• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

CK2 - Dev Diary #125 - Christian Rulers in The Iron Century

Welcome to another Dev Diary about The Iron Century. Today we are going to talk a bit about some of the Christian rulers you can find in the new bookmark. Note, most of the rulers shown here will have randomized traits.

Clipboard01.png

Here for a glimpse of what Christian Europe look like in 936.

King Louis IV of West Francia: Louis is among the last kings of the Karling dynasty. He was followed by Lothair, his eldest son, and later his grandson Louis V, which ended up as the final monarch of the dynasty. In our bookmark, King Louis is 15 years old and has recently returned from England to rule his homeland. Under his rule is the strongman Hugues the Great of the Capet dynasty, as well as unruly Occitans in the south and the newly settled Normans to the north. If he can only quell his vassals and their bids for power, West Francia is a strong base for the future of the dynasty.

Clipboard02.png


King Rudolf of Arles: Originally the king of Upper-Burgundy, he collected the two halves of Burgundy to form the new Kingdom of Arles. The Italians to the east, led by the industrious Hugues of the Bosonid dynasty, form a threat to the capital of Arles as well as the area around Provence. Besides that, Rudolf is in a good position to ally with most of the rulers around him, though his Kingdom is small enough to be tossed aside by the larger powers at play.

Clipboard03.png


Duke Boleslav (the Cruel) of Bohemia: The Bohemian rose to the title of Duke through the fratricide of his brother (Good King) Wenceslaus. Though his rise to power was bloody, Boleslav ruled well and was known as an efficient administrator. Early in his rule he ended the tribute to the German king Otto, and ended up in conflict with the Germans for the next 15-20 years. Boleslav is a tough start, as he is surrounded by pagans in every direction, be it with the Polish rulers to the north, Hungary to the south or Kievan Rus to the far east.

Clipboard04.png


Tsar Peter of the Bulgarian Empire: Son of the first Emperor of Bulgaria, he is the heir to a strong legacy. To the south and east is the Byzantine Empire, the Bulgarians have a long history fraught with conflicts and interactions with them. To the north the Hungarians have pushed into the Carpathian Basin, and taken huge chunks of land that used to be under Bulgarian rule. As an extra note here, the Bulgarian Empire is actually a DeJure Empire in the 936 start, spanning the Kingdoms of Bulgaria and Wallachia.

Clipboard05.png


Basileus Romanos of the Byzantine Empire: We could not have a list of Christian rulers without the Byzantines, could we? Romanos of the Lekapenos dynasty is the co-emperor of the Byzantine Empire, together with Konstantinos of the Makedon dynasty (he holds Nikomedeia and Herakleia), but he is the elder of the two and functionally the one calling the shots. Though the Byzantine Empire has been through a rough ride lately, they have recently come to a peace agreement with their northern neighbors in Bulgaria, and the muslims are shattering at their southern and eastern fronts. With the rise of the many Shia and Sunni rulers (the Fatimids, the Buyids, the Sallarids, the Jannabids, the Hamdanids, the Ikhshidids, the Al-Thamalis etc) in the vacuum left by the weakened Abbasid Caliphate, the Byzantine Empire are posed to take back some of their ancient lands as their enemies are busy fighting one another.

Clipboard06.png


Hopefully you have found this little look into the some of the different Christian rulers (and of course, there are plenty more for you to find when you get access to The Iron Century yourself). We look forward to see you again tomorrow when we’ll take a look at the Muslim rulers who populate the map in the year 936!

PS, for those who enjoyed the first chapter of Thankmar's Rebellion, here's the second chapter! https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...-iron-century-mini-aar.1179523/#post-25478718
 
  • 1Love
Reactions:
Clipboard06.png

While having the brown tribal banners in earlier teases, Zoltán is now feudal. Is this final? Also will Carpathia have additional formation requirements? And is Kingdom of Magyar still around as a separate title from Hungary (Zoltán has a strong claim on a kingdom that is likely Magyar)?

upload_2019-5-20_6-53-46.png

Has Kingdom of Lotharingia been deactivated in this start date? Otherwise, what's stopping Giselbert to simply for the Kingdom as he controls all the necessary territory? If it's been deactivate, how are the duchies distributed between France and Germany? And finally, is there a decision to form the Grand Duchy of Lotharingia (similar to Saxony, Swabia & Franconia)?
 
While having the brown tribal banners in earlier teases, Zoltán is now feudal. Is this final? Also will Carpathia have additional formation requirements? And is Kingdom of Magyar still around as a separate title from Hungary (Zoltán has a strong claim on a kingdom that is likely Magyar)?

Has Kingdom of Lotharingia been deactivated in this start date? Otherwise, what's stopping Giselbert to simply for the Kingdom as he controls all the necessary territory? If it's been deactivate, how are the duchies distributed between France and Germany? And finally, is there a decision to form the Grand Duchy of Lotharingia (similar to Saxony, Swabia & Franconia)?

