you control???????
My guess/suggestion would be that you make the one you want to control your heir to the lands and titles you want to keep and then offer the other the various titles and lands. Anyone see any problems with this? Ways it could work better?
Ok, you start as a monarch, or duke or whatever and say you have two titles, or that as you play the game you acquire several titles, and various demense lands. Then you have 2 powerful sons which if you choose one over the other civil war could break out and if you choose the wrong one your game could end, or leave you with very little land. So you decide to split the lands and/or titles. (This could apply to 3 sons as well, etc.)
Which do you control???????
My guess/suggestion would be that you make the one you want to control your heir to the lands and titles you want to keep and then offer the other the various titles and lands. Anyone see any problems with this? Ways it could work better?