He is meant to be tribal, not feudal. After a merge, he had accidentally gotten access to a Castle (the bastard). I made sure last night that he lost access to all Castles, and he has returned to his huts.

The Kingdom of Lotharingia has not been deactivated. Nothing stops Giselbert besides gold, I guess?
 
Could you please fix the the title history for the Holu Roman Empire so that they have the correct regnal numbers.
 
They very literally were "friendly neighbours" for the next 30 years or so, after our start date. Bulgaria has a whole lot of barony holdings in Thracian lands though, so I am sure they'll find reasons to start wars with one another.

Sure, but that´s not the point. (not entirely at least, to be fair)

The question is how does this map lead to the 1066 map? Why would the Byzantines gobble up de jure k-Bulagria in the next 130 years? If the empire of Bulgaria has de jure lands, there is a near zero chance that this will happen. Are there events that cover the byzantine-bulgarian wars of Basil II?

Also, taking presure off Bulgaria means that the (AI-led) tags in de jure k-Sicily as well as de jure k-Serbia are pretty much doomed, getting a disproportionally larger share of "imperial love".
 
Is Kingdom of Arles just being localization for Burgundy with some special rules to be (which ones?), or it's titular title?
 
The Kingdom of Lotharingia has not been deactivated. Nothing stops Giselbert besides gold, I guess?
The historical Giselbert was referred to as a duke in this era, but he had a lot more authority than dukes in the later middle ages. So the transition from duke to king would, I guess, be a symbol of him decidedly cutting ties with Otto and starting his own realm? Makes me wonder whether he should be prevented from forming a kingdom until he's no longer a tributary of the Karlings, but that's an addition for another time.
 
Could we see the De Jure Kingdoms (and/or Empires) in the new start date?

Any changes to graphical cultures and minor graphical stuff? (like for example putting the Basques back in occitangfx or southerngfx) .

I see there are some new navigable rivers in the Iberian Peninsula... Any new terrain or province changes?

Will the new De Jure Bulgarian Empire exist in other start dates?
 
The question is how does this map lead to the 1066 map? Why would the Byzantines gobble up de jure k-Bulagria in the next 130 years? If the empire of Bulgaria has de jure lands, there is a near zero chance that this will happen. Are there events that cover the byzantine-bulgarian wars of Basil II?

A lot of historical border changes don't have a realistic chance of happening during gameplay due to a lack of CBs that could result in something similar, so there's nothing really unique about this case, and things tend to go off the rails quickly enough that later wars don't necessarily make any sense at all (and railroading is not to everyone's liking).

That said, giving the ERE limited access to the Imperial Reconquest CB (say for the area that's de jure part of the kingdoms of Bulgaria, Thrace, Epirus, Greece, Anatolia, and Trebizond (or ideally for the specific duchies in that area, as de jure drift otherwise can mess things up)) might be a good idea.
 
When someone dies in your dungeon & have no living relatives, you should get their gold. It's only realistic. Also, you should get their artifacts. At the very least their should be a mechanic as to how to the odds are of you catching them with their riches on them & how much riches they would have based off opponents (Intrigue*2*martial*1.25) + greed (if greedy =+25/ your (intrigue*3*martial*1.5) or something formula so its more likely that you catch them with more money when they are greedy.
1) This has nothing to do with the subject matter of the Dev diary or even the expansion.
2) A character's wealth represents their treasury - a sum which it would be all but impossible for them to carry by themselves; and their artefacts are likewise in their treasury unless equipped. I don't think your idea is sensible at all.

nd
 
What will be the point of next DD? Pagan rulers?

And also what about Spain and Navarra? I'm struggling to continue Requoncista in the first and the second start dates and don't want to it with divided kingdoms in 1066.
 
A lot of historical border changes don't have a realistic chance of happening during gameplay due to a lack of CBs that could result in something similar, so there's nothing really unique about this case, and things tend to go off the rails quickly enough that later wars don't necessarily make any sense at all (and railroading is not to everyone's liking).

That said, giving the ERE limited access to the Imperial Reconquest CB (say for the area that's de jure part of the kingdoms of Bulgaria, Thrace, Epirus, Greece, Anatolia, and Trebizond (or ideally for the specific duchies in that area, as de jure drift otherwise can mess things up)) might be a good idea.

Not railroading, but chance of happening, or a plausible (ingame) explanation why A led to B. Railroading would be definitely too much. That being said, de jure k-Sicily and k-Serbia would be railroaded to be eaten prematurely in this setup.

I like the the idea of the limited acces to imperial reconquest CB though, if it is defined well, with clear triggers that unlock it.
 
What will be the point of next DD? Pagan rulers?

And also what about Spain and Navarra? I'm struggling to continue Requoncista in the first and the second start dates and don't want to it with divided kingdoms in 1066.

Honestly, what is really the point of anything? Why are we doing this? Is everything just a digital simulation?!

(Jokes aside, next DD will be about Muslims. And I didn't want the DD to be too long, so there are a lot of rulers that I missed out on, that you guys will have to find and explore for yourselves.)